Having to sit next to a PET - Is it reasonable???
#61

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BNA
Posts: 2,076
Whether sentimentals want to admit it or not animals are things and should not be treated like people. They are not family members nor do they have human emotions. People who dote on their animals make me sick, and it's these people who always seem to put their snooky ooky cutesy wootsies above other humans who may be inconvenienced or allergic. I truly care for my dog and would be crushed if something happened to him, but I don't think I'd make others have to sit by him on the plane. He'd be sedated and put somewhere else if possible. Actaully, at 16 he's probably too old to fly anyway. My only concern would be how the disgrutled luggage handlers would treat him.
I could not and would not sit next to a cat on a plane. I'm severely allergic to cats and I agree with whoever said it's my responsibility to be prepared, but since when do animals belong in a seat? So in answer to the OP, it is not reasonable.
Then again, I hate babies and small children and think they should be in stowage as well.
I've been drinking for hours so i reserve the right to edit this once I sober up and stop being an ........
I could not and would not sit next to a cat on a plane. I'm severely allergic to cats and I agree with whoever said it's my responsibility to be prepared, but since when do animals belong in a seat? So in answer to the OP, it is not reasonable.
Then again, I hate babies and small children and think they should be in stowage as well.
I've been drinking for hours so i reserve the right to edit this once I sober up and stop being an ........
#63




Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 461
while I agree that pet allergies could be a concern...
what about MY allergies to certain perfumes, etc, that some people insist on bathing themselves in.
Cats I can take.
Perfumes make ME ill.
so where are the limits?
Cats I can take.
Perfumes make ME ill.
so where are the limits?

