When someone repacks baggage at the checkin counter to avoid excess baggage fees...
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Programs: AS,WN,UA,B6,hotels
Posts: 4,239
When someone repacks baggage at the checkin counter to avoid excess baggage fees...
When someone repacks baggage at the checkin counter to avoid excess baggage fees, the checkin agent should send him/her to the back of the line so that the time spent repacking delays only himself/herself, instead of everyone else in the line.
I've been stuck behind baggage repackers before, and I wonder how much faster the checkin line would go if airlines had that policy.
I've been stuck behind baggage repackers before, and I wonder how much faster the checkin line would go if airlines had that policy.
#3
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
Originally Posted by tjl
When someone repacks baggage at the checkin counter to avoid excess baggage fees, the checkin agent should send him/her to the back of the line so that the time spent repacking delays only himself/herself, instead of everyone else in the line.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: IAH
Programs: La Ministreuse de Surréalisme, CO Plat, MR Plat, SPG Plat
Posts: 11,358
If I'm questionable on my bag's weight, I keep a zip top tote and my heavier items in the outside pocket so that if I'm overweight, I pop it out and check it. It is done without taking any extra time.
#5
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: DFW
Programs: DL PM, .6MM; AA Plat; Marriott Platinum Premier
Posts: 4,891
Originally Posted by donnyb
Most people I have seen are pretty quick about shifting things around, but how about putting a scale out at the checkin line?
Folks could check the bag weight before they get in line.
Folks could check the bag weight before they get in line.
#6
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA
Programs: AA Platinum
Posts: 940
A couple of years ago at the AA check-in in LGW this poor girl was having a nightmare of a time dealing with her overweight bags and she was so frustrated she dumped both her BIG suitcases on the ground, put one of them on the scale and started adding items until the agent told her she had hit her max. Fine, one bag done and then did the same with the other bag.
She then took the rest of the stuff and shoved it in her carry-ons any way she could and even layered the cloths / coats she was wearing! I felt bad for the girl but it was one of the most hilarious things I've seen!!!! All her clothes were just strewn all over the floor and everyone was just standing their watching!
She then took the rest of the stuff and shoved it in her carry-ons any way she could and even layered the cloths / coats she was wearing! I felt bad for the girl but it was one of the most hilarious things I've seen!!!! All her clothes were just strewn all over the floor and everyone was just standing their watching!
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DTW, but drive to/from YYZ/ORD
Programs: Chase Ultimate Rewards 2MM, Diner Club points
Posts: 31,920
Originally Posted by tjl
When someone repacks baggage at the checkin counter to avoid excess baggage fees, the checkin agent should send him/her to the back of the line so that the time spent repacking delays only himself/herself, instead of everyone else in the line.
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Programs: AS,WN,UA,B6,hotels
Posts: 4,239
Originally Posted by nd_eric_77
IIRC, CO has this for the international check-in area at IAH; not sure about other carriers / airports.
#9
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: UA*G(1K), PC Diamond Amb, Marriott Titanium, Accor Platinum
Posts: 4,671
Originally Posted by tjl
When someone repacks baggage at the checkin counter to avoid excess baggage fees, the checkin agent should send him/her to the back of the line so that the time spent repacking delays only himself/herself, instead of everyone else in the line.
Well, I guess there's one exception to that agent thing: when they have oversold the flight and are looking for people not making the checkin deadline to avoid IDB situations. But I'm sure any court at least in Germany would order that the only responsibility of the customer is to arrive at the airport and be in line in time. From there it's the airline's responsibility to make sure they have enough capacity to check you in.
HTB.
#10
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hsinchu (Taiwan), Saigon, London
Programs: EVA (diamond), A3, BMI, VN
Posts: 2,960
What's worse is waiting whilst a PAX endlessly argues about why they shouldn't be charged for being over.
Some years ago, I was behind a girl at LHR travelling to Japan with BA. We were both in Y. She had 137Kg (exc hand luggage) - mostly sound equipment. It didn't look so much - I'm guessing there were some speakers/transformers in there. Limit would have been 20 or 25, can't remember now.
The check-in agent had done the calculation and the charge was more than the discounted ticket she had purchased. She had then offered her a deal. Think it was 40Kg for free, then half the normal charge above that. She would overlook the fact that she was way over on hand luggage also.
The girl wasn't having it... demanding to take the whole lot for free because:
1) She was a student and on a budget
2) She was a musician and there should be special concessions for musicians
3) There's nothing on the ticket to say she couldn't take more than 20Kg (!!)
4) BA's position of making profit out of students was immoral.
5) She had no money with her. The agent suggested credit card, but she said she didn't want to use it until she got to Japan.
She kept whining along the lines of:
"but that isn't going to help me"
"you're not interested in a solution"
"don't they train you in customer service"
The agent politely stood her ground, though I don't know the outcome as eventually I was served at the adjacent check-in. At this point a "supervisor" had been demanded.
Some years ago, I was behind a girl at LHR travelling to Japan with BA. We were both in Y. She had 137Kg (exc hand luggage) - mostly sound equipment. It didn't look so much - I'm guessing there were some speakers/transformers in there. Limit would have been 20 or 25, can't remember now.
The check-in agent had done the calculation and the charge was more than the discounted ticket she had purchased. She had then offered her a deal. Think it was 40Kg for free, then half the normal charge above that. She would overlook the fact that she was way over on hand luggage also.
