Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Technology
Reload this Page >

Windows Defender a memory hog! Change default settings?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Windows Defender a memory hog! Change default settings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2019 | 11:57 am
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Intermountain West
Programs: Too many to list
Posts: 12,758
Windows Defender a memory hog! Change default settings?

In the last month o two it seems like my laptop is running a little slower at times. Memory used % is always high 30s to low 50s.

"Antimalware Service Executable" runs between 40mb and 150mb. Could this be the problem?

Would you suggest I change any of the default settings?

I also run the free version of Malwarebytes and "MB Service" is sitting at 147mb right now.

TIA
philemer is offline  
Old Feb 28, 2019 | 3:05 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Exclusively OMNI/PR, for Reasons
Posts: 4,186
If you think 40-150MB is a lot, don't ever look at what Chrome or Firefox are using...
philemer and Silver Fox like this.
Dodge DeBoulet is offline  
Old Feb 28, 2019 | 5:27 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus, HH Gold, Hertz PC, National Executive, etc.
Posts: 31,692
95MB (average of 40 and 150) would be 14th on my list, sorted by Working set (memory) in Task Manager right now (and 150MB would be 17th of Peak). Overall I'm at 46%.

I never worry about memory utilization, unless it's near 100% (which is hard to do outside of Photoshop/Lightroom compositing/rendering). I'd rather memory be used to cache items I may use again than just sitting there idle. It's very different than CPU or bandwidth utilization.

I seriously doubt 30-50% memory utilization is slowing anything down.

Fwiw, my MBAService is at 274MB and Nortonsecurity.exe at 20MB.
philemer likes this.

Last edited by CPRich; Feb 28, 2019 at 5:35 pm
CPRich is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2019 | 1:10 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
2M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Democratic People's Republic of the UK
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 21,956
FF is 47% of the memory on my X1 Carbon W10. How this compares with anything else I don't know but that is a heck of a lot. Been getting less and less impressed with FF over the years anyway and probably should look at something else. Netscape was alright as I recall.
Silver Fox is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2019 | 8:26 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Exclusively OMNI/PR, for Reasons
Posts: 4,186
Originally Posted by Silver Fox
FF is 47% of the memory on my X1 Carbon W10. How this compares with anything else I don't know but that is a heck of a lot. Been getting less and less impressed with FF over the years anyway and probably should look at something else. Netscape was alright as I recall.
Well, there's always Lynx at about 12MB:



Spanish likes this.
Dodge DeBoulet is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2019 | 10:53 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus, HH Gold, Hertz PC, National Executive, etc.
Posts: 31,692
Originally Posted by Silver Fox
FF is 47% of the memory on my X1 Carbon W10. How this compares with anything else I don't know but that is a heck of a lot. Been getting less and less impressed with FF over the years anyway and probably should look at something else. Netscape was alright as I recall.
Are you at 100% utilization and using disk to swap memory, slowing you down?

If not, it's intentional - using idle memory sitting around to pre-load frequently-used and cache recently-used items for performance reasons. IME, it's actually a very good software performance engineering approach. (I once had a team tackle an application that was written elsewhere and performing poorly, simply looking for caching and pre-loading opportunities. We reduced average response time from 15.5 seconds to 1.3)

And if you are, $50 to add 8GB RAM would be well-spent.
CPRich is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2019 | 12:38 am
  #7  
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,745
Originally Posted by Silver Fox
FF is 47% of the memory on my X1 Carbon W10. How this compares with anything else I don't know but that is a heck of a lot. Been getting less and less impressed with FF over the years anyway and probably should look at something else. Netscape was alright as I recall.
Out of curiosity, do you have a lot of tabs open? For FF, each tab or window is treated as a separate instance and consumes more ram. I believe Chrome does the same... Also, if a tab or window crashes, often that memory is not released back to the system until a reboot is done.

Just food for thought.
StuckInYYZ is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2019 | 3:08 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
2M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Democratic People's Republic of the UK
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 21,956
So, a close/reopen of FF puts it down to ~26%. I have about 14 tabs open. I don't feel that my computer is slowing down anyway just surprised at how much it was using when I checked (it is a work one and we have plenty of apps on it that do that) but it just seemed a lot for a browser. As for my Windows Defender to answer the OPs question in task manager it is ~5% that it is consuming. I am lazy at closing tabs so part of it is self-inflicted. Thanks.
Silver Fox is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.