These threads always offer a fascinating view of humanity.
I don't smoke, can't stand the smell of smoke on my clothes, and don't plan to ever start smoking. However, the passing smell of cigarette smoke doesn't bother me in a place such as an outdoor balcony. When people sit and smoke at tables in outdoor cafes, it is a little more bothersome, and I'd prefer in those instances if they'd move off elsewhere to smoke and then return. It is unreasonable to expect a smoker to go completely off-property to have a cigarette when they can simply go outside and smoke (and let their clothes briefly air out before coming back into the room). I think this is a reasonable accommodation. Smoking/non-smoking floors are even better. |
Originally Posted by RobbieRunner
(Post 17859820)
My girlfriend? She can't deal with it at any time and for any reason. She'll get up and leave even if she was in the MIDDLE of her dinner if someone lit up a cigarette - even OUTSIDE. She barks if we walk PAST someone on the sidewalk smoking.
Both incidents happened a long time ago, but within 6 months of each other.
Originally Posted by etch5895
(Post 17862413)
These threads always offer a fascinating view of humanity.
I don't smoke, can't stand the smell of smoke on my clothes, and don't plan to ever start smoking. However, the passing smell of cigarette smoke doesn't bother me in a place such as an outdoor balcony. When people sit and smoke at tables in outdoor cafes, it is a little more bothersome, and I'd prefer in those instances if they'd move off elsewhere to smoke and then return. It is unreasonable to expect a smoker to go completely off-property to have a cigarette when they can simply go outside and smoke (and let their clothes briefly air out before coming back into the room). I think this is a reasonable accommodation. Smoking/non-smoking floors are even better. I understand how annoying it can be for a nonsmoker to smell the smoke. Stale smoke is even worse. Making accommodation for other people around you is what matters. Expecting very one in the world to comply with your likes and dislikes is unreasonable. When I smoked, I would never be the first one to smoke min mixed company without asking if it bothered anyone. But in public places where smoking was allowed or in the smoking section of an establishment, I expected to smoke without getting admonished by non-smokers. Does anyone remeber thre time when people lit up in movie theatres? |
I remember naively moving my seat on a transatlantic flight to an empty row near the back so I could lay down, not realizing that only a couple rows back was the section segregated for the smokers. That why a few rows were empty in the first place! Horrible, sick making 8 hours.
Look, I wish everyone who smokes could quit for their own health. So glad people are no longer allowed to smoke in enclosed public spaces where second hand smoke really is unpleasant. But smoking is not illegal and we need to allow reasonable accomodation, such as balcony smoking. |
Originally Posted by PDPhoto
(Post 17862153)
It would be fair to say the selfishness of smokers who want to smoke anywhere, regardless of a sensible smoking ban matches that of the 'power recliners' who drive their seat backs into the legs of the people behind them the nanosecond the wheels have left the ground, with absolutely no regard for the pain and discomfort their actions cause.
I wonder how many smokers are also 'power recliners? I'd think it would be a very high percentage. Then would it be equally fair to say that non-smokers think anyone's attempt to recline is a hostile act, to be countered by delivering a sharp knee in the back? :rolleyes: If it's not fair with one analogy, then it's not fair with the other. |
Paint with a broad brush much?
Seriously, I don't even recline my seat more than an inch just to be a bit more comfortable. I hate the knee slammers just as much as anyone else and wouldn't do it to anyone - even if it's being done to me. So how many other ways are you going to find to insult smokers, who, particularly in this thread, have shown they actually are considerate of others and are asking for just a bit in return? |
Originally Posted by LHR/MEL/Europe FF
(Post 17862197)
really? why do you think I would compare Australia when I am talking predominantly with US based citizens on a US based forum?
I check my facts before posting: my information comes from tobaccofreenurses.org. - an American organization. according to their statistics, 18 per cent of nurses smoke. I highly doubt next time you, a family member, friend or loved one ends up on the trauma table in an ER that you will actually refuse life saving care because one of the nurses or doctors smokes. |
Originally Posted by PDPhoto
(Post 17863536)
When the 'power recliner', I assume you are one, has forced their seat back down so hard you are unable to move, any jabs in your back are self inflicted as the victim has no movement available. When you are left with zero legroom and a seat back pressing firmly on your legs you can't actually move, and frequently are left in pain.
