Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Pulled off plane because plane too heavy??

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Pulled off plane because plane too heavy??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2019 | 10:34 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New York, Ohio, & Fayetteville NC
Programs: Delta Platinum, SW (former) A-list
Posts: 71
Pulled off plane because plane too heavy??

This has never happened to me before--I was seated on a fairly small plane (2 seats on one side, 1 on the other) out of FAY and I had gotten on standby in order to have a longer connection in ATL, so my seat wasn't guaranteed in advance. But as we were just about to depart, they told me I had to get off again because the plane was too heavy. Does this happen a lot? I weigh 115 pounds--my checked luggage another 25 maybe. How do they calculate this, and why could they not know before I boarded that this might be an issue? It sucked to be all excited to have gotten on the flight and then I was so disappointed to have my hopes dashed and spend another 4 hours waiting in the FAY airport for my original confirmed flight. I assume I deserve no compensation since my seat was never guaranteed, right? Is this a common thing that happens?
flyingmontana is offline  
Old Feb 25, 2019 | 10:42 pm
  #2  
10 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: ANC
Programs: DL DM
Posts: 2,722
As a Captain for a regional I can say what you experienced is, while uncommon, not unheard of. We make every attempt to accommodate all passengers and bags with the required fuel amounts for the specific flight. Generally this is all sorted out before boarding commences, but on occasion, there are slip ups we find in the final checks requiring bags, mail, cargo, or passengers, to be offloaded. Generally non-revs are removed first. It sounds like in your case there were no non-revs (or at least I hope there weren't) and they had to remove a revenue standby. Sorry for the inconvenience you experienced! Sometimes weather, crew, and/or aircraft maintenance requirements necessitate more fuel than what was originally expected. I would say I see it affect bags/cargo on almost a weekly basis. As far as passengers go, I only see it a handful of times a year.
GagaPilot is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 3:46 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: KARB
Programs: DL 2MM
Posts: 26,991
All of DL regional jets (CRJ-200/700/900, EMB-170/175) are 2x2 in coach. AA has Piedmont ERJ-145's with 1x2 seating on FAY-CLT, but DL no longer has any such aircraft. Weight and balance issues are not uncommon on the regional aircraft. They base the weight savings on averages and have no clue how much each passenger actually weighs. No, you are not due IDB compensation as you did not have a confirmed booking on the flight. Also, if you were on a CRJ-200 (which appears to be case as all the regional flights on this route are currently Skywest CRJ-200's), aircraft 60 seats or under are exempted from DOT IDB rules if denied due to weight/balance issues (which should tell you that such issues are not uncommon for these aircraft).

Last edited by xliioper; Feb 26, 2019 at 4:00 am
xliioper is online now  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 5:31 am
  #4  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC/ PHL
Programs: UA Platinum, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 2,419
Wow! That's interesting!
MarkP24 is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 7:01 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,811
Several times on RJs I have been asked to change seats for balance. Have never been asked to deplane once boarded.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 7:03 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
As LBJ notes, there's a standard weight for adult passengers and a standard weight for checked bags on aircraft of more than 19 seats. The passenger weight is higher in winter -- I don't know if the FAA allows for winter coats or is fearful of seasonal carb consumption!
3Cforme is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 7:09 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
2M
50 Countries Visited
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 28,002
Originally Posted by 3Cforme
As LBJ notes, there's a standard weight for adult passengers and a standard weight for checked bags on aircraft of more than 19 seats. The passenger weight is higher in winter -- I don't know if the FAA allows for winter coats or is fearful of seasonal carb consumption!
Winter coats is one of the things that actually is taken account of.
flyingmontana likes this.
flyerCO is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 8:57 am
  #8  
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the path to perdition
Programs: Delta, United
Posts: 5,018
This issue happens not just on small aircraft but also larger ones. I have been on a 737 when people were off loaded.
FlyingUnderTheRadar is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 9:02 am
  #9  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
60 Nights
5M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
Originally Posted by flyerCO
Winter coats is one of the things that actually is taken account of.
Do they take account of the climate and weather at the origin and destination of the flight or (more sophisticated, but would be a better predictor of passenger's winter clothing) of each passenger's itinerary including connections?
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 9:15 am
  #10  
All eyes on you!
5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Programs: DL DM/MM, UA Gold, Bonvoy (lol) Titanium/LTP
Posts: 3,360
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
Do they take account of the climate and weather at the origin and destination of the flight or (more sophisticated, but would be a better predictor of passenger's winter clothing) of each passenger's itinerary including connections?
No, all major airlines just use a standard assumed weight for passengers and carry-ons together. In the winter they add something like 5 or 10 pounds to the average based on the idea that passengers have more "weight" on their person and in their carry-ons due to heavier clothes in the winter.

The overall average figure has been revised upward over time, but it may be due for another given the continued expansion of waistlines as well as heavier carry-ons due to checked bag fees. I think the last revision was around 2006.
flyingmontana likes this.
ethernal is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 9:24 am
  #11  
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
30 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 27,016
As this issue is relevant to many airlines, I am moving the thread to TravelBuzz
Obscure2k
Delta Moderator
flyingmontana likes this.
obscure2k is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 9:40 am
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB PLT again afater a decade as plebian
Posts: 22,946
Originally Posted by ethernal
No, all major airlines just use a standard assumed weight for passengers and carry-ons together. In the winter they add something like 5 or 10 pounds to the average based on the idea that passengers have more "weight" on their person and in their carry-ons due to heavier clothes in the winter.

The overall average figure has been revised upward over time, but it may be due for another given the continued expansion of waistlines as well as heavier carry-ons due to checked bag fees. I think the last revision was around 2006.
Not only assumed weight but the assumed weight builds in a huge safety margin. If the carrier used actual weight for everyone + bags (even allowing a large margin of error in weighing), I imagine you would have stayed on (and the flight could have filled more empty seats.
YVR Cockroach is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 12:13 pm
  #13  
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Midwest USA
Programs: BA Gold, United Plat, Marriott TIT (LT), Hilton GLD
Posts: 2,035
Originally Posted by YVR Cockroach
Not only assumed weight but the assumed weight builds in a huge safety margin. If the carrier used actual weight for everyone + bags (even allowing a large margin of error in weighing), I imagine you would have stayed on (and the flight could have filled more empty seats.

maybe in some places this is true. Not so much in the fast-food loving USA.
nachosdelux is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 12:55 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Programs: DL Gold, AA Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 253
Happened to me twice. Once a Dash-8 into LEB (NH not the country) and the first time on an MD-80 (really), both of these were back in the day. I remember on the MD80 flight the flight attendant came to my seat and said, quite loudly, "we're having some trouble with the weight distribution...YOU will have to move to first class." She really leaned on the "YOU" like I was the one causing all the problems. I was both embarrassed at the implication I was fat (an BTW, I'm 5-10, 155, so, you know, come on) but also grateful for the bump.
DCAFly is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2019 | 1:20 pm
  #15  
60 Nights
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 585
Was once flying ORD-CMI and AA offered me $900+ to take the next flight in an hour due to weight restrictions. I jumped at the opportunity but was told they ended up not needing any volunteers after the plane was loaded.
omghaxcode is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.