Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Yes, yet another hidden city question

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Yes, yet another hidden city question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2012, 5:20 pm
  #46  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 438
Originally Posted by cbn42
Believe me, LeeAnne, I am laughing at you just as much as you are laughing at me, if not more.
Yeah but you've got FANS now! Anyway, glad I could contribute to your day in some positive way.

When you go to the US Airways counter in PHX and tell them that your mom will not be proceeding onto the flight at LAX (as you stated you would do), please discretely record the conversation and post it on here. We would love to hear it.
Actually I didn't say that. Here's what I said:

If I need to say anything, I will say that she did not feel up to the flight, and chose not to continue to LA.
I also said:

If she decides to go home once we get to Phoenix, I'll probably go ahead and tell the gate agent that she won't be boarding, since she will have already been issued a boarding pass and I don't want them to be paging her.
There's a difference between saying I WILL do it, and saying I "probably" will do it. So don't put words in my mouth...that irritates me. I have made my intentions clear: I will tell them she is not continuing, if I need to...if they are looking for her, or paging her. But I expect they won't give a squat. And all of the posts I've read about this, here and elsewhere, have confirmed this. People miss flights all the time. Why should they care about this one little old lady missing hers?

And if I'm not mistaken, recording conversations without the other's knowledge is a crime in AZ. Sorry but I have no intention of committing a crime just for your edification. Remember, I'm the person who doesn't even LIE!
LeeAnne is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2012, 5:27 pm
  #47  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 438
Originally Posted by cbn42
When you go to the US Airways counter in PHX and tell them that your mom will not be proceeding onto the flight at LAX (as you stated you would do), please discretely record the conversation and post it on here. We would love to hear it.
However, I will do this for you, because I'm such a giver...I will provide you with a preview transcript of the conversation:

Me: Hi, I heard you paging for passenger Jones
Gate Agent: Yes, passenger Jones is ticketed on this flight, but hasn't checked in
Me: My mother will not be joining me on the flight to LAX
Gate Agent: Your mother will not be joining you on the flight to LAX
Me: She is not the old lady you are looking for
Gate Agent: She is not the old lady we are looking for
Me: Move along now
Gate Agent: Move along now

LeeAnne is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2012, 5:38 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: STL
Programs: WN, DL, AA; Hyatt or Wyndham
Posts: 1,079
Originally Posted by cbn42
Believe me, LeeAnne, I am laughing at you just as much as you are laughing at me, if not more.

When you go to the US Airways counter in PHX and tell them that your mom will not be proceeding onto the flight at LAX (as you stated you would do), please discretely record the conversation and post it on here. We would love to hear it.
So you're saying an airplane employee might object to a reasonable, logical approach to air travel? Color me shocked.

Getting an earful from an airline employee for one's actions, would not make one's actions unethical.
Delta Hog is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2012, 5:49 pm
  #49  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 438
By the way, a note to all of my friends...I'm up to THREE! That's three movie references in this thread.

One: The Godfather
Originally Posted by LeeAnne
Isn't that what Tom Hagen says to Tessio right before they are going to ice him?
Two: Wizard of Oz
Originally Posted by LeeAnne
"Pay no attention to the price tag around the corner."
Three: Star Wars
Originally Posted by LeeAnne
Me: These are not the droids you're looking for.
TSA: These are not the droids I'm looking for.
Me: This is not milk.
TSA: This is not milk.
Me: We can go about our business.
TSA: You can go about your business.
Me: Move along now.
TSA: Move along now.

We'll see if I can squeeze any more in...if things continue as they are, I should be able to get in a at least a couple more.

Last edited by LeeAnne; Oct 2, 2012 at 5:56 pm
LeeAnne is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2012, 5:54 pm
  #50  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 438
Originally Posted by Delta Hog
So you're saying an airplane employee might object to a reasonable, logical approach to air travel? Color me shocked.

