Community
Wiki Posts
Search

767's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2014 | 6:56 am
  #31  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 6
Smile

Thanks again for answering my questions, everyone. I have enjoyed reading all the comments and am now totally de-stressed (instead of distressed) about this flight. I got a chuckle from 84fiero's Lindbergh photo and am comforted that there is someone who actually has the username ILUV767. I'm still bummed that my eastbound flight is on AA and not BA, especially since I got burned on the airfare from booking so late, but I guess in the big picture it's all good.
travelsmitty is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2014 | 7:31 am
  #32  
Formerly known as tireman77
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 7,817
Originally Posted by LAXative
THIS (A318) is "a lot smaller..."



Both of these planes make it across the Atlantic just fine.
Actually, the one on the right often has to make a technical stop at SNN when going westbound.

For the OP, the 767 is MUCH bigger than the one on the right...

Great pic, though. Thanks for sharing!
PLeblond is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2014 | 8:58 am
  #33  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,439
767's

The BA001 and 003 flights LCY-JFK ALWAYS stop in SNN as the runway at LCY is too short for takeoff with a full tank. This has the added benefit of US preclearance there so arrival at JFK is at a domestic gate.
LondonElite is offline  
Old Jul 16, 2014 | 8:45 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: IAD
Posts: 319
I had also though that the LCY->JFK flight made the technical/preclearance stop at SNN for fuel loading limits, but I also remember reading somewhere that there was another issue. LCY isn't a base for BA mainline, so the pilots actually report to work at LHR or LGW due to union rules and are shuttled to LCY, so they being their duty day too early to fly all the way to JFK.

Can anyone who's been on this flight confirm that there is a crew cockpit crew change at SNN?
fpc552 is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2014 | 7:50 am
  #35  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Programs: American Airlines
Posts: 31,464
Originally Posted by SEA-Flyer
The 767 is an older plane than the 777. But it has an excellent safety record.

Prior to the 767, most aircraft that flew transatlantic were four engined. The 767 revolutionized long range twin engine operation, paving the way for later aircraft such as the A330, 777, 787. The 767-300ER has enough range to do west coast of the US to Europe, so flying it across the Atlantic isn't an issue.

Obviously, things vary based on how airlines decide on how to outfit the cabin, but I think that generally 767 is the comfiest airplane in economy class, which is a 2-3-2 seat arrangement - 85% of the seats are either aisle or window.
Didn't the A300 do this first or am I mistaken?
enviroian is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2014 | 8:11 am
  #36  
Formerly known as tireman77
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 7,817
Originally Posted by enviroian
Didn't the A300 do this first or am I mistaken?
The A300 was the first twin engined wide body. I believe the 767 was the first plane to be ETOPS certified.

Not sure to which the previous poster was referring to.
PLeblond is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2014 | 8:23 am
  #37  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Programs: Aadvantage Gold
Posts: 553
Originally Posted by tireman77
Actually, the one on the right often has to make a technical stop at SNN when going westbound.

For the OP, the 767 is MUCH bigger than the one on the right...

Great pic, though. Thanks for sharing!
The stop in SNN is because the runway at LCY is too short to fully load the aircraft with fuel.

It's not really a technical stop.
Cassie55 is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2014 | 8:52 am
  #38  
Formerly known as tireman77
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 7,817
Originally Posted by Cassie55
The stop in SNN is because the runway at LCY is too short to fully load the aircraft with fuel.

It's not really a technical stop.
It needs to stop to take on fuel to complete the flight to its destination without the loading or offloading of passengers. Isn't that by definition, a technical stop?

(I know the passengers get off, go through pre-clearance then get back on, but I believe passengers do not get off an SNN or board at SNN, so the do not load of offload passengers)
PLeblond is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2014 | 8:38 pm
  #39  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by bhomburg
American's 767-300s have been crossing the Atlantic for about 25 years now without one single accident so far.
And my immediate thought was, "And in the case of AA also without one single refurb or change of cabin crew, as well as the same meals and crappy 1980's IFE."


Why do I always get the broken seat and IFE tablet on AA 767's?! Mind you, it's a consistent earner on points compensation as a result. I think I'm averaging ~10k points on each flight in compensation for something that isn't working on the sodding things. :-/

Last edited by SeriouslyLost; Jul 17, 2014 at 8:47 pm
SeriouslyLost is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2014 | 2:27 am
  #40  
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: SEA once more (previously CDG and NRT)
Programs: Former DL DM and UA 1k, now a J class free agent (UA Plat, DL Plat, AS MVP Gold, Marriott Titanum)
Posts: 2,458
Originally Posted by enviroian
Didn't the A300 do this first or am I mistaken?
Originally Posted by tireman77
The A300 was the first twin engined wide body. I believe the 767 was the first plane to be ETOPS certified.

Not sure to which the previous poster was referring to.
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that the 767 was the first twin engine wide bodied plane. You are correct that the A300 was first.

The A300 was the first ETOPS aircraft, but it was only certified for either 60 or 90 minutes(I can't remember which), which isn't useful. The A300 was never a significant trans-atlantic aircraft, but did become popular within Asia.

The 767 was first to be certified for 120mins ETOPS, which is what is necessary for viable trans-atlantic service. Later, 120+15% (138) was added to help handle the situation where diversion airports were closed due to weather.

A map of 60, 90, 120, and 138 minute ETOPS
SEA-Flyer is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2014 | 4:52 pm
  #41  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 6
Just to follow up from my original post: I completed my trip across the pond to Ireland on a 763 and back on a 747, safely and with no anxiety! Thanks again for everyone's reassurance!
travelsmitty is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2014 | 4:54 pm
  #42  
Formerly known as tireman77
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 7,817
Originally Posted by travelsmitty
Just to follow up from my original post: I completed my trip across the pond to Ireland on a 763 and back on a 747, safely and with no anxiety! Thanks again for everyone's reassurance!
Glad to hear it! Flying is fun!!!!
PLeblond is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2014 | 5:28 pm
  #43  
HMO
100k
20 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 963
It seems I'm a little late, but this picture shows the sizes of some cargo aircrafts. The commercial versions have the same length. You can the 767 has a decent size:

HMO is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2014 | 1:39 am
  #44  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: LHR
Programs: DL DM 2MM, BA Bronze, Various Hotels
Posts: 10,188
Originally Posted by travelsmitty
Just to follow up from my original post: I completed my trip across the pond to Ireland on a 763 and back on a 747, safely and with no anxiety! Thanks again for everyone's reassurance!
Glad you had a good trip!
rwoman is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2014 | 11:17 am
  #45  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
2M
Community Builder
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA the REAL Washington; occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: AS MVPG 100K (Atmos Titanium) / 0.5MM; DL fallen PM (1.58MM = Complimentary Annual GM); AA Gold
Posts: 24,476
Originally Posted by Flinders
I hadn't seen this photo before, but I love it!
Originally Posted by LAXative
THIS (A318) is "a lot smaller..."

...
...

back in 1982 or thereabouts, several of my co-workers started a caption contest for a similar photo that appeared on the cover of the internal Boeing phone book; it was a nose-on shot of a 747 and 737, facing in the same direction

the two winners were "Not tonight, dear, I have a headache" and "Daddy, when I grow up can I have four engines too?"
jrl767 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.