Putting all shades down so cabin is dark
#196
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
I would rather someone else's children be sleeping on my flights -- makes for quieter cabins -- than be awake and cranky.
Last edited by GUWonder; Dec 9, 2012 at 12:19 am
#197
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Programs: Emirates Silver, BA, Flying Blue, Virgin, IHG
Posts: 950
One of the difficulties is that not everyone on the flight is on the same body clock. I fly to from SE Asia on Emirates and on the DXB MAN flight which leaves in the morning I have already been travelling for 15 plus hours (sometimes after doing a full day's work if I take 2am flight from KUL) send so even though it is daytime I have to get some rest.
#198
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: south of WAS DC
Posts: 10,131
i really have no sympathy for all the darkers. i want to and do read pretty the entire time the plane is in the air(up to 12 hrs) the reading light system on many of the planes is really lousy. kindel availability is minimal. (they work best in lo light) i need the natural light. i checked my ticket, and i see nothing requiring me to keep my shade down. also, it appears to me that most who want the shade down want to play with some kind of an electronic toy, and have screen glare problem. the plane is not democracy at work. you want dark buy, the cabin.
by the way, most of my flights are tatl, in biz class, and on boeing planes(767&777)
by the way, most of my flights are tatl, in biz class, and on boeing planes(767&777)
#199
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Programs: United MileagePlus Silver, Nexus, Global Entry
Posts: 8,798
#200
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 48
If you want to sleep, put on an eye mask. If you want to work on something electronic and the window is causing a glare, turn your laptop the few degrees it would take to eliminate most of the glare or simple ask me to lower the shade a bit. As long as someone is polite about asking I'm happy to close the shade most of the way or even all of the way depending on where we are and what time it is at the destination.
#201
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,573
One of my favourite views is watching the dawn creep up as we fly over Ireland and then over the UK - I love the patchwork quilt of that land The only time I control the window is when I am in J, as I sit in the aisle in coach, and I've had several grumpy people moan at me! The fact they are already serving breakfast at that point, and cabin lights are up, tells me that it is time to wakey wakey eggs and bakey!
#202
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MN
Programs: Lots of programs, dirt on all of them!
Posts: 11,938
Seriously, I beg to differ: There is almost always something to see out the window, even if it's only beautiful blue skies. But just as seriously, I think some of the tension here can be addressed by simple courtesy. If I definitely want to gaze out the window, I'll leave it open. If I just want to be able to sneak frequent peaks while working or reading, I'll close it part-way. Otherwise, I'll close it, even though my preference sometimes is to let the light in.
Besides the views, which I like to look at, it is a known fact that natural light helps to conquer jetlag. I prefer a window seat for multiple reasons. I usually keep the window shade open at least a portion of the way on flights where I am trying to adjust to the local time at my destination.
#203
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: Flying Blue, easyJet Plus (!)
Posts: 1,762
#204
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: Flying Blue, easyJet Plus (!)
Posts: 1,762
If I have a window, and the view is not obscured by clouds, I'm unable to take my eyes away. The geography, geology, geomorphology on one flight (over land, not ocean) is worth a semester of classes.
Anyone so concerned about looking like a VIP who flies so much that it is all such a bore must be intellectually challenged or very needy for strangers' regard.
Anyone so concerned about looking like a VIP who flies so much that it is all such a bore must be intellectually challenged or very needy for strangers' regard.
Neil
#205
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,406
If the PVT on an aircraft is the swivel type in the armrest then there is not so much of a problem. But many airlines have a fixed screen.
#207
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: En Route
Programs: Many
Posts: 6,798
I generally comply with the FA request (although I will occasionally peek out), but really this seems to be the biggest issue on TPAC flights and who needs all the windows down? The eye mask does a fine job of blotting out all light for me.
#208
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2
Eighteen months without any progress
Have just watched BBC FastTrack issue in which Simon Calder addressed viewer complaint regarding ‘shades down’ (in daylight) command (SwissAir). The viewer asked if airlines had “the legal authority to do this as it’s not safety related”.
Response from SwissAir was that “there’s no special policy around windows (shades) being closed on their flights” … and although CC may “ask kindly” (!!) where sunlight is causing discomfort to other passengers, CC’s “ask kindly” is not mandatory and passengers are “welcome” to use the window shades as they wish. This presumably excludes take off/landing where, I understand, ‘shades up’ is (at least on the airlines I’m familiar with), considered (legally mandated?) a safety/situational awareness issue.