Getting an earful from an airline employee for one's actions, would not make one's actions unethical.
Tell me about it! I watched a young man get thrown off a plane once because an airline employee didn't like his perfectly reasonable behavior.

I was booked on a connecting flight from Vegas to JFK, traveling with my two young children. We boarded, sat for an hour, were off-boarded with no explanation, sat for a while, were onboarded again, then offboarded...this went on for something like 4 hours. The gate agents were exceedingly rude, giving us no information...at one point the gate agents were telling us to board, the FAs were telling us to get off, and we poor passengers were bumping into each other like lemmings in the jetway.

During this confusion a young man apparently got frustrated and mouthed "W T F is going on around here?" (the whole words) to his girlfriend while standing in the line. I didn't hear it, even though I was near him - he must have said it pretty softly! But apparently the gate agent saw this. We finally did get seated, and the plane fired up and was ready to back away from the gate, when suddenly we heard the engines power down. We all groaned, and then the door opened and POLICE came marching in! The gate agent led them to the poor young man, who was seated two rows behind me, and demanded that he be ejected from the flight.

I thought this was excessive and unfair, so I stood up and tried to reason with the cops, telling them that he had not done anything wrong. The GA LUNGED at me and screamed, LOUDLY, "I will not have anyone saying "F###! on my plane! And if you don't sit down and shut up, I'll have YOU arrested!" The poor young man pleaded with the FA and the cops, but no dice - off he went. I couldn't believe it, but I kept my mouth shut because the last thing I needed was to find myself cooling my heels in a jail cell in Vegas while my two small children were sent to child protective services!

What irritated me the most was that my children never heard "that word" from the young man...but they sure heard it from that irate GA!

I always felt bad for that poor guy and wished I'd had the nerve to stand up for him better.

Editing to add: Fortunately, what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas! (That's for you, Dana...and that's FOUR!)

Last edited by LeeAnne; Oct 2, 2012 at 6:57 pm
LeeAnne is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2012, 11:06 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: CAK
Posts: 31
Originally Posted by LeeAnne
Tell me about it! I watched a young man get thrown off a plane once because an airline employee didn't like his perfectly reasonable behavior.


I always felt bad for that poor guy and wished I'd had the nerve to stand up for him better.

Editing to add: Fortunately, what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas! (That's for you, Dana...and that's FOUR!)
Assume you did send in a full report to the Airline and told everyone you possibly could about it.

Of course, nowadays, it would be Facebook and Twitter time.
FMDXR is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2012, 8:18 am
  #52  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,573
Originally Posted by LeeAnne
LOL don't worry, they don't bother me. I knew they'd come out of the woodwork - they are completely predictable. I found it all entertaining. I don't feel the slightest hesitation about the ethics of using whatever portion of the ticket I legally purchased that I want to use, and discarding what I don't. Even the suggestion that there is anything wrong with this is patently absurd. The airlines can throw whatever bizarre verbiage in their contracts they want, but they cannot compel me to go somewhere I don't want to go, or charge me for NOT going there.

I can't help but laugh at the people who get all indignant over this. The fact that I found a way to potentially pay less for a flight by not using all of it means only that I am a smart shopper. Paying a lower rate for something by buying more than you intend to use is a common consumer tactic in a free market where pricing is often not tied to the quantity of a commodity or service you buy, but how/where/when you buy it. And that's all I'm doing.

As for what we'll end up doing, we still haven't decided if she's going to come back with me to LA at the end of the trip or not. We may not make that decision until she sees how she's feeling. She knows we'd love to have her, but if she's worn out after our vacation, she may just want to go straight home. I'll leave it up to her. And I will only say something if I find it necessary - if, for example, I hear them paging her.
Re: the bolded part - whilst the airline cannot make you take a flight, they absolutely can charge you more for not doing so. Whether they do or not is another matter, but they could quite legitimately charge your credit card for the flight taken (after the fact).

