Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Is It Time For More Onboard Security?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Is It Time For More Onboard Security?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2000 | 7:33 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 19
Is It Time For More Onboard Security?


With the many recent stories about "air rage," in one case (Alaska Airlines) a passenger attacks the crew on the flight deck, is it time to put security people onboard the airlines? I think this was done at one time to prevent hijackings.

The Alaska Airlines incident could have been devastating for all on board. It was horrible that it happened at all.

If the airlines decide security would help, should the security people be armed, uniformed? Or would that make things potentially worse?

Interested in your comments, thanks.
Island Girl is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2000 | 2:55 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oxford, UK CO Gold, AS MVP, KL RW and AZ nothing, plus Airmiles collector !! With the AZ / KL split now who knows ?
Posts: 163
SAA at one time had an OUT of uniform security person on board - who was armed !

This security person was NOT known to flight personnel, and was a regular pax - i.e. a purchased ticket !

This was for ALL flights both Domestic and International.

I know this because my cousin did this job, and you had to do 50 domestic flights before you got an international flight. He hated flying ! He quit before he got an international flight ! silly **** !!

I was told that it was quite lucrative as the basic pay was pretty good + clothing allowance + paid travel + per diem + paid 5 star accomodations, and on international trips you were expected to stay away for a while - e.g London was at least 4 days ( I seem to recall !

While this was all scheduled, it was also at random, so that on 1 trip you might stay the min 4 days, the next time it might be 2 weeks, in order that there be no discernible patterns.

I wanted a job like that so bad, ( for the travel), but then I am a wuss when it comes to guns !!

Perhaps a uniformed guard would be a good idea now with all the "air-rage" folks
Chris L is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2000 | 2:57 pm
  #3  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Programs: AA2MM
Posts: 1,754
There are already so called Air Marshels on board US domestic and international flights, plain clothes people of course. And some carriers have armed guards on board as well (ie: El Al), others have side-arms in a safe in the cockpit (ie: Qantas, I beleive).
burkey is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2000 | 3:11 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oxford, UK CO Gold, AS MVP, KL RW and AZ nothing, plus Airmiles collector !! With the AZ / KL split now who knows ?
Posts: 163
The US Air Marshalls are obviously not on ALL flights or the Alaska airlines rage attack wouldn't have happened ?

I have not heard of this before in the US, but it is a good idea !

El Al yes, of course - goes without saying ! Israeli paranoia ( just like that of South Africa )

Qantas - had not heard that previously

Chris L is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2000 | 1:21 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 121
Plain Clothes and armed in the Air and throughout the air termanal. ZERO TOLERANCE for any form of air rage. If people get out of hand, take their luggage and them off of the plane or do not let them board and they dont get to fly. They loose their flight privledes for 1 year. Give them a fine and or jail time. ZERO TOLERANCE.
Loihi is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.