That sorts out SwissAir policy, only a thousand or so airlines to go, and the legal situation remains unresolved. Browsing from the first (3 July 2011) to latest at time of writing (13 Dec 2012), posts on this contentious issue (but not all posts between) it appears that the discussion hasn’t advanced one iota and remains locked in personal opinion.
I note that explanations offered by presumably sincere CC parroting company doctrine, range from a rather bizarre “to prevent radiation poisoning” (presumably why Captains and Co-Pilots glow in the dark) … (joke), through the less than plausible “to prevent/reduce jet lag” (my body clock adjusts to sunlight and I resent being ‘sprung’ into bright midday sunlight just before we land), to the entirely plausible “to allow passengers to sleep”.
The ‘to allow passengers to sleep’ explanation is reasonable at a cursory glance, however as I’ve never encountered an airline with a cabin reading lights ‘lockout system’ or even a ‘no cabin reading lights on during shades down’ policy, the ‘to allow passengers to sleep’ explanation can safely be dismissed as airline hogwash, as anyone who has endured ‘all night reading lights’ either side of them during a night or shades down flight will undoubtedly attest.
If you like to sleep when flying, regardless of time of day/night, and want to guarantee darkness and perhaps a little enhanced quietness, go buy a decent eye mask and a set of foam ear plugs, try for a seat (assuming economy long haul here) right in the middle of the mid section, where no one has to climb over you endlessly, you’re as far as possible from the disturbance of toilets (and their queues) and galley commotion and as far from the potential for bright direct sunlight as possible. Hunker down and enjoy (!).
So, to perhaps advance this, to date rather circular, exchange of personal opinion, does anyone out there have any knowledge of the legal situation … FAA, IATA, ICAO (etc) regulations/policies? References for any legal material?
How does the legal requirement to “follow instructions/directions of cabin crew” fit into all this? I don’t have a problem with ‘reasonable’ CC instructions, but that’s also part of the problem, my perception of ‘reasonable’ is entirely subjective. Shades up for landing/takeoff, OK. Don’t be loud or otherwise offensive, OK. Don’t vomit to your left or right, no problem. Don’t marvel at the Himalayas as the sun rises on a clear morning, ah … now we do have a problem.
If CC command everyone to lower their shades in daylight but have no difficulty with 50% of the passengers immediately converting to blazing reading lights in order to continue in the artificial gloom, is that reasonable? If I refuse to lower my shade on the grounds that shades up en-route isn’t in any way safety related, would I then be in breach of the requirement to “follow CC directions/instructions”? If the CC appeared alongside me with a bucket of water and commanded me to hold my breath put my head in it for 30 seconds, could I refuse without falling foul of the ‘follow directions/instructions’ requirement?
Gets messy, doesn’t it. I’ve held a Commercial Pilots Licence most of my adult life (non airline related) and spent a significant period of my life as an Air Traffic Controller at various international and domestic airports … I’ve never managed to find any legal specifics regarding the shades up/down/up/down issue or the legal extent of ‘follow CC instructions/requirements’. Surely someone with an interest in aviation law follows or is aware of this forum and can come up with something a little more objective than the endless subjective opinion advanced so far.
Response from SwissAir was that “there’s no special policy around windows (shades) being closed on their flights” … and although CC may “ask kindly” (!!) where sunlight is causing discomfort to other passengers, CC’s “ask kindly” is not mandatory and passengers are “welcome” to use the window shades as they wish. This presumably excludes take off/landing where, I understand, ‘shades up’ is (at least on the airlines I’m familiar with), considered (legally mandated?) a safety/situational awareness issue.
That sorts out SwissAir policy, only a thousand or so airlines to go, and the legal situation remains unresolved. Browsing from the first (3 July 2011) to latest at time of writing (13 Dec 2012), posts on this contentious issue (but not all posts between) it appears that the discussion hasn’t advanced one iota and remains locked in personal opinion.
I note that explanations offered by presumably sincere CC parroting company doctrine, range from a rather bizarre “to prevent radiation poisoning” (presumably why Captains and Co-Pilots glow in the dark) … (joke), through the less than plausible “to prevent/reduce jet lag” (my body clock adjusts to sunlight and I resent being ‘sprung’ into bright midday sunlight just before we land), to the entirely plausible “to allow passengers to sleep”.