It's not the only example of having to take more to ensure the cost remains the same. Take clearance sales. Someone has a container they want emptying, the buyer agrees to pay $100, not for the one mirror he thinks is worth that amount, but for emptying the entire unit - he can't just take the mirror and say 'you can't make me take more stuff', because the contract says they can (either by voiding the entire deal, no mirror, if they got wind before the action, or applying additional charges afterwards).

It's also common with auctions - the term 'job lot' - you take it all for the price agreed, whether you want all of it or not. You attempt to leave the thin, dying cow behind at the livestock auction after purchasing a job lot, and the auctioneers will charge your for its disposal.
emma69 is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2012, 10:31 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 595
The high-horse approach that several of the posters are taking here is puzzling. A big part of frequent flying, especially the type usually featured on FT, is using loopholes in airline programs in order to get better deals/upgrades/award tickets/etc. How hidden-city is less 'ethical' than buying obvious mistake fares (just an example) is beyond me.

The original posts were about any potential issues that might pop up when pulling a hidden city, not the complete and utter lack of morality and ethics that the OP must have to even consider lying to the airlines like this

So let's just stick to the facts, I'm sure the OP is a big girl and can make her own decisions according to her own moral code.
Originally Posted by cbn42
...
When you go to the US Airways counter in PHX and tell them that your mom will not be proceeding onto the flight at LAX (as you stated you would do), please discretely record the conversation and post it on here. We would love to hear it.
Sorry, pet peeve
orthar is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2012, 10:44 am
  #54  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 438
Originally Posted by emma69
Re: the bolded part - whilst the airline cannot make you take a flight, they absolutely can charge you more for not doing so. Whether they do or not is another matter, but they could quite legitimately charge your credit card for the flight taken (after the fact).

It's not the only example of having to take more to ensure the cost remains the same. Take clearance sales. Someone has a container they want emptying, the buyer agrees to pay $100, not for the one mirror he thinks is worth that amount, but for emptying the entire unit - he can't just take the mirror and say 'you can't make me take more stuff', because the contract says they can (either by voiding the entire deal, no mirror, if they got wind before the action, or applying additional charges afterwards).

It's also common with auctions - the term 'job lot' - you take it all for the price agreed, whether you want all of it or not. You attempt to leave the thin, dying cow behind at the livestock auction after purchasing a job lot, and the auctioneers will charge your for its disposal.
LOL! More analogies. Love 'em. Okay, here's where your particular analogies break down:

1. I already took the container home at the clearance sale. They can't MAKE me wear that horrible purple jumpsuit! I threw it in the trash. And there's nothing they can do about it.

2. I already left with the sickly cow and brought her back to my farm. No way was I going to drink her skeevy milk or eat her crappy steaks! I euthanized her and buried her in the woods. They can't now charge my credit card for a higher price.

But thanks for the exercise! Good try. Got any more?

Just FTR, I did some research last night, and I learned a few things:

1. Millions of people have done "hidden city" ticketing. Happens all the time. Some do it practically WEEKLY! The airlines don't like it, but there's not much they can do about it. And nobody, not one person, can report a single instance of an airline trying to charge them the higher price after-the-fact. Not one. Just like the TSA can't show us a single terrorist caught by their absurd molestations. Not one.

2. My brother is a lawyer, and I asked him about this last night. Here's what he told me: Hidden city ticketing is NOT illegal. No laws are being broken. The only legal aspect that might come into play is contractual law, but breaking the provisions of a contract is NOT illegal. The only recourse is a lawsuit in CIVIL court. So, if an airline wanted to get more money out of me, they'd have to sue me. And if they did, this particular clause in the contract is so one-sided and onerous that they would lose.

