Where's all that memory going?
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,781
BTW - these "60 watt" LEDs are rated at ~800 lumens, while the old bulbs claim 650 or so. They are really bright. I plan on replacing them with "40 watt" LEDs, so I can work at my desk without having to wear my sunglasses and save even more.
Now back to our regularly scheduled program.
Now back to our regularly scheduled program.
I discovered something interesting with LED bulbs: the "bulb" is purely for diffusion. I broke the glass on a relatively expensive 75W bulb, and the LED elements in the bottom work just fine bare (indeed, they probably are better cooled without it.) Very nice change from incandescents (toast) or worse yet CFLs (where the paranoid-of-mercury sorts would freak out on a break.)
I am really hoping to get my roof insulated in the next few years and when that's done, get solar panels. At ~35c per marginal kilowatt hour (ones closer to baseline are cheaper but we're up around 200% already) solar will pay off pretty quickly.
#17
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 460
I have many Windows open and each window has lots of tabs open on each window
and looking at Task Manager it looks like each tab is another process that takes up memory , from 952k down to 13k
but on task manager it does not say which tab name is eating the 952k and you cannot kill off just one tab thru Task Manager
is there an "Extended" task manager that adds the tab name in a Task Manager ?
the 952k tab may just be something stupid , but I have no how to find out !
and looking at Task Manager it looks like each tab is another process that takes up memory , from 952k down to 13k
but on task manager it does not say which tab name is eating the 952k and you cannot kill off just one tab thru Task Manager
is there an "Extended" task manager that adds the tab name in a Task Manager ?
the 952k tab may just be something stupid , but I have no how to find out !
As I type this, my Gmail tab is north of 1GB of memory, for example.
#18
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 916
If I understand what you are trying to do, hit Shift-Escape in Chrome and it will pop up a windows showing what each of your tabs is consuming. You can select a tab and click on the End Process button to close it.
As I type this, my Gmail tab is north of 1GB of memory, for example.
As I type this, my Gmail tab is north of 1GB of memory, for example.
I just checked on my Chromebook and its 418meg for Gmail
It would be nice if they just loaded the first page or 2 of Gmail, no reason you need all of it on the spot , or at least give you the option.
Chrome browser is only 209 meg , which even seems high ,
I think they just throw in everything on every program ,, including the "kitchen sink" and do not have levels you can use , from Basic web browsing to full on production,
and since memory is "cheap" there is no reason to do "tight" coding anymore , when you think back to all you could do on a Mac SE box with a meg of memory,
Are there websites that have set-up "low resource" set-ups for popular browsers like Chrome , firefox , etc ?
Last edited by LAXlocal; Nov 26, 2016 at 11:58 am
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,781
For Gmail: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/15049?hl=en
For Facebook: https://mbasic.facebook.com/
Also, the main thing that uses RAM on here is a mixture of aggressive caching (to seem faster) and the fact that Javascript is a huge steaming turd of a language.