Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Air Pricing Insanity

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Air Pricing Insanity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2002 | 1:17 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 44,555
Air Pricing Insanity

Consider: Search for lowest fare via Orbitz

NY to Montreal (668 miles RT) or
NY to London (6940 miles RT)

Dates:
Depart 12/11/02 (Wed.)
Return 12/17/02 (Tues.)
37-day advance purchase

LGA - YUL
Base fare - $158, taxes $38, fee $5 = 201

JFK - LHR
Base fare - $213, taxes $91, fee $5 = 309

United was cheapest for both.

Why is flying to Montreal, per mile, more than six times as expensive as flying to London??

Even calculating cost/mile on the base fare only, subtracting taxes and fees, the cost for flying to Montreal is even MORE expensive, 7.5 times as expensive.

What happened to economies of scale?...

[This message has been edited by anonplz (edited 11-04-2002).]
anonplz is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2002 | 1:57 pm
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Potomac Falls, VA
Programs: AA Plat 2MM, MR Gold, Avis Pref
Posts: 41,109
I take it this is in US Currency????
TrojanHorse is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2002 | 2:18 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 44,555
Oh, yes. Orbitz performs fare searches in US Dollars only.
anonplz is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2002 | 6:00 pm
  #4  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Silver. (Former UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat)
Posts: 9,560
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by anonplz:
Why is flying to Montreal, per mile, more than six times as expensive as flying to London??</font>
Market forces. Supply and Demand.

Additionally, you're looking at a single fare with no idea what percentage of the seats on those routes go for that price. For a realistic comparison you need to compare yield (average fare paid per mile) for each route. As you know, the average often varies significantly from any single data point.

LarryJ is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2002 | 6:43 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 44,555
Setting aside the important element of yield/seat, the question is begged: why hasn't supply increased to take advantage of the apparently-great demand? Are these the types of situations airlines look at in deciding which destinations to add? Is there protectionism at work?
anonplz is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2002 | 7:57 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Bryn Mawr PA & Wailea HI
Posts: 15,726
Dont know re YUL-NYC, but winter fares to London are always cheap and conversly summer fares to London are always not cheap. They typically cost 2X to 4X more in Summer.

MisterNice
MisterNice is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2002 | 10:16 pm
  #7  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
London is always dirt cheap in the winter, this past weekend the weekend specials had it for $229, total round trip cost, all taxes included, from New York. Train to Washington and back costs more.

There is no rhyme or reason to airline fares, or else a flight from new York to London with the connection in San Francisco on both legs wouldn't cost less then round trip from new York to San Francisco.

One of the beauties is the cost isn't mileage based anymore, so there are some very good deals out there.
cordelli is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 9:32 pm
  #8  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Silver. (Former UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat)
Posts: 9,560
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by cordelli:
One of the beauties is the cost isn't mileage based anymore, so there are some very good deals out there.</font>
It is based on mileage when you look at the averages. There are significant variations in the individual examples but it all averages out when you look at all of the fares and all of the flights over a longer period of time. The trick is finding the variations in your favor and avoiding the rest.
LarryJ is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2002 | 10:08 pm
  #9  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
Averages have nothing to do with specific flights. London is something like 40% more miles from me then San Diego is, and is usually considerably less money.

cordelli is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 9:11 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Massachusetts, USA; AA 2.996MM & Plat Pro, DL 1MM, GM & Flying Colonel
Posts: 25,037
Somebody is actually looking for logic in air fare pricing?

It's based on all the above factors, plus more - such as:

- the degree to which flights tend to be a matter of choice. Florida is often cheap because vacationers who go there could go somewhere else instead. Flights that draw mostly business travelers tend to cost more per mile.

- overall demand on the route, which can allow airlines to use larger aircraft - reducing cost per mile, if they can fill them, in turn reinforcing lower pricing to attract passengers.

(As an example of the Florida effect, I recently flew BOS-SEA with no Saturday night stay. Connecting through Chicago westbound, AA's fare was $400 less via Orlando than with a BOS-ORD nonstop, with the same flight ORD-SEA. Go figure. (As a loyal FT'er, I took the savings and the miles.)
Efrem is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 9:22 am
  #11  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London, England.
Programs: BA
Posts: 8,779
I've never got a satisfactory answer to why airlines in the UK (BA especially) always put on a long face when talking about short-haul flights, say they lose money on them, while Transatlantic flights are described as their money-spinners, post-9/11 blip apart.

It costs me MORE for a BA flight from London to Edinburgh (350 miles) return than it does from London to Miami return (4,000 miles)! Yet the crews do 4 sectors in a day on these internal flights. The load factor is often higher.
WHBM is offline  
Old Nov 7, 2002 | 10:24 pm
  #12  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Silver. (Former UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat)
Posts: 9,560
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by cordelli:
Averages have nothing to do with specific flights.</font>
Of course not, that's why they're called averages.

If you average the yield on longer routes and compare to the average yield on shorter routes you will see the coorelation between distance and fare. When you look at a specific market, or even worse--a specific ticket, then you will have large differences in the per mile cost due to the specific supply/demand situtation in that market.
LarryJ is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.