![]() |
Originally Posted by SSF556
(Post 32321051)
Again there is no way humanly possible to prevent the spread of a virus.
|
What a great idea! As long as you're smart and take simple precautions I think you will be fine! Also gas is so cheap right now what better time? Just know that I'll be pretty envious, since I've been home since March.
|
Originally Posted by SSF556
(Post 32321051)
Why aren't you blaming the FA who has made the decision to work?
I mean, if I really wanted to, I could quit working for a while and still support myself financially, but I recognize that doesn't apply for many people. |
Originally Posted by LondonElite
(Post 32321089)
Except that is precisely what we are going by preventing unnecessary contact and good hygiene. If the virus has nowhere to go, it eventually dies out. If patient zero (assuming there was only one) had gone home and isolated for a month, there would have been no spread.
|
Originally Posted by Zorak
(Post 32321159)
"Made the decision" to work? Check your privilege. :rolleyes:
I mean, if I really wanted to, I could quit working for a while and still support myself financially, but I recognize that doesn't apply for many people. |
Originally Posted by pgh234
(Post 32321173)
I have not read a single thing from the government or any sort of scientist saying that should be any sort of attainable goal we strive for (re having the virus die out). If your view point is the virus must die out before you can leave the house...then we must all live off the grid, grow our own food, forgo Amazon deliveries, close hospitals, etc. That is some crazy conspiracy stuff there.
|
What most governments around the world are saying is that the best way to mitigate this is to slow the spread now, in hopes of two of three things: 1) a vaccine, 2) widespread, easily accessible testing, and 3) a cure or palliatives to reduce the lung/oxygen flow part of the disease. You probably need two of three.
A vaccine is maybe 12 months away, although most are hedging out to 18 months minimum; a cure or palliatives could be a few months away if certain morons get out of the way and stop enticing people to straight inject themselves with disinfectant or create shortages of medicines for people who actually need them right now; and widespread, easily accessible testing should have been available a month ago, if the initial response hadn't been so thoroughly botched. We need two of those three things before we can just throw open the doors. Obviously COVID is not flu, because flu has an annual vaccine, its fatality rate now appears to be much lower than COVID, and it's easy to test for flu. When COVID is like this, then and only then can you say "COVID is like flu." |
Originally Posted by DenverBrian
(Post 32321200)
What most governments around the world are saying is that the best way to mitigate this is to slow the spread now, in hopes of two of three things: 1) a vaccine, 2) widespread, easily accessible testing, and 3) a cure or palliatives to reduce the lung/oxygen flow part of the disease. You probably need two of three.
A vaccine is maybe 12 months away, although most are hedging out to 18 months minimum; a cure or palliatives could be a few months away if certain morons get out of the way and stop enticing people to straight inject themselves with disinfectant or create shortages of medicines for people who actually need them right now; and widespread, easily accessible testing should have been available a month ago, if the initial response hadn't been so thoroughly botched. We need two of those three things before we can just throw open the doors. Obviously COVID is not flu, because flu has an annual vaccine, its fatality rate now appears to be much lower than COVID, and it's easy to test for flu. When COVID is like this, then and only then can you say "COVID is like flu." |
Originally Posted by LondonElite
(Post 32320939)
I'm really saddened by the selfishness of people who defy common sense advisories and put themselves and others at risk justifying it with some notion of liberty and freedom. Give me a break and try to come together on this.
Originally Posted by pgh234
(Post 32320960)
A soft reopening as we control the "fresh eruptions and deaths" is what we need to do. Deaths will occur.
Originally Posted by pgh234
(Post 32320974)
It is shame you can't understand that those hotel and airline employees also observing distancing and hygiene rules also need to provide for their family.
For the love of God don't make things any riskier for them. |
Originally Posted by SSF556
(Post 32321182)
No privilege....Delta is not making people work, they are giving people the opportunity to decide to work. All I am saying is you can't blame the passenger....
Originally Posted by BearX220
(Post 32321228)
I know people in the airline business and they are terrified of coming to work. (They do not "choose to work"; they have groceries to buy and rent is due.)
|
Originally Posted by SSF556
(Post 32321051)
That is uncalled for and really should be viewed by the Site Staff as a removable post. Why aren't you blaming the FA who has made the decision to work? Or what about the pilots who are flying the plane or the GA or the TSA guy/gal....see the problem with your attack? Again there is no way humanly possible to prevent the spread of a virus.
What it boils down to is whether someone is only concerned with their own risk or their impact on public health. This is a public health crisis and people focusing only on themselves instead of how their actions impact everyone else are just causing things to go on longer and be more shutdown than they would be otherwise. A lot more stores could remain open if people actually limited themselves to essential trips and wore masks when they did go out. |
This is a very interesting thread. I can see both sides of the debate.
|
Originally Posted by Zorak
(Post 32321264)
You don't get it. Having the luxury to choose whether or not to work *is* privilege. If the travel is essential, that's one thing, but taking discretionary trips is another.
Exactly. What is essential to me may not be essential to you...that is what makes life in America awesome. There are hundreds of countries that you can move to that will take that opportunity from you. They will tell you what is essential and what is not essential! Next! |
I think the one factor you may be overlooking is the simple fact that people in the small towns you will be passing through almost certainly do not want you or anyone else visiting. If you plan on sleeping in the car and limiting your dining options to drive-thru's and gas stations, you would probably be OK. But definitely do not expect anyone to welcome you into their town/restaurant/hotel. I completely sympathize with you, but I think a camping adventure in a very desolate place is about the only viable option at this point, assuming you can locate a place to camp.
|
Originally Posted by JesseRohr
(Post 32321026)
Any of our Japanese F-Talkers care to chime in on the status of things? Japan gave the proverbial middle finger to lock downs.
Source: https://www.ft.com/content/9bac4ad5-...T9io3UQ3mTvl5A |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:41 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.