Refusing to gate-check bag
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: May 2001
Location: MSY; 2-time FT Fantasy Football Champ, now in recovery.
Programs: AA lifetime GLD; UA Silver; Marriott LTTE; IHG Plat,
Posts: 14,813
I'll agree with others here that there's no guarantee that there will be room for your carry-on. But since there were later flights that day available, and OP was willing to be moved to one, that's the reasonable and logical solution.
(That's not very game-able, few passengers would want to schlep out to the airport, wait for boarding, for the "benefit" of a free rebooking to a flight a few hours later. )
I wonder what would have happened if you explained that your carry-on was full of spare lithium batteries?
(That's not very game-able, few passengers would want to schlep out to the airport, wait for boarding, for the "benefit" of a free rebooking to a flight a few hours later. )
I wonder what would have happened if you explained that your carry-on was full of spare lithium batteries?
#17
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: Aeroplan, IHG, Enterprise, Avios, Nexus
Posts: 8,355
They can't force you to check your bag. They can however determine where your bag will be placed. It was your decision not to board the plane therefore you are a no show in their eyes and will be treated accordingly.
#18
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,253
The "solution" to this is to agree to gate-check the bag, but to request your right to declare "excess valuation" of the contents to increase the level of carrier liability (and to pay the relevant fees mandated in the Contract of Carriage for the excess valuation). The airline is obliged to permit you to do this at the point of luggage check-in.
In every single case I've requested to do this, the agents back off pretty much immediately. It's easier to let you carry the bag on board than to deal with the paperwork for the excess valuation, which would almost certainly either delay the flight or wind up with the flight departing without you.
Note that this only works if you are within your baggage allowance and passage is being denied purely because of "space on board" and not due to non-compliance on your part. If your bag is too large or too heavy, I would not suggest you try this.
In every single case I've requested to do this, the agents back off pretty much immediately. It's easier to let you carry the bag on board than to deal with the paperwork for the excess valuation, which would almost certainly either delay the flight or wind up with the flight departing without you.
Note that this only works if you are within your baggage allowance and passage is being denied purely because of "space on board" and not due to non-compliance on your part. If your bag is too large or too heavy, I would not suggest you try this.
Might be helpful on international, but not that most carriers would require that the declaration be made by the baggage cutoff and that would likely have passed.
Bear in mind that nobody can force you to fly. But, that doesn't mean that your ticket retains value if you choose not to.
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,809
Nobody has an automatic right to bin / carry-on space. If the aircraft had been a CRJ200 this would not even be a discussion point... there's no room inside for a rollaboard. OP should have planned accordingly.
#20
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,684
#22
Original Poster
Moderator: Manufactured Spending



Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,707
Thanks for all the answers. Since a few people have asked, this was UA SFO-LAX on a 737.
What bothers me is that the FA told me to just go out and ask to get put on the next flight, as if this was a common occurrence. When I went out, the GA seemed busy and didn't want to deal with me, so she passed me on to someone else.
Here is the airline's carry-on baggage page: https://www.united.com/CMS/en-US/tra...eCarry-On.aspx It clearly says that "each traveler can bring on board one carry-on bag plus one personal item free of charge". There are no asterisks or disclaimers anywhere about room not being available. Perhaps it's in the fine print somewhere else.
I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that airlines will provide the service they advertise. Of course sometimes it's just not possible, but in those cases they should work with you to provide another alternative rather than saying sorry, you're out of luck.
What bothers me is that the FA told me to just go out and ask to get put on the next flight, as if this was a common occurrence. When I went out, the GA seemed busy and didn't want to deal with me, so she passed me on to someone else.
Here is the airline's carry-on baggage page: https://www.united.com/CMS/en-US/tra...eCarry-On.aspx It clearly says that "each traveler can bring on board one carry-on bag plus one personal item free of charge". There are no asterisks or disclaimers anywhere about room not being available. Perhaps it's in the fine print somewhere else.
I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that airlines will provide the service they advertise. Of course sometimes it's just not possible, but in those cases they should work with you to provide another alternative rather than saying sorry, you're out of luck.
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: QLA
Programs: SBUX Gold
Posts: 14,508
#24
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The lower of the two Carolinas
Programs: Former AA Gold, SkyMiles, Hilton HHonors, SPG Gold, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 387
It clearly says that "each traveler can bring on board one carry-on bag plus one personal item free of charge". There are no asterisks or disclaimers anywhere about room not being available. Perhaps it's in the fine print somewhere else.
I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that airlines will provide the service they advertise. Of course sometimes it's just not possible, but in those cases they should work with you to provide another alternative rather than saying sorry, you're out of luck.
I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that airlines will provide the service they advertise. Of course sometimes it's just not possible, but in those cases they should work with you to provide another alternative rather than saying sorry, you're out of luck.
I've reached the point I just pay for priority these days because I don't want to deal with it anymore. Even on official travel, if I'm not in uniform or I know the airline doesn't let military in uniform board first (or I'm not flying in uniform), I pony up for Economy Plus out of pocket. It's worth it to me, especially if the uniform I need for the next day/first day of whatever I'm going to is IN my carry-on. So I suppose I'm paying to carry on a bag, really...
#26
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atherton, CA
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP; Owner, Green Bay Packers
Posts: 21,685
OP, if you don't have status on an airline, you should make sure to be first in line for whatever boarding group you are in.
I've heard of the demand for excess valuation insurance being used as a counterattack for this by others on FT. Might be worth a try next time.
I've heard of the demand for excess valuation insurance being used as a counterattack for this by others on FT. Might be worth a try next time.
#27


Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,430
The whole reason I even have a carry-on when I fly is for those items that are too valuable and fragile to be checked. In my case, that's mostly computer and camera gear.
Having seen a few instances of people being forced to gate-check their bags, I am now paranoid about it and go to great lengths to make sure I board early enough to secure overhead space. If I'm ever delayed or hit with some other circumstance that forces me into gate-checking, I think I'd probably do exactly what OP did and eat whatever charges are necessary.
Of course, if that happened, I'd also complain incessantly to the carrier until they refunded any extra charges I had to accrue.
Having seen a few instances of people being forced to gate-check their bags, I am now paranoid about it and go to great lengths to make sure I board early enough to secure overhead space. If I'm ever delayed or hit with some other circumstance that forces me into gate-checking, I think I'd probably do exactly what OP did and eat whatever charges are necessary.
Of course, if that happened, I'd also complain incessantly to the carrier until they refunded any extra charges I had to accrue.
#28
Moderator, Hilton Honors



Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,445
#29
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,253
In which case, the "bag-in-bag" scheme is a necessity. Dump the valuables into the small bag, carry that on and gate check the larger one. Unless you've just looted some museum, that ought to work.
#30


Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Nashua, NH USA
Programs: Seashore Trolley Museum "flight attendant"
Posts: 2,015
Now, most airlines' baggage rules say that certain things should not be put in checked baggage. Specifically mentioned are medicines, valuable, and keys.
Also try calling the airline in advance to see what they suggest when it comes to valuable items being transported.
Also try calling the airline in advance to see what they suggest when it comes to valuable items being transported.
Last edited by AllanJ; Sep 13, 2015 at 7:59 pm

