Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Flying (or Train) between London and Paris?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Flying (or Train) between London and Paris?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 2:26 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3
Flying (or Train) between London and Paris?

I'm trying to go to Paris for a day and a half while I'm in London for 9 days....I looked at flights yesterday and they were all $240 or so, and are now much higher...Train tickets on Eurostar seem even more expensive!

Any advice on how to do a quick trip to Paris, and the easiest/cheapest way to do it? Also, are the airports directly in Paris, or out of the city? I'm trying to figure out if it is better to fly or take the train, and any tips on finding discounted rates-I know there are sometimes discounts for people under 25.

Thanks for your help!!
sadiemay is offline  
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 2:30 pm
  #2  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: VIENNA VA
Programs: BA emerald, AF rouge ,UA premier executive, SQ,ANA, HYATT,, AMENITI
Posts: 839
If you r looking for cheaper the train is your choice as both LHR and CDG are a little outside of both London and Paris.
Even if you do not take a taxi which is way too expensive in both cities,you still save a lot of money.
SMART51 is offline  
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 2:37 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 7,419
We went in April/May 2006 Paris-London-Paris.
Paid about Euro 80 (on SNCF) for the train.
BMI CDG-LHR-CDG was about Euro 100+ (all in).
USAFAN is offline  
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 6:16 pm
  #4  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Asheville, NC
Programs: Virtuoso, FSPP, STARS, MO FAN Club, PEN Club, Bellini Club, Dorchester Diamond Club, InternovaSelect
Posts: 1,862
If you're going downtown to downtown, the train is the way to go. You save time and aggravation (no need for transportation from downtown to the airport, no need to get to the airport an hour early). As long as the price is in the same ballpark, the advantages of taking the train are compelling (to me).
DavidO is offline  
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 6:28 pm
  #5  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: BUR
Programs: in C/C++, Python, SQL
Posts: 346
I just booked some Eurostar tickets for later this summer. The rates did vary during the day--the peak travel times were quite a bit more expensive. Perhaps selecting earlier/later trains might help out. I know my total was far less than the $240 you said you saw for airfare.
Scott in LA is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 2:18 am
  #6  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 7,566
sadiemay, what dates are you looking at, what airlines have you tried, and where did you look for train fares?

There aren't many LCCs that operate between London and Paris, but you could try Easyjet - www.easyjet.com - who fly from LTN. LTN is "London" Luton Airport, but Luton is actually a town in its own right a fair way north of London. Still, if you don't mind the train journey there... but then again by the time you've got to Luton on the train you could be half-way to Paris on Eurostar.

Train fares start at GBP 29.50 one way (non-flexible), which is considerably less than the fare you were quoted - but if you're travelling around popular dates then the cheap tickets may well all have gone.
Aviatrix is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 3:21 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,752
Originally Posted by sadiemay
I'm trying to figure out if it is better to fly or take the train ...
If you're starting from one city's centre and heading for the other city's centre, then the train is much more convenient and probably faster overall than flying.

The downside is that the train seems usually to be significantly more expensive than flying. That, in part, reflects the convenience factor.

The best thing to do is to use all the flexible search functions that you can find. I don't think it's that easy to do on Eurostar, but at least there's only one train operator. On the airlines, BA, bmi and easyJet all have flexible search functions that allow you to home in pretty quickly on the cheaper/cheapest flights in the time period that you're thinking of.

But if it's really rather expensive however you do it, my advice would be to consider not going to Paris. A day and a half is better than the lunatic day trips that so many tourists think they should do when they've only got a few days in London anyway. But even with 1 days you won't see much of Paris, and she is worth a long visit all by herself. If you could easily do it cheaply, it might make some sense; but if it's too expensive, don't fret and come back to Europe to see only Paris next time.
Globaliser is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 4:04 am
  #8  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, U.K.
Programs: bmi British Midland International Diamond Club
Posts: 3,443
Originally Posted by sadiemay
I know there are sometimes discounts for people under 25.
Eurostar Youth fares are available to anyone under 26 - but beware, they may not be cheaper than normal Adult fares and sometimes availability is heavily restricted at certain busy times. Only buy a Youth fare if you really need some degree of flexibility with changes outside peak times.
Strawb is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 4:12 am
  #9  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 2,415
I cant believe the responses this far. Many FTs suggest taking the train. How can you suggest that without knowing more about the OP? We would have to know his/her airline elite statuses, need for more miles to requalify, alliance preferences, willingness to turn this into a mileage run (say flying via both Zurich and Geneva) and many other things.

Last edited by Helsinki Flyer; Jun 19, 2006 at 10:54 am Reason: Added the smiley to avoid confusion
Helsinki Flyer is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 4:30 am
  #10  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, U.K.
Programs: bmi British Midland International Diamond Club
Posts: 3,443
Oops!

Last edited by Strawb; Jun 18, 2006 at 5:22 pm
Strawb is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 4:44 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
500k
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Biggleswade
Programs: SK Gold, AY Gold
Posts: 13,675
It's worth looking for package (Eurostar + Hotel) deals, as I've often managed to get these for less than cost of the ticket alone! Try here and here.

Otherwise, these days, the only flight I'd consider is the very convenient LCY-ORY on AF. Door-to-door time tends to be less than the train on this for me (LCY has a 10-15 minute check-in time for AF). But that tends to be rather expensive (not to mention that LCY is closed Sat PM and Sun AM).
stut is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 5:13 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 640
The eurostar definitely takes you right where you want to be. Transportation from CDG and LHR are not as desirable as Waterloo to Gare Du Nord.

Thanks stut for posting about lastminute...some of those packages look good for next time.
Pointeater is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 4:48 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LAX
Programs: DL GM
Posts: 1,029
Originally Posted by Helsinki Flyer
I cant believe the responses this far. Many FTs suggest taking the train. How can you suggest that without knowing more about the OP? We would have to know his/her airline elite statuses, need for more miles to requalify, alliance preferences, willingness to turn this into a mileage run (say flying via both Zurich and Geneva) and many other things.
As a fairly obsessive collector and user of FF miles, I would never even consider flying between Paris and London unless it was the last week of December and I was a few hundred miles short of requalifying for Platinum status. The advantages of the train are enormous, especially for a short trip. I'm assuming the OP really wants to visit Paris. Turning the trip into a mileage run would eat up a ridiculous proportion of the OP's very limited time.
MJLogan is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 4:53 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Posts: 19,078
Originally Posted by stut
It's worth looking for package (Eurostar + Hotel) deals, as I've often managed to get these for less than cost of the ticket alone! Try here and here.
I also say get the train - and check the links provided by Stut.

Also, I've followed the advice given previously by UKflyer in another forum, and discovered that you can often get considerably cheaper rates by using Eurostar's Belgian site rather than the British one.

The train is much more eco friendly too! ^

(duck for cover)
LapLap is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2006 | 4:56 pm
  #15  
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
30 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 27,015
Welcome to Flyertalk, sadiemay.
Given the brevity of your trip I would definitely opt for Eurostar.
obscure2k is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.