Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AA IAD-LAX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 1999 | 10:43 am
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Cubicle Btwn IAD & DCA
Programs: UA
Posts: 485
AA IAD-LAX

Jul 12 AA 135 IAD-LAX 757 first
Jul 17 AA 76 LAX-IAD 767 business

This is the first time I flew with AA since last Sept. I tried to switch to UA but couldn't; I wasn't going to pay $400 difference out of my pocket. I have to wait longer to archieve Premier this year. Used 15K miles and $75 fee to upgrade from Y-fare.

AA 135 was my favorite flight to LAX. It's the least crowded flight I found on this route; I always had an empty seat next to me in the coach section. First class seats had very conformable width but it didn't have any leg support.

On the return trip, the flight was full. My two biggest complain on this flight were; first there weren't air vents in the cabin at least business section. It's got hot in second half of the flight. I haven't noticed this before on prior 767s on IAD-LAX run. Secondly, I wished there were a little more of leg room. One little annoyance is with audio quality of the in-flight entertainment system. There were too much noise. I couldn't hear the music clearly.

Even though flight service were nice, I didn't like AA's first class and business class seats. BTW both planes' cabin weren't remodeled yet. Since I haven't tried new 737-800 on this route, I can't tell how much the seats will be improved. Maybe it's unfair to compare to business class on 747 but I vote goes to UA business class on IAD-LAX run. The food is toss up but 747's seats were much more comfortable and its entertainment system's audio was much clear. Additionally it had Hawaiian channel.

AA's seats will improve when AA remodel all of its cabins but I'll try to stick to UA from now on when traveling Y/B fares. It cost much less to upgrade on UA.



------------------
Dan
dilbert is offline  
Old Jul 19, 1999 | 12:36 pm
  #2  
doc
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 46,817
Thanks Dan - sounds like PremEx won't take much longer based on this account. Glad you distingushed the 747 comparison. It is such a nice aircraft especially in the front cabin!
doc is offline  
Old Jul 22, 1999 | 2:33 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: New York City
Posts: 287
Doesn't UA use Airbus aircraft almost exclusively now? It seems they like the 747 and 777 for DEN-LAX/SFO now. I find it difficult to spend 5-6 hours in a single aisle plane, regardless of class of service. I'm one of the few fans of DL's fleet of Tri-Stars and 767s.
SD Flyer is offline  
Old Jul 22, 1999 | 3:10 pm
  #4  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Cubicle Btwn IAD & DCA
Programs: UA
Posts: 485
UA uses A319/A320 on most of IAD-LAX runs except UA963 and UA962 & UA194 on LAX-IAD.

I prefer wide-body planes on any flights that over 3-4 hours over I try to find a less crowded flight...

------------------
Dan
dilbert is offline  
Old Jul 23, 1999 | 10:45 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Seat 1A, Juice pretty much everywhere, Mucci des Coins Exotiques
Posts: 34,337
Yep. I just booked the 777 from LAX to IAD even though it means I arrive 2 hours before my connecting flight. It's much preferable to the A320 and I can spend some time in the RCC catching up on email.
stimpy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.