Purpose of winglets on airplanes?
#16
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22,778
Using winglets increases lift and therefor shortens the take off distance. It also shortens the distance between two successive aircraft. I don't think the highlighted part of your claim is correct. I can't think of any reason why it would increase fuel consumption during take off and climb.
Last edited by Yaatri; May 18, 2009 at 10:33 am
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Massachusetts, USA; AA Plat, DL GM and Flying Colonel; Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 24,233
#19
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Southern California
Programs: DL: 3.8 MM, Marriott: Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 24,575
Since OMNI is, generally, a forum for everything other than miles, points and travel topics, we're going to switch this over to TravelBuzz!
But we'll leave a re-direct here in OMNI too so it'll reach eyeballs in both forums.
Please follow at its new home.
Thanks.
_______________
Cholula
OMNI Co-Moderator
But we'll leave a re-direct here in OMNI too so it'll reach eyeballs in both forums.
Please follow at its new home.
Thanks.
_______________
Cholula
OMNI Co-Moderator
#20
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Programs: DL CO UA
Posts: 164
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: south of WAS DC
Posts: 10,131
it is my understanding that if the wing is "perfectly" designed, winglets are not necessary. the winglets correct errors after the "perfectly" designed wing is found to need a bit of assistance.
#22
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: DL Platinum
Posts: 556
Any chemists want to translate?
"Are you lonely? Don't be. You have a friend in tape hiss, in the background creak of wooden chairs, in the crackle and click of four-track recordings. And besides, I'm coming over later tonight, and I'm bringing S1C3R1A1B3B3L1E1 and mojitos. [Info]
Posted by Jordan at August 4, 2006 2:37 PM "
"Are you lonely? Don't be. You have a friend in tape hiss, in the background creak of wooden chairs, in the crackle and click of four-track recordings. And besides, I'm coming over later tonight, and I'm bringing S1C3R1A1B3B3L1E1 and mojitos. [Info]
Posted by Jordan at August 4, 2006 2:37 PM "
Thank you for the information on the wing tips. I was curious about the 777. Plus, weren't the wingtips on the 747 added in the 1990s and 2000s? Why did it take the engineers so long to discover this and correct this? As I recall, wingtips were on the A300 and A320 for quite some time before being added to the 747.
Does anyone know the difference in design between the 777 wing and all the others that the engineers originally thought that it did not need a wingtip? I have also noticed that the 777 wing appears much stiffer than the A330 wing, in that it does not sag at the ends. Does this give it any advantages/disadvantages or is it just a difference in design?
Finally, thanks for moving this thread. I did not know where to start it.
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Sunshine State
Programs: Deltaworst Peon Level, TSA "Layer 21 Club", NW WP RIP
Posts: 11,370
Even if the advantages were known when the 747 was designed, it was designed in the 1960s when kerosene was 25 cents/gallon. Not cost effective to install.
Fast forward to 1990 or so, when the the next generation planes are being built, offering better fuel economy on two big engines than a 1969 design with 4 engines. Oh, and kerosene is now $2 a gallon. New generation were designed from the start with every fuel saving device known like winglets as standard equipment Adding winglets on later model 747-400s to cut fuel flow made economic sense and keeps the plane in the market so we can enjoy Upstairs.
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC*SE 2MM
Posts: 16,652
The 747-300 first flew in 1982 and apart from the extended upper deck didn't get much of a redesign at that time, so it's wing design dates back to the 1960's. The A-320 was a completely new design that first flew in 1987, so was able to incorporate more modern design. the A-300 had very small winglets.
#25
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Not all of them. The newer models (773, 77L) have a raked wing design that provides similar benefit. The 77A and 772ER (the earlier 777 models) do not have the raked wingtips and can potentially benefit from winglets.
As for why they are less efficient at climb-out/landing it is an aerodynamics and speed thing. At the slower speeds the vortexes aren't as big a deal. At higher speed they are and that is why the winglets help at cruise. At least that is my understanding of it.
As for why they are less efficient at climb-out/landing it is an aerodynamics and speed thing. At the slower speeds the vortexes aren't as big a deal. At higher speed they are and that is why the winglets help at cruise. At least that is my understanding of it.
#26
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,570
That's my understanding too: at low speeds, the winglet does not add anything (or much). And since it has a nontrivial weight to it, the take-out / climb-out requires more fuel consumption.
I've noticed that WN uses a mix of wingletted and nonwingletted 737's. I've wondered if they purposely assign the wingletted planes to their longer routes. Knowing that there always seems to be logic and purpose behind everything that WN does, it would not surprise me at all.
I've noticed that WN uses a mix of wingletted and nonwingletted 737's. I've wondered if they purposely assign the wingletted planes to their longer routes. Knowing that there always seems to be logic and purpose behind everything that WN does, it would not surprise me at all.
#28
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Munich, Germany
Programs: Miles&More Blue, SPG Silver
Posts: 3,378
Yes technically these are winglets, too. Still the A380 has a wing geometry which doesn't make it necessary to put very large winglets on the ends. If you take a look at the the A380 wing it is bended already. So you only need this little tips at the end unlike the large ones you see on the 737-800 or the retrofitted 767.
#29
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: IAD
Programs: United MP
Posts: 7,822
Thank you for the information on the wing tips. I was curious about the 777. Plus, weren't the wingtips on the 747 added in the 1990s and 2000s? Why did it take the engineers so long to discover this and correct this? As I recall, wingtips were on the A300 and A320 for quite some time before being added to the 747.
#30
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: DL Platinum
Posts: 556
Yes technically these are winglets, too. Still the A380 has a wing geometry which doesn't make it necessary to put very large winglets on the ends. If you take a look at the the A380 wing it is bended already. So you only need this little tips at the end unlike the large ones you see on the 737-800 or the retrofitted 767.
I still remember watching the slats on the 727 fold forward from underneath the wing. I think the early generations of the 747 did the same thing, but I don't remember. They look so much more aerodynamic now with the slats sliding forward from their location. I always find it interesting as the slats and flaps are deploying and redeploying that the plane doesn't violently pitch up and down as the amount of lift changes dramatically.