subway systems
Jan 18, 2006 | 3:07 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 303
subway systems
I always ride the subway in cities I visit.. you really get to experience the pulse of the city.
Budapest has the fastest closing doors and escalators (though that was 1993)
BART in San Francisco (arguably more a commutter rail than a subway though it does go underground for significant stretches) seems to be the fastest
Paris was the most efficient in terms of frequency of trains
what systems are memorable to you?
Budapest has the fastest closing doors and escalators (though that was 1993)
BART in San Francisco (arguably more a commutter rail than a subway though it does go underground for significant stretches) seems to be the fastest
Paris was the most efficient in terms of frequency of trains
what systems are memorable to you?
Jan 18, 2006 | 3:16 pm
#2
Join Date: May 2005
Location: London, England, United Kingdom
Programs: Marriott (Lifetime Titantium), whatever other programs as benefits make sense.
Posts: 2,012
Hong Kong's is the nicest I have ever been on. The trains are very clean, and they have this lighted subway maps that tell you where you are, where you are going and what side to exit the train. Very slick. Plus, really easy to get to the airport, always a plus.
Moscow has really, really deep subway stations. I read somewhere that the Russian built subway stations in both Moscow and St. Petersburg very deeply in the ground so they could be used as bomb shelters.
Moscow has really, really deep subway stations. I read somewhere that the Russian built subway stations in both Moscow and St. Petersburg very deeply in the ground so they could be used as bomb shelters.
Jan 18, 2006 | 3:27 pm
#3
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YYZ
Posts: 6,149
Hong Kong's system is very user-friendly, as is Singapore's. I dislike the systems in Chicago and London because the cars seem so claustrophobic. Is it just me or do the trains in those cities seem to be built to a smaller scale than most others?
Jan 18, 2006 | 3:40 pm
#4
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, U.K.
Programs: bmi British Midland International Diamond Club
Posts: 3,443
I like Hong Kong and Singapore's systems: air-conditioning is something of a luxury on a tube train to me. Tokyo's great as well, but can be a bit overwhelming due to the sheer size of it. Shanghai has a nice system too, except that people don't actually let you off the train first before they push and shove their way on. New York is good too. So's BART.
Jan 18, 2006 | 3:47 pm
#6
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: DC
Programs: Amtrak slumbercoach value club
Posts: 1,174
Originally Posted by YYZC2
...I dislike the systems in Chicago and London because the cars seem so claustrophobic. Is it just me or do the trains in those cities seem to be built to a smaller scale than most others?
Funny, though - after spending time in Chicago, once I get back to DC the metro cars seem to be about a mile long, and actually THAT kind of bothers me more. Also worth noting that here, because of the length of the cars, there's a perpetual problem with people bunching around the doors - a fear by many, I guess, that they'll get jammed into the interior of the car and not be able to get out in time once it gets to their stop .
Jan 18, 2006 | 5:01 pm
#7
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Programs: United MileagePlus Silver, Nexus, Global Entry
Posts: 8,810
>what systems are memorable to you?
Mexico City - Absolutely PACKED and full of vendors selling everything under the sun.
Prague (October 1990) - Cost under a dime, stations gleaming white ceramic tiles.
Cheers,
Geoff Glave
Vancouver, Canada
Mexico City - Absolutely PACKED and full of vendors selling everything under the sun.
Prague (October 1990) - Cost under a dime, stations gleaming white ceramic tiles.
Cheers,
Geoff Glave
Vancouver, Canada
Jan 18, 2006 | 6:56 pm
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 42,569
Santiago de Chile has a really nice system with frequent, inexpensive, clean and new trains, with flat screen monitors playing music and other videos in the stations. The system is also undergoing a substantial expansion, which it needs.
Buenos Aires reminds me of something that would have fit in perfectly in mid-century Soviet Union.
Buenos Aires reminds me of something that would have fit in perfectly in mid-century Soviet Union.
Jan 18, 2006 | 7:43 pm
#10
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: BOS
Programs: UAL 1P, NWA
Posts: 179
London: the Circle Line was the first of all. It is the only system that still has much of the Victorian era look.
Paris: On some lines there are no ends to the intermediate cars so it feels like you are riding in one long flexible tube.
Paris: On some lines there are no ends to the intermediate cars so it feels like you are riding in one long flexible tube.
Jan 18, 2006 | 8:27 pm
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: PVD
Programs: Priority Club Plat
Posts: 12,312
Originally Posted by YYZC2
I dislike the systems in Chicago and London because the cars seem so claustrophobic. Is it just me or do the trains in those cities seem to be built to a smaller scale than most others?
In London, it depends on which line you ride. Some, like the Circle Line is built by digging from the street - they take full-sized cars. Others, like the Metropolitan (oldest) is tunneled deep underground. The cars are definitely much smaller in cross-section.
Anyways, I'm most impressed by NYC's 4-track layout with express trains running in the middle. Cuts a lot of time between stations between Mid-town and Downtown. [Like whenever I ride the Hong Kong subway, I wish they had express tracks between Kowloon Tong and Central, with stops at only Mongkok and Admiralty.]
Jan 18, 2006 | 8:47 pm
#12
Join Date: Oct 2003
Programs: MP, 1K 1MM
Posts: 1,255
... a titch surprised
...that YYZC2 didn't plump for T'ronna's Metro-eh?
True, the TTA powers that be seem for some years now to have made a political football out of the issue of providing service from downtown Toronto all the way oot ( read: "out") to Pearson International--not there yet! And the cost of a ride rises at a frankly surprising rate; on our annual visits I buy a buncha tokens which offer a great ROI from year to year...
Still, full marks for clean, comfy, convenient and safety conscious; I don't remember seeing a "DWA' in London, Hong Kong, Paris, or Singapore.
^
True, the TTA powers that be seem for some years now to have made a political football out of the issue of providing service from downtown Toronto all the way oot ( read: "out") to Pearson International--not there yet! And the cost of a ride rises at a frankly surprising rate; on our annual visits I buy a buncha tokens which offer a great ROI from year to year...
Still, full marks for clean, comfy, convenient and safety conscious; I don't remember seeing a "DWA' in London, Hong Kong, Paris, or Singapore.
^
Jan 18, 2006 | 8:50 pm
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HH Diamond, Marriott, IHG, Hyatt something
Posts: 34,505
Moscows seemed to be pretty fast. And I've never more people on more subway cars than here, or as frequent service. And you can buy dried mushrooms from the little old lady between stations!
Jan 19, 2006 | 12:06 am
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Off the top of my mind, I've used the following within the last 12 months:
Boston's
Buenos Aires'
Chicago's
Delhi's
London's
Moscow's
NYC's
Paris'
Rome's
Santiago's
Singapore's
Stockholm's
Tokyo's
Washington's
... and probably a few more are memorable.
Boston's
Buenos Aires'
Chicago's
Delhi's
London's
Moscow's
NYC's
Paris'
Rome's
Santiago's
Singapore's
Stockholm's
Tokyo's
Washington's
... and probably a few more are memorable.