Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Small planes

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Small planes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 9:25 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 14
Small planes



We had our flights changed from a jet to a plane with 80 seats and the second leg of our trip is a plane with 52 seats .I would appreciate hearing from seasoned flyers re the pros and cons of relatively small planes
Henry43 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 9:32 am
  #2  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MEL
Programs: QF, VA, VN, BA, SQ, KC - all reds and blues.
Posts: 3,205
Those aren't small. I used to fly regularly on a Saab 340 (34 seats) and had some flights on a Twin Otter (18 seats - not that you'd ever have got 18 people into the plane). Islanders are even smaller.

Good side is you don't need to fight over who gets the front row as everyone gets on and off quickly. You don't get people arguing over locker space as the only things that fit in the lockers are handbags and coats. You get to feel that the cabin crew and flight crew are a close knit team - the same team on the Twin Otters).

The down side is that they can be somewhat cramped and noisy. And cold/wet when they park on stand with the doors open.
Mr H is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 12:54 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 352
52 seats isn't a small plane. Try a 10 seater Cessna!
MilesCollector is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 1:06 pm
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,096
Originally Posted by Henry43

We had our flights changed from a jet to a plane with 80 seats and the second leg of our trip is a plane with 52 seats .I would appreciate hearing from seasoned flyers re the pros and cons of relatively small planes
80 is not small! Try flying in a Cessna 152 with 4 seats!

Those regional CRJ's and ERJ's are fine...and in many ways more comfortable in that they can fly higher and faster than most of the big airliners. You feel turbulence a bit more, but not that much.

My biggest complaint about them is that airlines are using them on longer routes now, and it makes for cramped legs. I can't stand flights longer than 1.5 hours on them.
pinworm is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 1:30 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 14
Flying time

The first flight is nearly 4 hours .I am 6'6 ,will I have sufficient leg room ?
Henry43 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 1:32 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
40 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag DYKWIA:SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night:Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,523
Originally Posted by pinworm
80 is not small! Try flying in a Cessna 152 with 4 seats!
That sounds like a big 152!
N965VJ is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 1:36 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 946
Originally Posted by Henry43
The first flight is nearly 4 hours .I am 6'6 ,will I have sufficient leg room ?
I think 6'6 in Y on almost any aircraft would be uncomfortable for 4 hours, let alone a small plane!
vecta is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 1:39 pm
  #8  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MEL
Programs: QF, VA, VN, BA, SQ, KC - all reds and blues.
Posts: 3,205
Originally Posted by vecta
I think 6'6 in Y on almost any aircraft would be uncomfortable for 4 hours, let alone a small plane!
With respect, it's not the plane size that's the issue, it's the seat/pitch size. I have had this discussion with countless friends about cars and the fact that they are tall and/or drive long distances. I have tried to persuade them that the driver's seat is big enough, by definition, but they have often not agreed.
Mr H is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 1:49 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Purgatory
Programs: Too many to list. Status is a half dozen.
Posts: 9,236
Originally Posted by Mr H
With respect, it's not the plane size that's the issue, it's the seat/pitch size. I have had this discussion with countless friends about cars and the fact that they are tall and/or drive long distances. I have tried to persuade them that the driver's seat is big enough, by definition, but they have often not agreed.
Exactly. 31 inch pitch with thin, near nonexistent padding and limited recline sucks whether it's in the back of a 747 or the front of a CRJ or smaller. Economy plus on UA's 777 or CRJ? Neither is too awful.

The car argument - people just don't get it. It's the usual psychological aspect. I've sat in (not driven, sadly) large super cars where my US size 14 shoe will not fit over the accelerator without twisting my ankle. Plus the cockpits are always cramped in those for anyone 6' / 1.8m or taller, and weighing 220+ lbs / 100+ kilos.

Yet I can fit in a s.m.a.r.t. car or Mini Cooper with no trouble at all.
ArizonaGuy is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 1:57 pm
  #10  
Moderator: The British Airways Club
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Battleaxe Alliance
Posts: 22,183
Originally Posted by pinworm
80 is not small! Try flying in a Cessna 152 with 4 seats!
It will struggle to take off with four seats

152 is a 2-seater. I think you're thinking of a 172.
LTN Phobia is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 1:58 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SNA Rwy 20L
Programs: QF Silver
Posts: 703
Originally Posted by pinworm
80 is not small! Try flying in a Cessna 152 with 4 seats!
No kidding, it's a bear crawling in through that itty bitty door and I always bonk my head on the damned towbar. In a 152 ALWAYS go for an upgrade and get the emergency exit row with the window seat.

Last edited by Zarf4; Feb 8, 2010 at 2:00 pm Reason: Darn, a minute sooner and it might have been funny.
Zarf4 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 2:00 pm
  #12  
Moderator: The British Airways Club
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Battleaxe Alliance
Posts: 22,183
Originally Posted by Henry43
I would appreciate hearing from seasoned flyers re the pros and cons of relatively small planes
Cons:
Small planes are often turboprops and they are generally noisier than jets.
Seats on turboprops are often not as comfortable as those on jets (in terms of padding, pitch or width).
Small planes often don't have an oven.

Pro or Con, depending on how you look at it:
Seats on small planes don't always recline.
Limited overhead locker space.

Pros:
Quicker to get on/off.
LTN Phobia is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.