Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Was Flying Ever Different?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Was Flying Ever Different?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2013 | 5:16 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Programs: Alcoholics Anonymous - Platinum, Gamblers Anonymous - Gold
Posts: 212
Originally Posted by Tall Travel Dude
My dad worked for Delta (well, it was Western Airlines when he started) for 35 years. My family, of course, flew non-rev, and as was the case back in those pre-deregulation, pre-frequent flyer miles era, we often got to sit in First Class. I remember that even as a 10 year old, I had to wear kid slacks and a kid sports jacket. In fact, when a friend from jr. high told me he was flying in First (revenue), I warned him that he had to wear a jacket and tie or he wouldn't be let on! I simply didn't know any better.
Haha. As far as I'm concerned, sitting in the premium cabin is still one of those "when in Rome" things. Gotta at least look the part
JBHighRoller is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2013 | 6:36 am
  #17  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: FSD
Programs: BAEC, Delta SkyPesos, VS FC, SQ KF, AA, HHonors
Posts: 1,884
Originally Posted by JBHighRoller
Haha. As far as I'm concerned, sitting in the premium cabin is still one of those "when in Rome" things. Gotta at least look the part
For whose benefit?

Many FA's make under 20k per annum. They're not regular customers at Herms. Their non-rev family members probably aren't paragons of fashion, either. They're looking to do their jobs with a minimum of annoyances.

The white collar professional who paid with Amex points? He's on holiday and desires ease & comfort. Many of these chaps are escaping their neck-ties, not cracking out a new one.

The self-important businessman? He's too busy pretending to rule the world on the company dime in a Joseph A Bank suit.

The FT'er waxing poetic on bygone elegance? They're living in the past. If you experienced flying back in the day as slawecki did, such grandiose memories must seem like an imagined past.
Amelorn is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2013 | 11:27 am
  #18  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NAP
Programs: LH, BA, TK
Posts: 2,410
Originally Posted by fleef
I am all for raising ticket prices.
No thanks!

Originally Posted by fleef
Why not? That way airlines can afford to put one seat in the place where they now have crammed two, or three.
Already have first class cabin.
It takes you enough away from our stink.
Forrest Bump is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2013 | 4:52 pm
  #19  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Programs: United MileagePlus Silver, Nexus, Global Entry
Posts: 8,810
Originally Posted by fleef
I am all for raising ticket prices. Why not?
Why?

If you want to pay more, fly in business class. In some cases, indexed to inflation, business class is cheaper than economy was in the good ol' days.

You can clink to your heart's content.
gglave is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2013 | 6:39 pm
  #20  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: dallas texas usa
Programs: aa plt 4.9MM LTAC
Posts: 14,828
in 1967, we had a project w/united....every sun i did iad-sfo & fri came back....the plane was a stretch dc8, comfortable in back for 6'3", 215 lb guy....

ua would give you a lounge card if you documented flying 100k mi....

circa 1976/7, my boss & i were were at braniff gate at dfw waiting for a delayed flight.....harding lawrence, braniff chairman was also waiting....boss knew him, so we chatted a bit & and he set up both of us w/lounge cards...
clacko is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2013 | 6:45 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 179
Originally Posted by Gamecock
The downward spiral cannot be blamed on the aielines alone. Look at those sitting around you who demand rock bottom prices.
I agree with this, but, would also note that this is simply what people demand.

Delta/AA/UA/ETC could easily take a plane, remove 20% of the seats, and charge 25% more for each seat...but, this would be a failing concept, and they know it.

Travelers are either very price sensitive, or very un-price sensitive...
ChurnBabyChurn is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2013 | 9:33 pm
  #22  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: トロント
Programs: IHG Platinum
Posts: 4,856
Originally Posted by jonsintown
Adding to all this I think the worldwide smoking ban was not a good thing for air travel. Agree or disagree with me but for a smoker that tobacco fix is like a class A addiction and for that person to be deprived of his or her fix for anything up to 15 hours is not pleasant. It's one thing banning all smoking on flights, but for most airports now to even close special smoking areas is in my opinion asking for trouble. At least allow a nervous flyer smoker one cigarette.

Well, since you asked us to agree or disagree, I will disagree. That's one thing about the old days I certainly don't miss--sitting a few rows away from a bunch of smoke puffers. Ugh, I can't imagine why we put up with it ever.
mapleg is offline  
Old Jun 2, 2013 | 12:29 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LHR / IAD
Programs: BA/AA/UA
Posts: 2,955
We've had a few dozen threads on this topic FWIW

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...years-ago.html
China Clipper is offline  
Old Jun 2, 2013 | 12:30 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LHR / IAD
Programs: BA/AA/UA
Posts: 2,955
Originally Posted by Amelorn
For whose benefit?

Many FA's make under 20k per annum. They're not regular customers at Herms. Their non-rev family members probably aren't paragons of fashion, either. They're looking to do their jobs with a minimum of annoyances.

The white collar professional who paid with Amex points? He's on holiday and desires ease & comfort. Many of these chaps are escaping their neck-ties, not cracking out a new one.

The self-important businessman? He's too busy pretending to rule the world on the company dime in a Joseph A Bank suit.

The FT'er waxing poetic on bygone elegance? They're living in the past. If you experienced flying back in the day as slawecki did, such grandiose memories must seem like an imagined past.
Good God you're cynical! Not that there's anything wrong with that
China Clipper is offline  
Old Jun 2, 2013 | 9:35 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Nights
500k
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 21,268
Originally Posted by jonsintown
So just because the UK Easyjet or the US Southwest Airlines for example, decides to incur yet another fee for this and another charge and another add on fee for that, it seems then that it is quite all right for any World 3 or 4 star rated airline to follow suit.
In point of fact, Southwest charges LESS fees for things like changing tickets and checking luggage than other carriers.

What they don't do... is sell a first class cabin. All coach.
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Jun 2, 2013 | 9:50 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: HGP/SPG: Apprentice Kettle; UA/AA/DL: Journeyman Kettle
Posts: 866
Originally Posted by Gamecock
Yes, it was different.

I started flying TATLs at 2, back in 1962.

The downward spiral cannot be blamed on the aielines alone. Look at those sitting around you who demand rock bottom prices.
You mean the business travelers whose companies demand that they fly lowest fare?? Oh, with the exception of the C*O/Executive flyers, of course.


Originally Posted by croberts134
Unfortunately this is no longer an apt analogy. There are infinitely more restaurants than airlines so you have far more options. Both restaurants and airlines know this and respond accordingly. Add the pressure for low fares and the inevitable "fare wars" that occur, it's no surprise that air travel is a commodity now.

I think a McDonald's is a better analogy for air travel these days:

You order a Double Quarter Pounder and receive a regular Quarter Pounder. Then:

a) The cashier stares at you blankly (at best) or is annoyed that you've reappeared (more normal)
b) They add the additional patty or replace the sandwich altogether while pouting or sighing heavily
c) You get nothing else except more calories than you need
I think the difference is between the classes, especially if you fly on a non-US based airline.

Most 'fine' dining restaurants have very large margins on the charge for the food. So fine dining is more akin to paying the full un-discounted CASH price for a seat/suite in First class. In almost all cases that I know of personally the airline treats such customers well. And the level of customer service goes down from there. Just as it does as you move down the dining experience chain.

Last edited by MIT_SBM; Jun 2, 2013 at 10:00 pm
MIT_SBM is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.