Here's a bit of contract law trivia: Contracts are not "laws". They are agreements between two people or entities that can involve the legal system to enforce them. But the reality is that anyone can put anything they want in a contract, and even if I sign it, if the contract doesn't meet some basic standards of fairness, it can be voided. Happens all the time. Think about pre-nups: how many socialites have taken their rich husbands to court to get out of their pre-nups when the marriage fails? Hey, she signed it, she agreed to it when she married the bum...but now she wants more of his money than the contract allows. Well, yeah...if a judge rules that a provision of the contract was unreasonable, BOOM - out it goes. But this has to GO TO COURT. That's the part that's not gonna happen. Can you imagine US Air taking my elderly, disabled, cancer-survivor, war-veteran-widow mother to court and telling a judge that they want her to pay more money because she...<GASP>...didn't take a flight in order to save some money? ROFL! They'd be laughed out of court.

3. Should the airline attempt to charge my credit card the fare difference (and again, there are no reports of this EVER HAPPENING), all I would have to do is dispute it on my credit card. I would win, because I paid for the portion of the ticket that I used. The airlines may WANT me to fly the whole route, and may WISH I'd paid the higher price for the ticket, but I bought it legally, and was ticketed for the legs I flew. The fact that I managed to get my ticket for a lower price is nothing but smart consumerism.

4. The only real risk of doing a hidden city ticket is if you are a frequent flyer and get caught, they could take your FF miles away (There are scattered reports that this has been threatened, and 2nd-hand reports that it's been done, but no actual first-hand reports of it ever happening to someone). Travel agents do have more to worry about - if they issue hidden city tickets on a regular basis, they could be hit with a debit memo from the airline.

So in the end, we have all you people all up in arms crying "unethical! unethical!" about doing something that is a) not illegal, b) not immoral, c) common, and d) trivial. But questioning my morals seems to be an obsession to some of you, so I'm happy to continue the conversation, if it gives you Something to Talk About.



(By the way, that last line...yeah. It's a movie. With Julia Roberts. PWNED!)

Last edited by LeeAnne; Oct 3, 2012 at 11:00 am
LeeAnne is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2012, 10:56 am
  #55  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 438
Originally Posted by orthar
The high-horse approach that several of the posters are taking here is puzzling. A big part of frequent flying, especially the type usually featured on FT, is using loopholes in airline programs in order to get better deals/upgrades/award tickets/etc. How hidden-city is less 'ethical' than buying obvious mistake fares (just an example) is beyond me.

The original posts were about any potential issues that might pop up when pulling a hidden city, not the complete and utter lack of morality and ethics that the OP must have to even consider lying to the airlines like this

So let's just stick to the facts, I'm sure the OP is a big girl and can make her own decisions according to her own moral code.

Sorry, pet peeve
I know, right? It's hilarious! I mean, isn't the whole POINT of FlyerTalk for frequent flyers to figure out ways to manipulate the arcane, bizarre system of air travel for the purpose of saving money? It's practically a science - how to wrangle more travel out of the airlines for less money. It's no different than people who will fly thousands of miles on "mileage runs" - there's a whole FORUM for that! And if you click on the forum, there's even an explanation from FlyerTalk:
Discussion of methods to maximize miles and/or points either through trips dedicated to no other reason than the miles/points, or through creative alteration of trips to extend their earning capacity in often unique ways.
Look at that, all you pollyannas crying foul over my "ethics!" People, LOTS of them, will do all sorts of things, including "creative alteration of trips" in order to maximize their travel dollars! And nobody thinks we are akin to bank robbers and rapists! (Well, nobody but cbn42, but what can be said about that, really.)
LeeAnne is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2012, 10:58 am
  #56  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: From ORK, live LCY
Programs: BA Silver, EI Silver, HH Gold, BW Gold, ABP, Seigneur des Horaires des Mucci
Posts: 14,217
You've bought a ticket to PHX but are making a journey to LAX, which costs more. Why should you be entitled to stiff the airline for the cost of the journey you're making? Comparisons with milk, doughnuts, etc. really are meaningless.
stifle is online now  
Old Oct 3, 2012, 11:07 am
  #57  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 438
Originally Posted by stifle
You've bought a ticket to PHX but are making a journey to LAX, which costs more. Why should you be entitled to stiff the airline for the cost of the journey you're making? Comparisons with milk, doughnuts, etc. really are meaningless.
Hmmm...methinks somebody hasn't read the thread, or at least struggles with reading comprehension. I'm tempted not to try to explain this to you, because you got it SO wrong that I'm not sure you could get it even if I did try. But I'll take a stab.

