ZSL <->USB
Jun 21, 2004 | 3:12 pm
#1
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Freeload Univ. Where are you sitting?
Posts: 14,818
ZSL <->USB
Is that cryptic enough for you? 
A few years ago I was using a Zero-Slot Lan (ZSL), which uses either the serial port ot parallel port to connect two computers together. I found it very useful for a number of tasks - was using Lantastic-Z.
The only problem, of course, was the speed - ~115KB on the serial port, maybe 400-500K on the parallel connection. Also, that particular product only worked on DOS/Win3.X, though I seem to remember getting Win95 to recognize the network.
It strikes me that USB (even 1.X, although 2.0 would really fly) would be an ideal cheap technology to make this stuff viable again. I know Win9X provides some of this connectivity, not sure how complete it is.
Is there anything out there I could use for this? Or does Win9X have it built in? Do I need a hub, etc.? Have I revealed myself as too stupid to understand the answer?
A few years ago I was using a Zero-Slot Lan (ZSL), which uses either the serial port ot parallel port to connect two computers together. I found it very useful for a number of tasks - was using Lantastic-Z.
The only problem, of course, was the speed - ~115KB on the serial port, maybe 400-500K on the parallel connection. Also, that particular product only worked on DOS/Win3.X, though I seem to remember getting Win95 to recognize the network.
It strikes me that USB (even 1.X, although 2.0 would really fly) would be an ideal cheap technology to make this stuff viable again. I know Win9X provides some of this connectivity, not sure how complete it is.
Is there anything out there I could use for this? Or does Win9X have it built in? Do I need a hub, etc.? Have I revealed myself as too stupid to understand the answer?
Jun 21, 2004 | 3:32 pm
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
Jun 21, 2004 | 3:48 pm
#3
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Freeload Univ. Where are you sitting?
Posts: 14,818
Um ... not exactly. If I want to do file transfers, I can always use a ZIP drive or USB flash drive thingie.
A "real" LAN using USB would be the ideal solution. As I said, it may already be built in to Win9X; I just haven't dug around the docmentation that thoroughly yet.
A "real" LAN using USB would be the ideal solution. As I said, it may already be built in to Win9X; I just haven't dug around the docmentation that thoroughly yet.
Jun 21, 2004 | 3:51 pm
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
Originally Posted by BigLar
Um ... not exactly. If I want to do file transfers, I can always use a ZIP drive or USB flash drive thingie.
A "real" LAN using USB would be the ideal solution. As I said, it may already be built in to Win9X; I just haven't dug around the docmentation that thoroughly yet.
A "real" LAN using USB would be the ideal solution. As I said, it may already be built in to Win9X; I just haven't dug around the docmentation that thoroughly yet.
Jun 21, 2004 | 5:26 pm
#5
In Memoriam
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
Why not get a cross over network cable and toss a couple of $9 ethernet cards in the machines. Give them both IP addresses and share the drives, and 100 megs a second.