Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Technology
Reload this Page >

Processors question & laptop suggestions

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Processors question & laptop suggestions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 8:49 am
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Greener Pastures
Posts: 10,515
Processors question & laptop suggestions

I am pretty clueless when it comes to features of computers. I'm looking for a laptop (new or refurbished) that has a DVD (with CDRW if possible).

I noticed that Pentium 4's are the most expenisve and Anthalon/Celerons are cheaper - is there really any true difference?

My usage needs are very basic - I want to be able to access the internet, download photos from my camera (USB port), listen to music (MP3s & CDs), and watch DVD's. I'd like to have a laptop with at least 30GB hard drive and I assume a minimum 256 SDRAM, enough juice to watch 3hrs of DVD on a flight, and have Microsoft XP - I want to pay as little as possible. The capability to use wifi would be nice, but not 100% necessary. Any suggestions or recommendations? I know its alot, but if it were possible to keep the price under 700 or so, that'd be great.

Is that realistic or probably not. Cheapest machine I've been able to find is about 900.

Edited to add: http://www.overstock.com/cgi-bin/d2....PROD_ID=522678 is the one I was looking at

[This message has been edited by bhatnasx (edited 10-10-2003).]
bhatnasx is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 9:51 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited3M100 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
That deal isn't all that great, for a little more you'll get a new (non-reconditioned) machine with a 15" screen and built in wireless.

Like this one: http://www.techdepot.com/product.asp...affid=10000485

Check Froogle for more:

http://froogle.google.com/froogle?pr...&price=between
ScottC is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 12:19 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Greener Pastures
Posts: 10,515
Thanks Scott - I'll check out Froogle (didn't even know it existed!)
bhatnasx is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 12:34 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Bryn Mawr PA & Wailea HI
Posts: 15,726
I dont have a lotta experience, but I would guess 3 hr on a DVD on a typical 15" screen is pushing it, especially with a power hungry P4 (even with SpeedStep technology). You should easily get by with a P3 or even an old P2 processor. Also you may need a heavy duty battery for the full 3 hr.

Built in Wi-Fi is nice, but you can get many fine 802.11b PCMCIA cards to add Wi-Fi for less than $30. I have bought them for $20 and saw them on sale for $10.

MisterNice
MisterNice is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 7:05 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,673
A low-end processor will be plenty for your needs, no need for a power-hungry P4, Speedstep or not.

For low power consumption, the best CPU's are:
- Transmeta (not found in any 15" model, though)
- (ultra-)low-voltage P3 or Celeron (as above, mostly found in ultraslims)
- Pentium M (Centrino)
- late-model P3 or previous generation Celeron (100/133MHz FSB), preferably a proper laptop implementation with Speedstep

Early P3's (400-500MHz), all P2's, current 400MHz FSB Celerons, all P4's, and AMD 'Anthalon' processors have higher current draw.
monahos is offline  
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 11:00 pm
  #6  
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: SoCal to the rest of the world...
Programs: AA 1MM EXP. UA 2MM Lifetime Plat
Posts: 6,742
A Pentium M or Transmeta Efficeon would be ideal... Pentium 4's are really only good on systems that are desktop replacements where you won't expect GOOD battery life.

Also, don't compare Processor speeds from CPU type to CPU type... every architecture has its performance advantages and it's baggage...
NickP 1K is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 9:53 am
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22,778
Is there a reason why AMD Athlon or Duron gfot not mention at all?
Yaatri is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 10:49 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,673
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Is there a reason why AMD Athlon or Duron got not mention at all?</font>
they did, they did!

For marketing reasons (perception of high heat generation + pressure from Intel), Mobile Athlons are mostly found in larger value-line laptops at the few majors which use them (Compaq, Sony, ?). Note that with the ability to slow down to [email protected], a Mobile Athlon can be relatively thrifty when using PowerNow!
monahos is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 4:07 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Commuting around the mid-atlantic and rust-belt on any number of RJs
Programs: TSA Random Selectee Platinum, * Gold, SPG/HH/MR mid-tier, and a tiny bag of pretzels.
Posts: 9,255
I have not had a chance to try the DVD yet (as they shipped me the wrong drive), but I have a brand new Dell with a 1.8 (iirc) Pentium-M, sans the mini-PCI 802.11 and with a Cisco Aironet 802.11 PCMCIA card.

After only a few discharge cycles, I can get about 4 hours of work with the wireless card blazing away and some reasonably heavy disk access so long as I have speedstep backing things off. 14.x inch screen.

As an aside, Dell laptops are flimsy, and I'll be angry forever that my firm sourced the laptop concession away from IBM. I could beat somebody to death with my thinkpad and immediately use it to check e-mail. The Dell, by comparison, seems/feels/looks cheap and flimsy.

------------------
Don't feed the trolls.
ClueByFour is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 4:42 pm
  #10  
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: SoCal to the rest of the world...
Programs: AA 1MM EXP. UA 2MM Lifetime Plat
Posts: 6,742
AMD didn't get mentioned as they don't really have a true mobile core... It's akin to running a P4-M (which really pretends to be a mobile device as well).

For long battery life, ignore the current AMD notebooks... If you don't care about low battery life and want a true desktop replacement then by all means look at the AMD solutions as you would with the P4-M's
NickP 1K is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 6:21 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 834
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by bhatnasx:
Anthalon/Celerons </font>
Yes my friend you do need some guidance with computers

On a more reverential note I suggest just going with a basic setup that you could get at a Target or Wal-Mart even. $900 sounds right. The even low-end computers of today beat the socks off of the top of the line machines you could have bought a year or so ago, so it's all relative.

You need not fall into the market hype that companies keep hawking to upsell you to equipage that you really don't need. The incremental margin to them is huge, but the benefit to you in light of your stated needs would be marginal at best.

[This message has been edited by Jim Phillips (edited 10-13-2003).]
Jim Phillips is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.