Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Does anyone listen the FA's

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Does anyone listen the FA's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 11:57 am
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CLE
Programs: UA,WN,AA,DL, B6
Posts: 4,359
Does anyone listen the FA's

Flying this morning FLL-CLE in F on a -700. During the first hour of the flight several Y passengers came up to use the F lav. Worst part is each time
the lav was occupied and they were standing outside the door which is also
a severe no no as this is right behind the cockpit doors. One man after doing his business stood in the F isle for over 10 minuntes.
buckeyefanflyer is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 12:04 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Was the curtain closed?
channa is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 12:08 pm
  #3  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LAS - I'm All In!
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, Marriott PP
Posts: 3,639
Originally Posted by buckeyefanflyer
Flying this morning FLL-CLE in F on a -700. During the first hour of the flight several Y passengers came up to use the F lav. Worst part is each time
the lav was occupied and they were standing outside the door which is also
a severe no no as this is right behind the cockpit doors. One man after doing his business stood in the F isle for over 10 minuntes.
It is highly likely that the cart was blocking the aisle preventing the Y passengers from using the lavs in the back.
trekwars2000 is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 12:10 pm
  #4  
30 Countries Visited
3M
100 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: UA LT 1K/DL Plat/Hilton LT ♦/Hyatt Carbonado/Wyndham ♦/Marriott PE .
Posts: 5,739
Nobody seems to respect cabin integrity anymore and the FAs don't seem to care. However, the scenario that you describe, i.e. standing 10 minutes behind the cockpit door, is probably a violation of FAA regs, so someone should have done something about it.
zombietooth is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 12:19 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CLE
Programs: UA,WN,AA,DL, B6
Posts: 4,359
Yes, it was closed but it was no secured so they just pushed through. I understand if they are doing service the cart blocks the passage to the rear.
My issue is it was several people and they need to make sure they watch the occupied sign as they are told they can't congragate outside the Lav door, especially in F.
buckeyefanflyer is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 12:20 pm
  #6  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Central Florida
Programs: MP 1K/Onepass Plat 1MM, SPG Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 565
Originally Posted by trekwars2000
It is highly likely that the cart was blocking the aisle preventing the Y passengers from using the lavs in the back.
And what would they do if there was no front cabin lav at all?

That is exactly what they should be doing. Waiting. In their seats.
walkerci is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 1:38 pm
  #7  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: PHL
Posts: 392
Originally Posted by zombietooth
Nobody seems to respect cabin integrity anymore and the FAs don't seem to care. However, the scenario that you describe, i.e. standing 10 minutes behind the cockpit door, is probably a violation of FAA regs, so someone should have done something about it.
This is why I give FAs A&Bs on US whenever I see them tell a Y pax not to use the F lav or not to put their bags in the F overhead until all of F is seated. I want the FAs to know I appreciate this and would like more of them to enforce these rules. Unfortunately, I don't hand these out for those reasons as often as I'd like to. :-/
javacodeguy is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 8:18 pm
  #8  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LAS - I'm All In!
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, Marriott PP
Posts: 3,639
Originally Posted by walkerci
And what would they do if there was no front cabin lav at all?

That is exactly what they should be doing. Waiting. In their seats.
Oh Christ... Come on... After 45 minutes of boarding... Then 30-45 min after push back before takeoff. Then a capt that doesn't want to turn off the seatbelt sign for 30-40 minutes (and by then a cart is is the aisle)... What do you want someone to do? Piss in their seat or perhaps yours? Or just use the lav they can get access to... I guess it is good there is a lav in the front...

[Unduly personalized remarks deleted by moderator.]

(BTW, just had my wife read this and said this post is not over the line because this has happened to her on numerous occasions...)

Last edited by Ocn Vw 1K; Apr 23, 2012 at 8:59 am Reason: To comply with the FT Rules which bars the now-deleted personal attack.
trekwars2000 is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 9:50 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
Originally Posted by trekwars2000
Oh Christ... Come on... After 45 minutes of boarding... Then 30-45 min after push back before takeoff. Then a capt that doesn't want to turn off the seatbelt sign for 30-40 minutes (and by then a cart is is the aisle)... What do you want someone to do? Piss in their seat or perhaps yours? Or just use the lav they can get access to... I guess it is good there is a lav in the front...

