Windows Defender a memory hog! Change default settings?
#1
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Intermountain West
Programs: Too many to list
Posts: 12,758
Windows Defender a memory hog! Change default settings?
In the last month o two it seems like my laptop is running a little slower at times. Memory used % is always high 30s to low 50s.
"Antimalware Service Executable" runs between 40mb and 150mb. Could this be the problem?
Would you suggest I change any of the default settings?
I also run the free version of Malwarebytes and "MB Service" is sitting at 147mb right now.
TIA
"Antimalware Service Executable" runs between 40mb and 150mb. Could this be the problem?
Would you suggest I change any of the default settings?
I also run the free version of Malwarebytes and "MB Service" is sitting at 147mb right now.
TIA
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus, HH Gold, Hertz PC, National Executive, etc.
Posts: 31,692
95MB (average of 40 and 150) would be 14th on my list, sorted by Working set (memory) in Task Manager right now (and 150MB would be 17th of Peak). Overall I'm at 46%.
I never worry about memory utilization, unless it's near 100% (which is hard to do outside of Photoshop/Lightroom compositing/rendering). I'd rather memory be used to cache items I may use again than just sitting there idle. It's very different than CPU or bandwidth utilization.
I seriously doubt 30-50% memory utilization is slowing anything down.
Fwiw, my MBAService is at 274MB and Nortonsecurity.exe at 20MB.
I never worry about memory utilization, unless it's near 100% (which is hard to do outside of Photoshop/Lightroom compositing/rendering). I'd rather memory be used to cache items I may use again than just sitting there idle. It's very different than CPU or bandwidth utilization.
I seriously doubt 30-50% memory utilization is slowing anything down.
Fwiw, my MBAService is at 274MB and Nortonsecurity.exe at 20MB.
Last edited by CPRich; Feb 28, 2019 at 5:35 pm
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Democratic People's Republic of the UK
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 21,956
FF is 47% of the memory on my X1 Carbon W10. How this compares with anything else I don't know but that is a heck of a lot. Been getting less and less impressed with FF over the years anyway and probably should look at something else. Netscape was alright as I recall.
#5
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Exclusively OMNI/PR, for Reasons
Posts: 4,186
FF is 47% of the memory on my X1 Carbon W10. How this compares with anything else I don't know but that is a heck of a lot. Been getting less and less impressed with FF over the years anyway and probably should look at something else. Netscape was alright as I recall. 


#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus, HH Gold, Hertz PC, National Executive, etc.
Posts: 31,692
FF is 47% of the memory on my X1 Carbon W10. How this compares with anything else I don't know but that is a heck of a lot. Been getting less and less impressed with FF over the years anyway and probably should look at something else. Netscape was alright as I recall. 

If not, it's intentional - using idle memory sitting around to pre-load frequently-used and cache recently-used items for performance reasons. IME, it's actually a very good software performance engineering approach. (I once had a team tackle an application that was written elsewhere and performing poorly, simply looking for caching and pre-loading opportunities. We reduced average response time from 15.5 seconds to 1.3)
And if you are, $50 to add 8GB RAM would be well-spent.
#7

Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,745
FF is 47% of the memory on my X1 Carbon W10. How this compares with anything else I don't know but that is a heck of a lot. Been getting less and less impressed with FF over the years anyway and probably should look at something else. Netscape was alright as I recall. 

Just food for thought.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Democratic People's Republic of the UK
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 21,956
So, a close/reopen of FF puts it down to ~26%. I have about 14 tabs open. I don't feel that my computer is slowing down anyway just surprised at how much it was using when I checked (it is a work one and we have plenty of apps on it that do that) but it just seemed a lot for a browser. As for my Windows Defender to answer the OPs question in task manager it is ~5% that it is consuming. I am lazy at closing tabs so part of it is self-inflicted. Thanks.

