Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Do you refuse to drive, and fly instead?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Do you refuse to drive, and fly instead?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2015 | 5:11 pm
  #46  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: AA Platinum, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 288
I regularly fly from Chicago to St. Louis even though the drive only takes me a little over 4 hours.

There are only a few things more boring than driving through the entire state of Illinois.
Dsm2m2 is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2015 | 11:18 am
  #47  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Programs: AC E50K (*G), Westjet Gold
Posts: 788
Anything over 150 miles (240km), I'll fly, so my 250km YEG-YYC flights are always flown. Its usually same day return trips, so thats 5 hours in a car, which can be alot, especially in the winter on a busy highway.

That being said, I will drive if i absolutely have to. For example, last march I had a very important meeting in YYC but could not for the life of me get a return flight because of spring break. I ended up driving that day, so it happens, albeit rarely.

The other exceptions to this rule are mountain resort towns where there is no real air service (Banff, Jasper), and YQR-YXE, which is only served 5 or 6 times daily by expressair at about $400 round trip. Its an easy drive, and because the number of flights is so limited, its not worth it to wait around in the afternoon if I am done early.

I also know YEG-YMM (Fort McMurray) is interesting and that a lot of people who would usually drive that distance (400km) end up flying because the highway is notoriously dangerous and stressful to drive.
nave888 is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2015 | 12:28 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 164
As others have said, the nature of the drive plays into it.
Out west here, as soon as you leave a metro area, it's 80mph drive on wide open road. I don't mind that at all. Driving over the mountains is beautiful.

However, in winter I always fly. You never know what conditions will be like several days or weeks ahead.
Heck, you don't know what the conditions for return in a few days. The roads may not even be open.
pilotalan is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2015 | 3:28 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: DFW
Programs: IHG Plat, AA GLD, DL FO, Natl Elite
Posts: 259
Originally Posted by Dsm2m2
I regularly fly from Chicago to St. Louis even though the drive only takes me a little over 4 hours.

There are only a few things more boring than driving through the entire state of Illinois.
I've heard enough horror stories about driving from DFW to OKC to rule that one out, the worst being that after 4 hours of driving, you end up in Oklahoma. I'll take the flight.
BigOrangeTerp is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2015 | 8:34 pm
  #50  
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ASIA
Programs: TK Elite, ALL Plus Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,536
From SIN-KUL (40min flight) it's always a toss up for me.
I typically fly for work, I have somebidy pick me up from the airport; but I drive when with family.

Catching a cab when the tropical thunderstorms hit in Kuala Lumpur is no fun.

The biggest problem we have here is crossing the border from Singapore to Malaysia.
Off-peak it can take 10 minutes.
Peak times, school holidays etc can take up to 3 or 4 hours.
The drive itself on a 2 lane highway can also be eventful when there's an accident. So a drive of 350km, which on good days I can cover in 2 1/2 hours (breaking the speed limit), can take up to 5 hours if I'm unlucky.

So in a really unlucky scenario, 350km end up taking 9 hours.
gilbertaue is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2015 | 6:07 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SYD
Programs: QF
Posts: 490
If it's greater than a 6-7 hour-ish (600-700km) drive I'll consider flying.
CitizenWorld is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2015 | 6:49 am
  #52  
20 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SJC/SFO
Programs: WN A+ CP, UA 1MM/*A Gold, Mar LT Tit, IHG Plat, HH Dia
Posts: 6,377
4.5 hours is my rule of thumb for driving versus flying. If flying required a connection I'd increase that by at least an hour. But either way it's not as simple as just looking at the times. I also consider:

- How expensive are the flights vs. the cost of operating my own car or renting one?
- Do I need a car at my destination?
- Does the flight schedule align well with my personal schedule?
- How important is having flexibility in my return date/time?
- Would driving require me to drive at undesirable times of the day, e.g. during frustrating commute times or at the end of a tiring day?
darthbimmer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.