The ‘to allow passengers to sleep’ explanation is reasonable at a cursory glance, however as I’ve never encountered an airline with a cabin reading lights ‘lockout system’ or even a ‘no cabin reading lights on during shades down’ policy, the ‘to allow passengers to sleep’ explanation can safely be dismissed as airline hogwash, as anyone who has endured ‘all night reading lights’ either side of them during a night or shades down flight will undoubtedly attest.
If you like to sleep when flying, regardless of time of day/night, and want to guarantee darkness and perhaps a little enhanced quietness, go buy a decent eye mask and a set of foam ear plugs, try for a seat (assuming economy long haul here) right in the middle of the mid section, where no one has to climb over you endlessly, you’re as far as possible from the disturbance of toilets (and their queues) and galley commotion and as far from the potential for bright direct sunlight as possible. Hunker down and enjoy (!).
So, to perhaps advance this, to date rather circular, exchange of personal opinion, does anyone out there have any knowledge of the legal situation … FAA, IATA, ICAO (etc) regulations/policies? References for any legal material?
How does the legal requirement to “follow instructions/directions of cabin crew” fit into all this? I don’t have a problem with ‘reasonable’ CC instructions, but that’s also part of the problem, my perception of ‘reasonable’ is entirely subjective. Shades up for landing/takeoff, OK. Don’t be loud or otherwise offensive, OK. Don’t vomit to your left or right, no problem. Don’t marvel at the Himalayas as the sun rises on a clear morning, ah … now we do have a problem.
If CC command everyone to lower their shades in daylight but have no difficulty with 50% of the passengers immediately converting to blazing reading lights in order to continue in the artificial gloom, is that reasonable? If I refuse to lower my shade on the grounds that shades up en-route isn’t in any way safety related, would I then be in breach of the requirement to “follow CC directions/instructions”? If the CC appeared alongside me with a bucket of water and commanded me to hold my breath put my head in it for 30 seconds, could I refuse without falling foul of the ‘follow directions/instructions’ requirement?
Gets messy, doesn’t it. I’ve held a Commercial Pilots Licence most of my adult life (non airline related) and spent a significant period of my life as an Air Traffic Controller at various international and domestic airports … I’ve never managed to find any legal specifics regarding the shades up/down/up/down issue or the legal extent of ‘follow CC instructions/requirements’. Surely someone with an interest in aviation law follows or is aware of this forum and can come up with something a little more objective than the endless subjective opinion advanced so far.
#209
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,406
hi basilfur1 and welcome to FT!
you are required by law to comply with lawful crew instructions (you are also required to comply with fixed and/or lighted signs and placards). generally speaking, lawful crew instructions are to do with safety. there is a plethora of law on this, a lot of it comes from international treaties which are ratified and then incorporated into national law.
being instructed to lower/raise your blinds is unlikely (except as you have pointed out for takeoff and landing etc) to be safety related. if you ignore that instruction there is no legal ramification.
however, these situations can quickly turn. if a passenger starts to become abusive, then they are caught by other laws which prevent threatening behaviour, or interfering with crew member duties. if the passenger remains cool, calm, polite and collected, then that's fine, but in some cases pax will take it too far.
I don't know why everyone focusses on sleep in the anti-shades-down camp?? we all know that passengers have eye masks if they need to sleep. that's not my issue. my issue is on those airlines where they have fixed video screens. they can suffer from glare making it very hard to see.
if you have screens on a pivot that can be moved that's fine, but many airlines in business class have the screen fixed in place. economy can be just as bad.
you are required by law to comply with lawful crew instructions (you are also required to comply with fixed and/or lighted signs and placards). generally speaking, lawful crew instructions are to do with safety. there is a plethora of law on this, a lot of it comes from international treaties which are ratified and then incorporated into national law.
being instructed to lower/raise your blinds is unlikely (except as you have pointed out for takeoff and landing etc) to be safety related. if you ignore that instruction there is no legal ramification.
however, these situations can quickly turn. if a passenger starts to become abusive, then they are caught by other laws which prevent threatening behaviour, or interfering with crew member duties. if the passenger remains cool, calm, polite and collected, then that's fine, but in some cases pax will take it too far.
I don't know why everyone focusses on sleep in the anti-shades-down camp?? we all know that passengers have eye masks if they need to sleep. that's not my issue. my issue is on those airlines where they have fixed video screens. they can suffer from glare making it very hard to see.
if you have screens on a pivot that can be moved that's fine, but many airlines in business class have the screen fixed in place. economy can be just as bad.