Not that you'd care about how your selfish, deliberate actions negatively affect anyone else. As with the balcony smoking, you have two people who want opposite things. They cannot both have what they want. They can each choose to be a bit flexible and respectful of each other, or can turn it into an unbearable situation for each other. It's not automatically the recliner who is the bad guy, nor is it automatically the smoker who is the bad guy. The only one who is consistently the bad guy is the one who flat-out refuses to even try to see from someone else's perspective. |
Many people have long legs that are already in contact with the seat back.
Where exactly do 'power recliners' expect us to move our legs when you have driven your seat back into our legs with great force? It's safe to assume the neither 'Mary' or 'dcpatti' have long legs and fail to understand the pain and discomfort caused by a 'power recliner' aggressively slamming a seat onto their legs. As for their filthy drug addiction, for that is the smokers condition, if it's a no smoking building, it means smoking is NOT allowed anywhere in the building, including on balconies? Why should non smokers have to endure the stink and harmful pollution caused by your disgusting addiction? |
Originally Posted by PDPhoto
(Post 17864555)
Many people have long legs that are already in contact with the seat back.
Where exactly do 'power recliners' expect us to move our legs when you have driven your seat back into our legs with great force? It's safe to assume the neither 'Mary' or 'dcpatti' have long legs and fail to understand the pain and discomfort caused by a 'power recliner' aggressively slamming a seat onto their legs. As for their filthy drug addiction, for that is the smokers condition, if it's a no smoking building, it means smoking is NOT allowed anywhere in the building, including on balconies? Why should non smokers have to endure the stink and harmful pollution caused by your disgusting addiction? What do you say to the hotels which tell us to smoke on the balcony? Or what about when we inform the hotel we will be doing so and they say OK? And I don't like the way I'm being spoken to, particularly when I go out of my way to be considerate, so I will just allow you to get on with your bashing without me. |
Originally Posted by Mary2e
(Post 17863584)
Paint with a broad brush much?
Seriously, I don't even recline my seat more than an inch just to be a bit more comfortable. I hate the knee slammers just as much as anyone else and wouldn't do it to anyone - even if it's being done to me. So how many other ways are you going to find to insult smokers, who, particularly in this thread, have shown they actually are considerate of others and are asking for just a bit in return? I smoke where it is permitted to smoke. I don't smoke where it is not permitted to smoke. I recline when it is permitted to recline, i.e. after wheels up. I don't recline when it is not permitted to recline. |
Message From A Moderator
I have recently deleted two posts which were direct personal attacks. Personal or ad hominem attacks will not be tolerated and will be removed immediately. Stay on topic. The topic Is Smoking on a Hotel Room Balcony a No-No?"
If one wants to discuss the evils of smoking, please do so in an OMNI forum (if OMNI-qualified). Be civil. Thanks for your cooperation. Obscure2k TravelBuzz Moderator |
Originally Posted by PDPhoto
(Post 17864555)
As for their filthy drug addiction, for that is the smokers condition, if it's a no smoking building, it means smoking is NOT allowed anywhere in the building, including on balconies? Why should non smokers have to endure the stink and harmful pollution caused by your disgusting addiction? BTW I'm 5'9" so my knees are no stranger to the setbacks. |
As this thread has turned into the standard smoking/non smoking bash a thon, I thought I'd point out how good things are in the US for nonsmokers.
I currently live in Indonesia most of the year. While there are smoking regulations on the books, nothing is enforced. It's common to have a smoker get on an elevator and keep smoking. A nonsmoking section in a restaurant means nothing. They just start smoking, and grind it out in the floor, or staff brings them an ashtray. I wish the biggest problem I had was someone smoking on an adjacent balcony! |
We're done here. The prior warning to remain civil was not heeded so thread closed. Ocn Vw 1K, Mod.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:04 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.