Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Will airlines be forced to remove rows and middle seats in the future?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Will airlines be forced to remove rows and middle seats in the future?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2020 | 8:47 pm
  #46  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,059
Originally Posted by Allanf
Wouldn’t it be great if congress mandated humane seat width and seat pitch as a requirement for government subsidization. Maybe the silver lining will be reduced seat density offset by increase in ticket prices. Not sure about the math but 1/3 more seat room offset by 1/3 higher ticket prices, or whatever the ratio should be, seems reasonable to me.
Rightly or wrongly, most of the travelling public chose on price alone so it's unlikely to happen.
ft101 is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2020 | 8:50 am
  #47  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Spire Ambassador, Global Entry
Posts: 4,337
Here's a question for everyone who takes everything "social distancing" as bible. Would you take a plane ride with someone who knowingly has it, but is 6 feet away? All of your slowing the spread and flattening the curve are all useful for the big picture. Be reasonable about your reality though.
Super Mario is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2020 | 10:05 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wonderful Weald of kent
Programs: BAEC Bronze
Posts: 989
UK budget airline EasyJet has announced that when it resumes services, they will initially be blocking the middle seats on their flights.
CarolynUK is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2020 | 8:38 pm
  #49  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,059
Originally Posted by CarolynUK
UK budget airline EasyJet has announced that when it resumes services, they will initially be blocking the middle seats on their flights.
The airline said the possible move was still under discussion. "Nothing is decided," the spokesperson said.
https://edition.cnn.com/travel/artic...eat/index.html
ft101 is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2020 | 12:46 am
  #50  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 802
I wouldn't mind if the middle seats were blocked off permanently. The airlines would have to fly more planes to serve the demand when it goes back to normal in a year
nd2010 is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2020 | 1:33 pm
  #51  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Nashua, NH USA
Programs: Seashore Trolley Museum "flight attendant"
Posts: 2,015
Originally Posted by ft101
Rightly or wrongly, most of the traveling public chose on price alone so it's unlikely to happen.
This includes most companies, which pay for employee business trips only for the cheapest air fare.
AllanJ is offline  
Old May 6, 2020 | 11:45 pm
  #52  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,163
Originally Posted by Often1
The premise of this thread is that someone read a post on some other website in which some person said that something might happen. It's just another post with no factual basis whatsoever.

Even if carriers do implement some form of distancing for a short period of time, there is no reason to remove seats in order to do that and then restore those seats when this is over. Moreover, as pointed out, these distancing efforts do not even meet minimum guidelines so are just a sop to make people feel better about flying when the real answer is that they should not fly at all.
If the cost of removing, storing, and replacing seats is less than the cost of the fuel saved flying them around, then airlines will remove them. Given current fuel prices, that's unlikely.
sethb is offline  
Old May 6, 2020 | 11:49 pm
  #53  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,163
Originally Posted by ZZYZXROAD
Way off? The reason I mentioned remove the seat was to ensure no one can sit in it.

Looks like they are blacking them out. If they don't remove them will they tarp them over to make sure? They are going to have to police it if they leave them in, right?
Why would they want to prevent me from sitting next to my wife?
ajGoes likes this.
sethb is offline  
Old May 7, 2020 | 12:01 am
  #54  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,163
Originally Posted by CEB
But if people stop to look at the DATA and ignore the EMOTION, you will see that since January, here in the USA, 5 times as many people have died of common influenza (the flu) than have died of SARS-COV-2.
The CDC estimates that in the entire flu season (from October 1 though April 4) there were 24,000 - 62,000 flu deaths. As of yesterday, there were more than that coronavirus deaths, and the number of the latter is still increasing (estimated to hit 3,000/day by the end of May, and that doesn't take into account all the idiots who are breaking or ending quarantines).

The New York Times is a serious culprit here where they published a manipulated and patently false report, since promulgated across the world, that the common flu only kills less than 0.1 % of those who get it. They took the LOWEST reported death rate in the US from the flu (12,000 in the 2011-2012 flu season) and divided it by the HIGHEST reported flu infection rate (45,000,000 in the 2017-2018 flu season).
12,000 / 45,000,000 = 0.0267%

Estimates for this year are 39 million - 56 million illnesses, 24,000 - 62,000 flu deaths. At the low end for both, that's 0.0615%. At the high end for both, that's 1.1%. At the middle of the range for both, that's 0.09%. I'd say the New York Times numbers are quite reasonable, a lot better than your "five times" claim.

Reality is that the death rate from the common flu hovers between 0.9 and 1.2 % on a year to year basis (according to CDC data) which is approximately the same as SARS-COV-2.
Based on resolved cases, SARS-COV-2 is a lot more deadly.

Those who have taken these draconian military law measures will certainly say, 'look how many lives we saved.' But the reality is that they will have saved exactly zero lives. In the end, most of the people who would get SARS-COV-2 will still get it at some point in the next year or so. And those who will die form it will do so.
It's not like the extra time before someone catches it might mean a better treatment is available, or that the slowing down of infections means hospitals won't get overloaded. Not at all. /sarcasm

As MiamiAirport said, the misery index from these government actions (combined with public ignorance and media irresponsibility) already far outweighs the impact of SARS-COV-2.
What counts is the cost of the cases of SARS-COV-2 that were avoided due to the action.
sethb is offline  
Old May 7, 2020 | 8:16 pm
  #55  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,059
Originally Posted by sethb
If the cost of removing, storing, and replacing seats is less than the cost of the fuel saved flying them around, then airlines will remove them. Given current fuel prices, that's unlikely.
In general, seats don't come out as singles. They're manufactured and fitted in pairs, triples, quadruples etc. To remove middle seats airlines would require manufacturers to start from scratch and design and qualify new individual seats which is not a short term project and unlikely to happen given what we currently know about Covid.
writerguyfl and ajGoes like this.
ft101 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.