FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   TravelBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz-176/)
-   -   A340 lower deck (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz/289860-a340-lower-deck.html)

deubster Apr 5, 2010 3:40 pm


Originally Posted by PropWasher (Post 13714380)
AC used lower deck crew modules on the A340. Loaded through cargo door.

My memory is a bit fuzzy but there is a hatch (to the main deck) that disables the drive system, in the cargo bay, if it's left unlocked.

Is this like the breathalyzer ignition interlock system on NW aircraft? :D

alanh Apr 5, 2010 4:25 pm

There would probably be issues with evacuation paths if they opened up the lower deck to passengers.

trooper Apr 5, 2010 4:42 pm

The lower deck crew rest modules also lead to those marvellous "missing seats" in Y (..well... marvellous if you get the extra legroom so created...;))

..as the escape hatch from the module has to come up somewhere!

sbm12 Apr 5, 2010 5:52 pm

The downstairs bathrooms on the A346 is fun. :)

http://boardingarea.com/blogs/thewan...1435-thumb.jpg

tonywestsider Apr 5, 2010 10:51 pm


Originally Posted by sbm12 (Post 13715302)
The downstairs bathrooms on the A346 is fun. :)

http://boardingarea.com/blogs/thewan...1435-thumb.jpg

That's a really nice stairway. ^

jetismyname Apr 6, 2010 9:22 am


Originally Posted by MLang2 (Post 13708203)
Yes Lufthansa's A346 has some lavatories down there. I like these, because they are more spacious than the "normal" ones.

Additionally, there are the Crew Rests down there and there is also an elevator to bring up the catering.

Yup was on an A340 FRA-DEN flight on Lufthansa where they had these...

TMOliver Apr 6, 2010 9:48 am

Vaguely, and it's been too many years, I recall some lower deck facilities/acommodations in the old Boeing Stratocruiser (military C-97), recognizable for its "Double Bubble" fuselage, and kept around in modernized form - upper fuselage swollen) for decades as "Guppies" and "Super Guppies" in freighter service for oversized loads.

CyBeR Apr 6, 2010 12:33 pm


Originally Posted by nlp (Post 2553288)
I still don't understand. How much do airlines make from their cargo business? I think the revenue from passengers should be more.

Are you kidding? Cargo is much more profitable than hauling around people:

* It doesn't need food
* It doesn't need to be cleaned-up after
* It doesn't need seats
* It doesn't need cabin heating
* It doesn't care about the IFE (or lack thereof)
* It doesn't complain about legroom
* It doesn't need toilets
* It doesn't ask the FAs for more drinks
* It doesn't care if it's a few hours late (most of the time)

etc.

KL, in fact, has 747s that are partly for people and then they've decided that using the back of the passenger deck for cargo is more profitable than fitting a couple dozen people in there.

gglave Apr 6, 2010 3:31 pm

Also, cargo doesn't complain if the pilots fly through bad weather instead of around it...

djk7 Apr 6, 2010 8:00 pm


Originally Posted by greg99 (Post 2553294)
I believe that, in order for the a/c to be certified to carry pax in seats on a lower deck that can be occupied for t/o and landing, the framing of the aircraft would have to be reinforced so that it could withstand a belly landing without crushing the pax sitting on the lower deck.

This is my understanding too, the lower deck can be used during flight, but is not certified for passenger use during takeoff and landing, and would require structural modification to make the certification.

tonywestsider Apr 7, 2010 12:00 am

I recall reading somewhere that back in the day, UA sometimes flew Boeing 377 Stratocruisers between LAX and SFO as turnaround flights to/from Hawaii. UA would sell seats in the lower deck lounge of the 377, which had banquette seating equipped with seat belts and the nearby bar in the lounge.

davidavid237 Apr 7, 2010 12:56 am


Originally Posted by pacolawrence (Post 13708164)
I Was on a LH a-340 and went in a lavatory on the lower deck

Wow, welcome back nine-year old thread!

The Hindenburg had passenger cabins on both the A Deck and the B Deck below.

CyBeR Apr 7, 2010 3:22 am


Originally Posted by davidavid237 (Post 13724541)
Wow, welcome back nine-year old thread!

Oh wow, I didn't even see that.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:18 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.