Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

airbus = scarebus?

airbus = scarebus?

Old Jun 19, 09, 1:33 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 135
airbus = scarebus?

Maybe I've read one too many articles of the airbus tails snapping off, but do any of you feel more secure in a particular make of airplane, be it boeing or airbus, tupolev, ilyushin, embrarer, etc.?
that_guy is offline  
Old Jun 19, 09, 2:31 pm
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 69,211
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8830/4.2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)

I have no idea how much you have read but I'd say that your conclusions (or at least the thread title) are rather there are thousands upon thousands of flights every day and the overwhelming majority operate just fine. Freak accidents will happen but the odds are such that worrying about it is silly.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Jun 19, 09, 3:27 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Port Aransas, TX
Programs: AA 2MM, SPG, IHG
Posts: 34
Scarebus, Ridiculous. I love flying on the 330/340/380, and would tomorrow. Heck I even love flying the Boeing planes too.

Although, your are more likely to be in a crash than winning a major lottery. Says something about buying lottery tickets.
mmood is offline  
Old Jun 19, 09, 3:56 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: EWR Ionosphere Club, LAX Clipper Club, Still Traveling Global, yearly BIS miles
Programs: EAL Silver Wings, I-Club, Flying Colonels DL, WorldPass PLat from the olde Meatball and PE SMARTbank
Posts: 1,870
Use to really think of A340 as a great plane but both times I flew in one the cabin plastic and overhead baggage shook so bad that I dont think I ever want to do that again. Last time it was iberia in march, jfk - mad, lots of burn out lights, overhead baggage loose, lots of turbulance. not fun
frank_10b is offline  
Old Jun 19, 09, 4:05 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: AMS
Programs: Flying Blue Gold
Posts: 1,849
Well I've flown on aircraft built by all the manufacturers listed by the OP (and more besides) and can't say I felt any more or less secure on any of them IME. Isn't this more of a kiddiestalkingaboutairliners.net thread?
bcmatt is offline  
Old Jun 19, 09, 4:09 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: statusless these days
Posts: 20,989
It's going to be partisan so best not to argue about. However, what attracted my attention is this report:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6523467.ece

I've never been a fan of flight protection envelop and excessive automation.
YVR Cockroach is offline  
Old Jun 19, 09, 9:43 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Home: Arlington, VA; Home airports: IAD/DCA/BWI
Programs: Active: AA, UA, DL
Posts: 4,092
I prefer Boeings, like how some people prefer Armani or Prada. But, what really matters is how well the aircraft is maintained and the competency of the crew.

Accidents do happen and are bound to happen, which could be beyond the control of the crew or the maintenance crew. But you're at higher risk from dying in a car wreck than in a plane crash. Car wrecks occur all the time; however, the number of victims per incident is very low. But, in a plane crash, although it doesn't happen that often, the absolute number of victims (100+) seem to catch people's attention.
Wiirachay is offline  
Old Jun 19, 09, 10:10 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: BKK/SEL/YQG
Posts: 2,543
I've been on domestic Syrian flights on Yakolev-40's. I am not afraid of Airbusses.
SirJman is offline  
Old Jun 19, 09, 11:55 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Soon to be LEGT
Posts: 10,928
I've been on the airport bus in CMB. Now that was a Scarebus!
graraps is offline  
Old Jun 20, 09, 12:14 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mountain West USA
Posts: 436
Originally Posted by frank_10b
Use to really think of A340 as a great plane but both times I flew in one the cabin plastic and overhead baggage shook so bad that I dont think I ever want to do that again. Last time it was iberia in march, jfk - mad, lots of burn out lights, overhead baggage loose, lots of turbulance. not fun
That just sounds like Iberia isn't keeping the cabins in good condition. That shouldn't be taken as a reflection on the aircraft.
GreatChecko is offline  
Old Jun 20, 09, 1:06 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,430
I'd be more concerned about accidentally rear-ending a Ford Pinto while driving. The odds of that are probably much higher than ever having anything happening on any commercial aircraft.
rjque is offline  
Old Jun 20, 09, 2:29 am
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: back to my roots in Scotland!
Programs: Tamsin - what else is there to say?
Posts: 47,844
Originally Posted by YVR Cockroach
It's going to be partisan so best not to argue about. However, what attracted my attention is this report:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6523467.ece

I've never been a fan of flight protection envelop and excessive automation.
I'll raise you with this PDF report on a 737 problem, where for no reason that can be discovered, autothrust just shuts itself off, uncommanded. Oh yeah, and the warning system that tells pilots it's just happened may be inadequate!

http://www.aaib.gov.uk/sites/aaib/pu...009_g_thof.cfm

But that just goes to show the level of monitoring which goes on worldwide on all aircraft to ensure what are rare events (given the number of hours the type has flown, versus the number of incidents), are fully investigated and corrective re-design put in if required. Because I bet very few of you were even aware of this incident (Small regional airport, charter airline, no casualties, probably didn't even make the press), but it's been the subject of a full investigation by AAIB. And that to me is why no one aircraft type is safer than another - because they are all closely monitored and investigated as soon as a possible problem may be detected.
Jenbel is offline  
Old Jun 20, 09, 5:04 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 73
I'm a scaredy-cat flyer in any aircraft. Boeing, Airbus, Focker or hot air balloon makes no difference to me. Each one has the capacity to fall to earth but I don't think it is healthy to create hysteria until all the facts are known. When you think about it, no airline designer, airline company or parts manufacturer wants catastrophic events attached to their name so I trust that when an accident happens, the parties involved will move heaven and earth to find out why and rectify the situation. I believe the catalyst for any accident is never one factor but a series of things. If pilots fly Airbuses then it's good enough for me because they are the best judge.

Diva
http://1stclassdiva.wordpress.com/
kimala koala is offline  
Old Jun 20, 09, 5:50 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NYNY
Programs: Marriott LT Titanium, UA Silver, AA dirt, Amtrak Select, Uber Platinum
Posts: 832
I've never felt scared of any particular aircraft. Although, I'd rather fly on a 737 or 319 over a Dash-8 any day of the week.
newbiztraveler is offline  
Old Jun 20, 09, 7:00 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Traveling the World
Posts: 5,960
There are puppies living in the belly hold

I swear the first time when I flew on an Airbus 320 I could swear there were puppies that lived permanently in the belly hold. They started to bark as soon as we pushed back on the runway as if they were scared.

So if its scary for people then it must be scary for those poor dogs holding residence down there.

This is what I mean http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grd5eJjJcL4
danielonn is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread