Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

what was wrong with the A380?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

what was wrong with the A380?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2019, 4:10 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston, Texas/Red Stick/airborne in-between
Programs: United Global Svs, AA PlatPro, WN RR, AZ/ITA Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG
Posts: 3,540
Cost, ROI, Economics, as all have said. Basically Boeing was right in that more people want to fly direct point-to-point versus connections as well. There is a reason the 330 does so well for Airbus, as well as the 787 for Boeing. The A380 does not make routes like Houston-Auckland, Austin-London, Nashville-London, Philadelphia-Prague, etc etc work. 787s and 330 NEOs do.
FlyingHoustonian is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2019, 4:36 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,695
The wing was engineered for the -900 so it is sub optimal on the -800, which is all they produce. Combine that with the inefficiency of 4 engines and you have a CASM nightmare at a very large gauge.

Last edited by audio-nut; Feb 16, 2019 at 6:08 pm
audio-nut is offline  
Old Feb 17, 2019, 3:36 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,304
One article I read said that even though it would lose money on it's own, it impacted sufficiently on 747 sales such that Boeing could not subsidise smaller aircraft costs using profits on the 747. As such, Airbus smaller aircraft sales rose making much 380 losses have much less impact than many think.
ft101 is offline  
Old Feb 17, 2019, 5:00 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CT USA
Posts: 2,577
I am sorry to see it go. In some ways I feel that engineering and taking a big chance on a new product seems to have almost completely died out.
Spanish likes this.
JumboJet is offline  
Old Feb 17, 2019, 6:41 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,209
The plane looks horrible but it is a pleasure to climb the stairs and enjoy a long haul flight on the second deck. It's smoother than any other airplane I've flown on and extremely quiet. I seek them out when I get the chance, which looks like it'll be happening less and less in the future.
travelinmanS is offline  
Old Feb 17, 2019, 7:39 pm
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,672
I wonder if some of the 0.01% will use some of their excess cash to buy/refurb an A380 as a super air limo to impress their friends?
DenverBrian is offline  
Old Feb 17, 2019, 8:04 pm
  #22  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 49,025
Originally Posted by 84fiero
Now that would have all the makings of a horror film! How about a packed-full Spirit A380 when passengers start to turn into zombies!
Don’t forget the snakes. Really big snakes on the really big plane. Or drunken elephants. Or all three.
84fiero likes this.
GadgetFreak is online now  
Old Feb 17, 2019, 9:23 pm
  #23  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: PDX
Programs: AS DL
Posts: 9,038
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
The plane looks horrible but it is a pleasure to climb the stairs and enjoy a long haul flight on the second deck. It's smoother than any other airplane I've flown on and extremely quiet. I seek them out when I get the chance, which looks like it'll be happening less and less in the future.
Originally Posted by DenverBrian
I wonder if some of the 0.01% will use some of their excess cash to buy/refurb an A380 as a super air limo to impress their friends?
The high end of the super rich may look at appearances and think that a 747-8i looks nicer than an A380. If I were in the high end of the super rich, I might lean towards a 747-8i or an A340-500. I'd be happy with a 737 BBJ MAX 7

Looks like there have been 11 deliveries of the 747-8i to VIPs versus none (?) of the A380. 12 deliveries of the 787, 13 of the 777.
FlyerEC, Yoshi212 and Spanish like this.
Toshbaf is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2019, 3:42 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,304
A380 private jet.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cert-hall.html
Spanish likes this.
ft101 is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2019, 5:59 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 581
Has he been let off the luxury jail ? I thought all of them have a travel ban in place and aren't allowed to leave Saudi. Maybe he can fly from one Saudi city to another !
JamesKidd is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2019, 10:06 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto
Programs: SPG LT Plat, Hilton G,Priorty Club G, AC E
Posts: 2,979
One thing not mentioned is that is wasn't easily convertible to cargo, something the 747 was.
HomerJ is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2019, 10:50 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,776
I can't see a Saudi buying a second hand A380. Airbus might give a really good deal on 1 if another cancelation occurs.

Originally Posted by JamesKidd
Has he been let off the luxury jail ? I thought all of them have a travel ban in place and aren't allowed to leave Saudi. Maybe he can fly from one Saudi city to another !
Yoshi212 is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2019, 5:32 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Long Beach, CA
Programs: AA PLTPRO, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Marriott Plat, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 3,559
Originally Posted by CPRich

Two modern 280 seat twin-engine flights are cheaper than a single 560 seat quad-engine flight.
This is a pretty vivid and succinct example. Other than slot-restricted airports, when does it make financial sense to operate the A380?
OskiBear is online now  
Old Feb 19, 2019, 7:43 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,776
When those two twin-engine planes can be sent elsewhere making significantly more money.

Originally Posted by OskiBear
This is a pretty vivid and succinct example. Other than slot-restricted airports, when does it make financial sense to operate the A380?
Yoshi212 is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2019, 12:37 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 167
Originally Posted by CPRich
Cost to operate.

Two modern 280 seat twin-engine flights are cheaper than a single 560 seat quad-engine flight.

It's also restricted to major airports that have the capacity (runway/taxiway width, gate height, etc.) to manage such a large aircraft. Smaller long-range twins give flexibility to connect more and more long-range smaller airports. A 380 couldn't fly Hartford-Dublin (Aer Lingus), Oakland-Stockholm (Norwegian), etc.
Can you explain the physics of your first point? I would have assumed (and I'm obviously wrong) that 2 x 280 planes = greater weight = greater energy required to overcome gravity/drag? There is a marginal increase in weight to add each additional passenger with occasional discontinuities to add additional power. An unloaded 777 costs X per km, a 777 with 280 passengers on board doesn't cost 2x

Surely (for example) a single 560 seat quad engine 380 is cheaper than 140 4-seater prop puddle jumpers?
akl_traveller is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.