Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Low Loads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2001 | 10:10 am
  #1  
Original Poster
30 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Programs: AA Lifetime Platinum (3MM), QF Lifetime Gold, Bonvoy Lifetime Platinum, Ex-Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 7,811
Low Loads

One of the side things that struck me about the crashed flights was the low loads. Shows how bad things must have been for the airline industry before the crashes.

I hope Congress provides sonme financial relief. Our economy and our lifestyles are dependant on a relatively healthy air transportation system.

nologic is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2001 | 1:53 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: DAB / MCO - DL PM
Posts: 26
As part of the US Gov't airline "bailout" program all airline executives should have their pay cut to the level of a US Senator or Congressman (heck, even the level of the President works).

Airline CEO's (along with other industry CEO's) rarely cut their pay in times of crisis or economic downturn, but they sure will shaft their loyal employees and produce massive layoffs (recent MSNBC article puts US airline toll at approx. 100,000 layoffs).

$1.0 million in CEO pay goes a long way in paying reservation agents and FA's...$5.0 million goes even further!

Airline CEO's need to get real and give up the big bucks to support their industry and loyal staff members!


------------------
Wherever you go, there you are.
DLho is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2001 | 2:32 pm
  #3  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,085


And I don't buy the CEOs' defense that "but we only get paid based on how well the airline is doing financially! So if the airline is doing poorly we don't make that much money". Bulls**t.

I know that's part of the package, but I'm sure they've still got their country club memberships, vacation homes, and sports cars.
They're definitely not hurting in the $ department.


jetsetter777 is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2001 | 2:50 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 7,149
Didn't the airline choose the crappy security which allowed this to happen to save money in the first place.

They took their chances by hiring these folks to ensure their planes were secure.

Now they want a bailout? Hmmmm..... Kind of like the morons who live in a Floodplain without flood insurance, who then go crying to FEMA to rebuild their houses at our expense. They get a free ride, while more responsible homeowners help shoulder the bill for them.

I think a pay cut for CEO's is in order before layoffs. Particularly if they're getting more of my tax money.
BoSoxFan45 is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2001 | 5:06 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hermitage, TN, USA
Posts: 320
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by BoSoxFan45:
[B]Didn't the airline choose the crappy security which allowed this to happen to save money in the first place.

They took their chances by hiring these folks to ensure their planes were secure.

B]</font>
I am getting so tired of hearing this. The hijackers broke no FAA security regulations.

End of story.
egarrett is offline  
Old Sep 22, 2001 | 10:26 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Nashville -Past DL Plat, FO, WN-CP, various hotel programs
Programs: DL-MM, AA, SW w/companion,HiltonDiamond, Hyatt PLat, IHF Plat, Miles and Points Seeker
Posts: 11,405
AND - they could still get through again today. Of course, the chance of the passengers tolerating their actions is another story.

But security has not changed. Just the hassles.
NoStressHere is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.