[Conforming edit by moderator of quoted material.]
(BTW, just had my wife read this and said this post is not over the line because this has happened to her on numerous occasions...)
Exactly. People who need to use the lav are going to try to use the lav even against the FAs wishes. Keep the seatbelt light on too long and you're going to have a crowd.

I rather suspect that's why the FAs didn't do anything--they knew it was simple biology at work.

Last edited by Ocn Vw 1K; Apr 23, 2012 at 9:00 am Reason: See above conforming edit.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 10:00 am
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,595
Originally Posted by buckeyefanflyer
Flying this morning FLL-CLE in F on a -700. During the first hour of the flight several Y passengers came up to use the F lav. Worst part is each time
the lav was occupied and they were standing outside the door which is also
a severe no no as this is right behind the cockpit doors. One man after doing his business stood in the F isle for over 10 minuntes.
Since when?

No FA has ever had an issue with me standing up near the cockpit in flight - the only time it is an issue is if the pilots want to come out - some may ask you to move, some don't care, and just ask you to physically move to the side a bit to open the door. I've spent multiple overnights hanging out by the cockpit door, having a drink, chatting with FAs etc as I don't sleep well, even at the front of the plane.
emma69 is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 10:37 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TPA, FL
Programs: United Gold, Hilton Diamond,Marriott Gold
Posts: 482
Hey if you gotta go, you gotta go. BUT! I wouldn't hang out in the galley to wait for someone. I would wait in my seat and if FC was the only lav open and I had to go badly...I'm going to the bathroom in FC lol

BTW---kinda off topic. Most US domestic pilots are chickens about turbulence. AS soon as there is a slight bump...on comes the fasten seat belt sign. I flew Air Canada a few weeks ago and as soon as we hit 10k feet..seat belt sign was off and remained off until descent. We had a few bumps along the way but nothing serious. We lived
PcolaPaul is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 10:54 am
  #12  
30 Countries Visited
3M
100 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: UA LT 1K/DL Plat/Hilton LT ♦/Hyatt Carbonado/Wyndham ♦/Marriott PE .
Posts: 5,739
Originally Posted by PcolaPaul
Hey if you gotta go, you gotta go. BUT! I wouldn't hang out in the galley to wait for someone. I would wait in my seat and if FC was the only lav open and I had to go badly...I'm going to the bathroom in FC lol

BTW---kinda off topic. Most US domestic pilots are chickens about turbulence. AS soon as there is a slight bump...on comes the fasten seat belt sign. I flew Air Canada a few weeks ago and as soon as we hit 10k feet..seat belt sign was off and remained off until descent. We had a few bumps along the way but nothing serious. We lived
Here, in the "Land of the Free", everybody must worry about the tort lawyers and it affects the way every business conducts itself.

I think that it is comical that a country like Japan, which has roughly 40% of the population of the US, can somehow function with fewer lawyers for the whole country than there are in Orange County, California.
zombietooth is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 12:21 pm
  #13  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 615
Originally Posted by javacodeguy
This is why I give FAs A&Bs on US whenever I see them tell a Y pax not to use the F lav or not to put their bags in the F overhead until all of F is seated. I want the FAs to know I appreciate this and would like more of them to enforce these rules. Unfortunately, I don't hand these out for those reasons as often as I'd like to. :-/
I really cannot believe that anybody would do such a thing. Talk about anally retentive - literally, in this case.

Does this DYKWIA think he owns the airline?
45128 is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 1:19 pm
  #14  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: En Route
Programs: Many
Posts: 6,798
I'm not OK with passengers from Y coming into the F cabin. If i'm paying for an F seat, part of the bargained for benefit in my ticket price is a smaller passenger to lavatory ratio, which should in theory ensure that I don't have to wait, or at worst have a short wait for the lavs. Passengers in the back shouldn't be able to come up front and force me to wait behind them "because they feel like it."
GetSetJetSet is offline  
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 1:33 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: TPA, FL
Programs: United Gold, Hilton Diamond,Marriott Gold
Posts: 482
Originally Posted by zombietooth
Here, in the "Land of the Free", everybody must worry about the tort lawyers and it affects the way every business conducts itself.

I think that it is comical that a country like Japan, which has roughly 40% of the population of the US, can somehow function with fewer lawyers for the whole country than there are in Orange County, California.
You make a good point. Corporations in the US are afraid of lawsuits. It's a darn shame.
PcolaPaul is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.