Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Layover options

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Layover options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2016 | 6:07 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 20
Layover options

Hi all

Will be flying from Singapore to Dublin with Singapore Airlines and I have a few layover options.

What I'm after is which is the easiest airport to get through. Choices are Heathrow, Manchester, Amsterdam, CDG and Munich. Heathrow has the shortest layover and the other four are between 3 to 5 hours.

A few people recommended Heathrow but I thought this was a nightmare airport to go through?

Does anyone have a preference or airports to avoid?
Memphis8 is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2016 | 6:35 am
  #2  
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MSY
Programs: BA GfL
Posts: 6,057
I don't find LHR a nightmare, but I am very used to it and also have the option to spend my time in the BA first class lounge, so YMMV. I would avoid CDG, but again, that's me.

Some questions that could help determine which airport would be best:

What is the layover duration for the LHR connection? (In other words, is it so short that you could be in danger of missing your connection if your inbound is delayed?)

Are you traveling in Y, or a higher cabin that will give you lounge access?

What airline(s) would you be taking to get from your European connecting city to DUB?
travelmad478 is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2016 | 9:10 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Greater Seattle Area
Programs: Star Alliance
Posts: 134
Personally not a fan of CDG as well....LHR is alright, but will need some patience depending on your luck. AMS is good, it does the job, and haven't transfer at the other few before.
elexianyx is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2016 | 11:54 pm
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,439
Of those listed, MUC is by far the best. Of course, something can always go wrong!
LondonElite is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 1:34 am
  #5  
cur
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: Blah Airlines Executive Beige, DYKWIA Uranium, TX Propane Commission Blue Flame of Valor
Posts: 7,276
Originally Posted by Memphis8
Hi all

Will be flying from Singapore to Dublin with Singapore Airlines and I have a few layover options.

What I'm after is which is the easiest airport to get through. Choices are Heathrow, Manchester, Amsterdam, CDG and Munich. Heathrow has the shortest layover and the other four are between 3 to 5 hours.

A few people recommended Heathrow but I thought this was a nightmare airport to go through?

Does anyone have a preference or airports to avoid?
those people who suggested lhr are not your friends. i hate that airport with an undying passion. unless your flight from lhr is out t2 (only airline i can think of is aer lingus). also with lhr (assuming you are star gold and or in business class) there are nice lounges, particularly the united and lufthansa lounges. but honestly lhr sucks.

go thru muc or ams. i hear man is ok but honestly i hate dealing with british security and i always get in arguments with them. cdg, while the staff there are decent, is just not a very well built airport. lots of weird narrow hallways, bottlenecks, poorly connected concourses, not that great.]

muc.
cur is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 2:11 am
  #6  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: LAS, ZQN
Programs: UA PP (2MM), BA Silver (Soft landing), AS Titantium
Posts: 2,638
1. MUC
2. AMS
3. CDG
4. LHR (a real pain even when almost efficient it drains you)
no knowledge of MAN
zebranz is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 3:18 am
  #7  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: next to HAM
Programs: LH M+M
Posts: 974
Killing 3-5h in MAN could kill you :-}
PAX_fips is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 3:25 am
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,439
In fairness, a T2/T2 transfer at LHR is not that bad. The nightmare is T3/T5, and anything to do with T4.
LondonElite is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 5:36 am
  #9  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,197
MUC is by far the best airport in that list to connect at.
mmff is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2016 | 5:17 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,857
LHR/AMS/CDG/MUC are all fine. If LHR has the shortest layover then take that one you're going to be doing a T2-T2 transfer.

CDG your doing T1-T1.

AMS and MUC the terminal issue isn't as relevant.
Nugget_Oz is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2016 | 12:35 am
  #11  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 602
1. Muc
2. Ams ~ cdg

...

∞. Lhr
ProleOnParole is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2016 | 9:14 am
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 20
Thanks for the many feedback folks.

- No, I will be flying economy so no lounge access. It's a work trip.
- I checked and the layover at LHR will be at T2, both arrival and departure.
- LHR layover will be between 1.5 to 2 hours, based on the flight choices I'm allowed
- All connecting flights to Dublin from layover will be with Aer Lingus.

Looks like most people prefer AMS or MUC. Although at this point unlikely, if I can swing a stopover, my preference will be AMS since I've never been there before.
Memphis8 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2016 | 10:53 am
  #13  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by Memphis8
- I checked and the layover at LHR will be at T2, both arrival and departure.
- LHR layover will be between 1.5 to 2 hours, based on the flight choices I'm allowed
I prefer MUC over LHR but an all-T2 connection should be relatively painless. Just need to decide if you want the longer SIN-LHR segment plus quick EI hop versus SIN-MUC and then the longer time in Aer Lingus' tighter squeeze.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2016 | 10:58 am
  #14  
Moderator, Amtrak & Spirit Airlines
1M
80 Nights
150 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: DCA :rolleyes:
Programs: AC 50K, AS MVP, AA Plat Pro, DL Plat, UA Silver, IHG Spire, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 11,184
MAN is a hassle. I connected from QR to AA there. Any transfer there requires a bus ride to a security checkpoint and then either another bus to the correct terminal, or if you have a transfer in T2 they hold you after security in a little pen area, and then have to have airport staff escort you through a part of the domestic terminal before you get to a door that drops you in the international part of the airport. I would certainly avoid flying through there with so many other options.
Long Train Runnin is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2016 | 11:20 am
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bregenz, Austria
Programs: AA, BAEC, Alaska, Flying Blue, United, IHG, Hilton
Posts: 2,950
MUC every time. A thoroughly civilised and efficient airport.

2nd choice would be Amsterdam.

CDG and LHR are to be avoided, although T2 at LHR is not as bad as T5.

MAN is not a bad airport, but the flight from SIN goes via MUC anyway.
The_Bouncer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.