Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Stopover flying CPH to BHX?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Stopover flying CPH to BHX?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2016 | 10:40 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 4
Stopover flying CPH to BHX?

Hi,

I'm a frequent traveller between BHX and CPH using SAS and generally it all works fine. However! my trip just before Easter has got interesting as the usual 1745 flight from BHX to CPH on Maundy Thursday doesn't exist - the only flight is at 0830 and as I will be getting to CPH from Sweden it means a very, very early start (perhaps too early).

The system I use for booking flights has helpfully suggested that I could fly with KLM and change at Schiphol or with SAS/KLM changing at Frankfurt with layovers of between 1 hour and 4 hours. Bizarrely they actually work out cheaper than flying with SAS direct but I was wondering if it usual to do such a thing as to change planes on such a short journey.

I'm very tempted to do a stopover at Schiphol as I really liked it there the last time I went 10 years ago- especially the panaormic terrace

So is it usual to change flights when doing a european flight to the UK or am I mad?

Thanks
P
PhillipD is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2016 | 11:27 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Not here; there!
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold
Posts: 35,044
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry: BlackBerry8530/5.0.0.1030 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/417)

"Bizarrely they actually work out cheaper than flying with SAS direct."

Nothing bizarre about that at all. Airlines know that many passengers prefer a nonstop flight to having to connect somewhere. So the airlines that offer nonstops can often charge a premium for those flights, while the airlines that only offer connections on a particular route must offer discounts to attract passengers. In fact, it's possible that CPH-AMS-BHX on KLM will cost less than CPH-AMS by itself!
guv1976 is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2016 | 11:27 am
  #3  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: AGH
Posts: 6,804
Originally Posted by PhillipD
So is it usual to change flights when doing a european flight to the UK or am I mad?
Totally normal. I do a lot of CPH-KRK/WAW/WRO or CPH-VIE and often enough end up connecting though FRA, MUC or ZRH. Most of the times since the direct flight for that day is already fully booked or just has full fare business seats left and I can get e.g. CPH-MUC-WRO for 250€ instead of 1000€ for the direct flight.

Also this is FlyerTalk! Most people enjoy being on planes and airports and also every extra connections awards extra miles! So in the true spirit of Flyertalk try to weave in as much connections as possible but manage to get wherever you need to go in time!

EDIT:// by the way... do not take the SAS/KLM connection trough FRA! That cannot be booked on a single ticket as SAS and KLM do not cooperate or codeshare! It will be two separate tickets and if you miss your connection... well... then you are stuck in FRA. Sounds like a Kayak "hacker fare"... be careful with those. Or is it in fact SAS and LH? Than it would be a good connection.
fassy is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2016 | 11:28 am
  #4  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berlin
Programs: LH FTL
Posts: 548
Stopover flying CPH to BHX?

I've had that plenty of times as my employer thought saving a couple of EUR is cheaper than an additional 2h min. to my travel time....
Milage wise it was nice but that was pretty much the only benefit.
The worst story was flying LEJ-FRA-DUS instead of LEJ-DUS direct (1h)
Today I am happy to have an employer valuing my time much more ;-)
captainiglo is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2016 | 11:30 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA Plat, MM *G for life, AY Plat, BA Silver
Posts: 10,553
From the point of view of FF miles and status, you want to keep it to Star Alliance, therefore stopping over in FRA is far preferable to AMS, despite the much greater distance.
lhrsfo is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2016 | 1:42 pm
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 4
Thanks for the replies! I have to admit I'm quite excited to go to spend a few hours at a different airport and use a different airline! I will be going on the SAS/Lufthansa route via FRA (SAS to FRA then Lufthansa to BHX).

Cheers
P
PhillipD is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2016 | 2:22 pm
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,439
Originally Posted by fassy
EDIT:// by the way... do not take the SAS/KLM connection trough FRA! That cannot be booked on a single ticket as SAS and KLM do not cooperate or codeshare!
Not to be anal about details, but on a Y/YY fare (and possibly lower) you certainly can book this (and pretty much anything on IATA member airlines).
LondonElite is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2016 | 11:25 am
  #8  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Here, unless I'm out.
Programs: BAEC, Flying Blue, Eurostar, Miles&Smiles
Posts: 330
I think it's becoming less common with the rise of point-to-point budget airline travel. Regional airports, with the advantage of being cheaper, now have a wider range of destinations direct.

Having said this I would imagine thousands of people per day are still connecting short haul to short haul. Heck, I connected in LHR doing a simple Brussels to Manchester journey, with both flight times roughly equivalent to that of a gently lobbed frisbee.
maastrichtmouse is offline  
Old Feb 20, 2016 | 11:36 am
  #9  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: AGH
Posts: 6,804
Originally Posted by LondonElite
Not to be anal about details, but on a Y/YY fare (and possibly lower) you certainly can book this (and pretty much anything on IATA member airlines).
Yeah... but that would be most probably so expensive that it would make that routing very unattractive.

Anyway, he corrected to SK/LH which makes sense.
fassy is offline  
Old Feb 21, 2016 | 12:14 am
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bregenz, Austria
Programs: AA, BAEC, Alaska, Flying Blue, United, IHG, Hilton
Posts: 2,950
If you are not worried about the extra time spent, there is nothing wrong with it. In the days of free connections on BAEC RFS flights, I often did MAN-LHR-ZRH/MUC. These days I often use SK and connect in CPH. It's usually cheaper than direct flights. Another route I like is BHX-ZRH-MUC on LX. Often cheaper than BHX-ZRH.
The_Bouncer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.