Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

US: Full visa needed for 2 hour transit!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

US: Full visa needed for 2 hour transit!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 1:46 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: DCA
Posts: 1,413
Originally Posted by graraps
There MUST be people travelling between Asia and S. America! Surely it'd make sense for a major Asian airline to fly to MEX or EZE with codeshared connections, wouldn't it?
JL is the only Asian carrier into MEX. MH had a short episode in the 90's, with a KUL-TPE-LAX-MEX flight. No longer. Most people who travel from CA/Mexico to Asia go through LAX/SFO I imagine.
chtiet is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 2:13 pm
  #17  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: between DCA and BWI
Programs: SPG Gold, Hyatt Plat, UA Premier, Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,652
I am a little confused, wouldn't you fall under the visa waiver program as a European, even when just transiting?
yevlesh2 is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 2:23 pm
  #18  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,445
Originally Posted by yevlesh2
I am a little confused, wouldn't you fall under the visa waiver program as a European, even when just transiting?
There are two separate issues being discussed here and many other threads.

1) US unlike many (most?) other countries requires international transit (by this I mean overseas to US to overseas) passengers to pass through customs & immigration (actually twice). Most other places I have transited you can stay airside and not have the hassle. This includes places with large airports where you need to change terminals.

2) While VWP exists, it has been massively watered down due to the requirements for bio data (no passports have these yet for some months or years to come) - hence nearly every foreigner is having to submit to fingerprint and eye scan.

Taken together it means international transit through US (eg from NZ to europe) is a major PITA. Contrast this to transiting through asia where it is a breeze. Many people I know (myself included) now avoid US altogether as far as is possible, due to these hassles.
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 2:27 pm
  #19  
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: W29
Programs: It's Complicated...
Posts: 7,181
I am a little confused on the suggestions for transiting via Canada. Canada pretty much has the same rules as the US dont they? You have to go through immigration even if you are transiting and depending on what country you are a citizen of you are required to have a visa. As far as I can tell it is basically the same visa. I was looking at some itins to Asia and considered going via YVR and my wife is on a Thai visa so that was the info I dug up and why we didnt transit via Canada.

Also, what country is your citizenship? Are you even required to have a visa? I would think the list that Canada has for visas is the same as the US.
mcgahat is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 2:29 pm
  #20  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,445
Originally Posted by mcgahat
Also, what country is your citizenship? Are you even required to have a visa? I would think the list that Canada has for visas is the same as the US.
As mentioned above, not having a visa does not equal hassle free transit (or entry for that matter) to US. Whereas for other countries it does.
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 2:45 pm
  #21  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Soon to be LEGT
Posts: 10,928
Originally Posted by Sjoerd
AF and KL offer many connections via CDG and AMS.
But RTW tix require you to take a trans-pacific segment!!!
graraps is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 3:05 pm
  #22  
500k
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Da Nang, Vietnam
Programs: Vietnam Airlines Lotusmiles Platinum
Posts: 2,426
Originally Posted by graraps
But RTW tix require you to take a trans-pacific segment!!!
Thats why they are called RTW
Cris L is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 3:06 pm
  #23  
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: W29
Programs: It's Complicated...
Posts: 7,181
Originally Posted by Kiwi Flyer
As mentioned above, not having a visa does not equal hassle free transit (or entry for that matter) to US. Whereas for other countries it does.

I agree but my point is that the same goes for Canada. I have been through Canadian immigration many many times and have had more hassle than any other country I have ever visited. I just feel like avoiding the US to transit via Canada is not gaining a lot for the OP.
mcgahat is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 3:19 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,673
Originally Posted by yevlesh2
I am a little confused, wouldn't you fall under the visa waiver program as a European, even when just transiting?
Not all Europeans qualify for visa waivers.


Originally Posted by mcgahat
I just feel like avoiding the US to transit via Canada is not gaining a lot for the OP.
It would, to begin with, save several months' wait for an interview for the right to apply for an US visa; non-nationals get 3rd class treatment at US embassies even in their country of residence. Canada doesn't require visas for a much broader range of countries than the US.
monahos is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 3:21 pm
  #25  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,445
We are talking about transits, not visits. And the immigration you get between Canada and US (at least in that direction) is US immigration anyways!!
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 3:37 pm
  #26  
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: W29
Programs: It's Complicated...
Posts: 7,181
Does Canada differentiate between the two(transit and visit)? The way I read it Visit and Transit was the same process, I have never transited via Canada so cant say for sure but you still need to go through immigration like everyone else. When you enter Canada from the the US you are harassed by Canadian immigrationa (at least suspicious folks such as me are) and when you enter the US from Canada you are harrased by US immigration.

I guess I am just curious why people would think the process would be "better" via Canada as it seams to really be the same as the US process.

Edited to mention that I agree with monahos's statement on the US visa process. I may wife being Thai I painfully understand that but depending on the nationality of the OP could be a different topic...I do find this a curious topic and am trying to get more details than anything else as it does affect my travels quite a bit as well.

Last edited by mcgahat; Sep 30, 2004 at 3:43 pm
mcgahat is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 3:48 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB PLT again afater a decade as plebian
Posts: 22,942
Originally Posted by mcgahat
The way I read it Visit and Transit was the same process, I have never transited via Canada so cant say for sure but you still need to go through immigration like everyone else. When you enter Canada from the the US you are harassed by Canadian immigrationa (at least suspicious folks such as me are) and when you enter the US from Canada you are harrased by US immigration.
Canada's visa process is a lot easier for various non-VWP country citizens than the U.S.'s. The U.S. also has a USD100 non-refundable visa application fee which you lose if your transit visa application is rejected. I believe you also need your ticket in hand so if you buy a non-refundable and the visa is rejected, you can end up losing a lot of money.

That said, YVR has sterile transit at least for U.S.-int'l and you can bypass Canadian immigration for int'l-U.S. (to go straight to U.S. pre-clearance). I don't know about whether int'l-int'l sterile transit is available (as very few flights would make sense).

YUL has sterile transit at least for passengers travelling between St. Pierre and CDG.

Not sure what YYZ has or will have (when the AC terminal is rebuilt).

Last edited by terenz; Sep 30, 2004 at 3:53 pm
YVR Cockroach is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 4:16 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 1,393
Originally Posted by graraps
There MUST be people travelling between Asia and S. America! Surely it'd make sense for a major Asian airline to fly to MEX or EZE with codeshared connections, wouldn't it? :eek:
KUL-EZE MH201 on Sundays & Wednesdays. departs KUL at 1:05AM, so good inbound connections from other Asian cities. The return flight (MH202) departs also on Sun. & Wed. from EZE, and arrives KUL the following morning at 6:20AM, again a good arrival time to connect to other Asian cities.
Mr. Roboto is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 4:26 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,673
MH's KUL-EZE flight is via South Africa, and thus over the Atlantic, i.e. won't qualify as the transpac leg on a RTW.
monahos is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 7:49 pm
  #30  
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Exile
Posts: 16,064
Originally Posted by mcgahat
Does Canada differentiate between the two(transit and visit)? The way I read it Visit and Transit was the same process.
The key difference between a Canadian VISITOR visa and a Canadian TRANSIT visa is that the latter is FREE of all fees and can be processed by mail in most cases.
B747-437B is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.