The girl wasn't having it... demanding to take the whole lot for free because:
1) She was a student and on a budget
2) She was a musician and there should be special concessions for musicians
3) There's nothing on the ticket to say she couldn't take more than 20Kg (!!)
4) BA's position of making profit out of students was immoral.
5) She had no money with her. The agent suggested credit card, but she said she didn't want to use it until she got to Japan.
She kept whining along the lines of:
"but that isn't going to help me"
"you're not interested in a solution"
"don't they train you in customer service"
The agent politely stood her ground, though I don't know the outcome as eventually I was served at the adjacent check-in. At this point a "supervisor" had been demanded.
#11
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the path to perdition
Programs: Delta, United
Posts: 4,786
Hmm, flying out Honolulu this past spring I would have been that passenger. And frankly I really did not care who was delayed or how long it was going to take me. Why - because the agent checking bags was a total *&%$ and I was going to make sure that my displeasure was known. Especially, because they were not following the rules put in place by the airline.
Now I just take out the extra weight and just put it back in when I give my bags to the TSA.
BTW The whole operation in Honolulu sucks, from the ag inspections, to check in, to the TSA. It may be paradise but the attitude of the people there sucks for the most part.
Now I just take out the extra weight and just put it back in when I give my bags to the TSA.
BTW The whole operation in Honolulu sucks, from the ag inspections, to check in, to the TSA. It may be paradise but the attitude of the people there sucks for the most part.
Last edited by FlyingUnderTheRadar; Nov 17, 2006 at 8:09 pm
#12
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Roseville, California (SMF)
Programs: Luckest hitchhiker ever! WN CSA/SMF
Posts: 441
Originally Posted by jimbo99
What's worse is waiting whilst a PAX endlessly argues about why they shouldn't be charged for being over.
Some years ago, I was behind a girl at LHR travelling to Japan with BA. We were both in Y. She had 137Kg (exc hand luggage) - mostly sound equipment. It didn't look so much - I'm guessing there were some speakers/transformers in there. Limit would have been 20 or 25, can't remember now.
The check-in agent had done the calculation and the charge was more than the discounted ticket she had purchased. She had then offered her a deal. Think it was 40Kg for free, then half the normal charge above that. She would overlook the fact that she was way over on hand luggage also.
The girl wasn't having it... demanding to take the whole lot for free because:
1) She was a student and on a budget
2) She was a musician and there should be special concessions for musicians
3) There's nothing on the ticket to say she couldn't take more than 20Kg (!!)
4) BA's position of making profit out of students was immoral.
5) She had no money with her. The agent suggested credit card, but she said she didn't want to use it until she got to Japan.
She kept whining along the lines of:
"but that isn't going to help me"
"you're not interested in a solution"
"don't they train you in customer service"
The agent politely stood her ground, though I don't know the outcome as eventually I was served at the adjacent check-in. At this point a "supervisor" had been demanded.
Some years ago, I was behind a girl at LHR travelling to Japan with BA. We were both in Y. She had 137Kg (exc hand luggage) - mostly sound equipment. It didn't look so much - I'm guessing there were some speakers/transformers in there. Limit would have been 20 or 25, can't remember now.
The check-in agent had done the calculation and the charge was more than the discounted ticket she had purchased. She had then offered her a deal. Think it was 40Kg for free, then half the normal charge above that. She would overlook the fact that she was way over on hand luggage also.
The girl wasn't having it... demanding to take the whole lot for free because:
1) She was a student and on a budget
2) She was a musician and there should be special concessions for musicians
3) There's nothing on the ticket to say she couldn't take more than 20Kg (!!)
4) BA's position of making profit out of students was immoral.
5) She had no money with her. The agent suggested credit card, but she said she didn't want to use it until she got to Japan.
She kept whining along the lines of:
"but that isn't going to help me"
"you're not interested in a solution"
"don't they train you in customer service"
The agent politely stood her ground, though I don't know the outcome as eventually I was served at the adjacent check-in. At this point a "supervisor" had been demanded.
#13
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: EWR
Programs: Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Gold (Current Platinum), United Mileage Plus, Avis Preferred
Posts: 850
Bowling Balls
I am the one in front of you who is repacking bowling balls. I had to do this once on UA, while flying from Billings, MT to EWR, through DEN. I switched one ball out of my triple bag with a pair of shoes from my luggage.
Generally, I like CO b/c they allow triple ball bags to be checked as sports equipment, even if they are overweight. My only problem was the first time I flew CO after they switched their weight limit from 75 to 50 lbs. Before the switch there was never an issue, but my first time after the swtich, I was forced to re-pack. After my return, I reviewed the regs, and found that not only was I exempt because of the sport equipment rules, I had actually booked the ticket prior to the announcement of the switch, and so my bags had actually been "grandfathered" in.
Generally, I like CO b/c they allow triple ball bags to be checked as sports equipment, even if they are overweight. My only problem was the first time I flew CO after they switched their weight limit from 75 to 50 lbs. Before the switch there was never an issue, but my first time after the swtich, I was forced to re-pack. After my return, I reviewed the regs, and found that not only was I exempt because of the sport equipment rules, I had actually booked the ticket prior to the announcement of the switch, and so my bags had actually been "grandfathered" in.
Last edited by JohnneeO; Nov 19, 2006 at 6:55 pm Reason: Spelling Error
#15
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 562
Originally Posted by jaylenofan86
Trust me, we CS agents have NO compassion for people who try to pull this with us. I mean if the bag is 50.5 pounds, I'll let them slide with the extra .5 pound, but I've had people who were having a hissy fit over 75-90 pound bags!