AwardWallet Hack
#16
Join Date: Jun 2015
Programs: BA Gold, *G, HH Diamond, Accor Plat, SPG Gold
Posts: 48
Yes, but the fact that AwardWallet displays all stored passwords in plain text is a major system weakness. There is no reason to do this.
If the passwords were not displayed in plain text then a hack on AwardWallet accounts would not allow access to the account username/passwords of all accounts tracked within (except if the password for those is the same).
If the passwords were not displayed in plain text then a hack on AwardWallet accounts would not allow access to the account username/passwords of all accounts tracked within (except if the password for those is the same).
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Upper Sternistan
Posts: 10,684
Yes, but the fact that AwardWallet displays all stored passwords in plain text is a major system weakness. There is no reason to do this.
If the passwords were not displayed in plain text then a hack on AwardWallet accounts would not allow access to the account username/passwords of all accounts tracked within (except if the password for those is the same).
If the passwords were not displayed in plain text then a hack on AwardWallet accounts would not allow access to the account username/passwords of all accounts tracked within (except if the password for those is the same).
#18


Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,738
Yes, but the fact that AwardWallet displays all stored passwords in plain text is a major system weakness. There is no reason to do this.
If the passwords were not displayed in plain text then a hack on AwardWallet accounts would not allow access to the account username/passwords of all accounts tracked within (except if the password for those is the same).
If the passwords were not displayed in plain text then a hack on AwardWallet accounts would not allow access to the account username/passwords of all accounts tracked within (except if the password for those is the same).
The plaintext passwords are ordinarily masked. AwardWallet asks for your AW password as a double confirmation before showing them. Of course, if the user password is weak, then the double confirmation doesn't make it any more secure.
I think their major mistake was in allowing members to use weak passwords, but I wouldn't blame them on the system design or displaying plaintext password. Both of which appears to be secure, had the user chosen a reasonably strong password.
Bottomline - no system in the world is be safe if the user choses a weak password.
#23
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vienna AUSTRIA
Posts: 549
dont forget the massive Iberia and BA Accounts (mine of course too
hacked , back in March this year.
Which a lot of people think that Award Wallet was the source and got hacked .
Think twice before giving away your valuable passwords to a company we dont really know. I myself have learned my lession.

hacked , back in March this year.
Which a lot of people think that Award Wallet was the source and got hacked .
Think twice before giving away your valuable passwords to a company we dont really know. I myself have learned my lession.
#24


Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,738
#26

Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 264
The best solution would be if AW requires another prompt for a two-factor password in order to display a clear-text loyalty password. This way even if a user did something dumb like leave their account logged in on a public computer, the clear text password wouldn't be displayed without another two-factor confirmation.
Also keep in mind that just because the loyalty passwords are being shown to you clear-text, doesn't mean they are stored that way. They have to be readable so AW can use them to check your points balance, so they can't be hashed, but I'll bet they are stored encrypted in their DB.
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Upper Sternistan
Posts: 10,684
This is pretty insecure.
#28



Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London, UK
Programs: bmi DC, BAEC
Posts: 1,959
I would say that a failure to require users to set complex passwords is a clear system weakness.
Further comments have highlighted the lack of password re-entry requirement for the display of saved passwords - sounds to me like another system weakness.
I agree that AW can be incredibly useful. Maybe they should only operate on the "locally saved" password basis. Thankfully I set-up my AW account like that from the start
Further comments have highlighted the lack of password re-entry requirement for the display of saved passwords - sounds to me like another system weakness.
#29


Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,738
I would say that a failure to require users to set complex passwords is a clear system weakness.
Further comments have highlighted the lack of password re-entry requirement for the display of saved passwords - sounds to me like another system weakness.
I agree that AW can be incredibly useful. Maybe they should only operate on the "locally saved" password basis. Thankfully I set-up my AW account like that from the start
Further comments have highlighted the lack of password re-entry requirement for the display of saved passwords - sounds to me like another system weakness.
I agree that AW can be incredibly useful. Maybe they should only operate on the "locally saved" password basis. Thankfully I set-up my AW account like that from the start

Just to clarify though, AW does force you to re-enter the master password before displaying your saved account password, so that part is secure.
#30
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus, HH Gold, Hertz PC, National Executive, etc.
Posts: 31,670
If you use the same password on AW as elsewhere, and your password is stolen elsewhere, how is AW supposed to prevent/reassure you?
But allowing a password to equal your id is simply unacceptable - for both the user and the vendor.
But allowing a password to equal your id is simply unacceptable - for both the user and the vendor.