I bought a flight from LAX-PHX-SJO, and returning SJO-PHX-LAX. That's four legs of a flight:

LA to Phoenix
Phoenix to San Jose
San Jose to Phoenix
Phoenix to LA

I am not making any journeys for which I didn't pay. I paid for all four flights. I have tickets for them. But I'm only going to take the first three. I'm going to remain in Phoenix, and not continue on to LA. (Well, my mother, actually). We are doing nothing wrong.

And your point was?

Now, back to my breakfast of donuts and milk...
LeeAnne is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2012, 11:17 am
  #58  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 438
Originally Posted by stifle
You've bought a ticket to PHX but are making a journey to LAX, which costs more. Why should you be entitled to stiff the airline for the cost of the journey you're making? Comparisons with milk, doughnuts, etc. really are meaningless.
Another comment: I'm really curious how you think I could buy a ticket to PHX, and make a journey to LAX that I didn't pay for! That would be quite a feat. I'm imagining the scene at the gate:

Me: Here's my boarding pass for my flight to PHX
Gate Agent: But this plane is flying to LAX
Me: I know, but I want to get on THIS plane
Gate Agent: You want to get on THIS plane
Me: I am not the droid you're looking for
Gate Agent: You are not the droid I'm looking for
Me: Move along now
Gate Agent: Move along now



(Okay, okay, I acknowledge it's re-using a movie, but it still counts!)
LeeAnne is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2012, 11:51 am
  #59  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: From ORK, live LCY
Programs: BA Silver, EI Silver, HH Gold, BW Gold, ABP, Seigneur des Horaires des Mucci
Posts: 14,217
I got the return leg backwards. You paid for SJO-LAX, not SJO-PHX. You did not pay for four separate flights, they are all part of one journey that just happens to be connecting en route. In particular, if your SJO-PHX flight suffers irregular operations, they can put you on a flight to LAX and you will have to suck it up.

It is certainly not illegal, but it is against the airline conditions of carriage, and is, in my opinion, morally wrong.

And quit with the smart-aleck remarks, they're against the TOS and could lead to you being interpreted as a troll.
stifle is online now  
Old Oct 3, 2012, 11:57 am
  #60  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 438
Originally Posted by stifle
I got the return leg backwards. You paid for SJO-LAX, not SJO-PHX. You did not pay for four separate flights, they are all part of one journey that just happens to be connecting en route. In particular, if your SJO-PHX flight suffers irregular operations, they can put you on a flight to LAX and you will have to suck it up.

It is certainly not illegal, but it is against the airline conditions of carriage, and is, in my opinion, morally wrong.

And quit with the smart-aleck remarks, they're against the TOS and could lead to you being interpreted as a troll.
If there are any trolls in this thread, they are the folks who are irrationally crying "immoral" over someone who is doing nothing but finding a good deal on a flight. If this is "immoral", so is any effort in any situation to find a better deal on anything. Smart consumerism is not "immoral". Attempting to stretch your travel dollar has nothing to do with morality. That's silly, and in the context of this discussion, it is nothing more than an inflammatory red herring.

As for the "one ticket" concept, you are wrong. There are four flights. Four separate flights, each on a different plane, with a different flight number. I bought them together, and got a great deal by doing so. You could argue they were a "package deal", but not "one ticket". You can call it anything you want, but the basic fact is that there are four individual flights, and I'm ticketed on all of them. I will have four separate boarding passes.

I will use the ones I want, and not use the ones I want, at my discretion.
LeeAnne is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.