Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Technology
Reload this Page >

[consolidated] Noise Cancel Headphones vs Earbuds

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

[consolidated] Noise Cancel Headphones vs Earbuds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2013, 12:38 pm
  #61  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 74
I said this in another thread but I got rid of my Bose qC-15 and switched over to in ear headphones. I got AirBuds (www.air-buds.com) for about 40$ and they really block out noise (through isolation) better than the bose and the memory foam tips makes them unnoticeable. I would recommend trying these out before spending all of the money on the bose. Other people on this thread have enjoyed them as well.
niceflyer1186 is offline  
Old Feb 8, 2013, 11:23 am
  #62  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 220
I ordered a pair of the Nokia Purity Pro cans, I was intrigued with the ability to connect via Bluetooth w/ APTx quality, and a wired connection if the need arose. The Parrot Ziks were almost a winner, but no APTx codec support I could see. I use QC-15s now, so I will do a comparison.
robroy90 is offline  
Old Feb 10, 2013, 4:53 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: BGM/ PHL
Programs: US (Silver, *A Silver), AA, Starbucks (Gold)
Posts: 2,242
I picked up a refurbished pair of Bose QC 15's... love them, only set of headphones I've ever had that completely filters out the HVAC noise at my apartment.
thomwithanh is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2013, 7:14 pm
  #64  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 355
I love my QC-15's. Worth every penny. Long battery life and excellent noise cancellation both in the air and on the ground.
dr88 is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2013, 9:53 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: BNE
Programs: QF,US,ANA
Posts: 323
I would go for Bose , especially if you can get them for a good price.
ianp is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2013, 9:12 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: LIM and DCA
Programs: Delta DM, Lufthansa Miles & More
Posts: 237
Another happy Bose I customer here. Expensive and take up a bit of room in the carry-on, but well worth it.
powerful pete is offline  
Old Feb 17, 2013, 4:54 am
  #67  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chicago, USA
Programs: TK Elite ...and blue, lots of blue...
Posts: 746
I'm very happy with the Senheisser PXC 360 BT.
Very comfortable even after hours of use. Good Noise Cancelling. Like the Bluetooth feature, although you are generally not allowed to use BT on a plane (you can turn it of and connect with a cable)
Ghentleman is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2019, 6:35 am
  #68  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hilton, Hyatt House, Del Taco
Posts: 5,378
QC20 uncomfortable after a while

Sorry to revive an old thread, but I'd like some advice on what to do.

I bought Bose QC25 and found it comfortable and completely pain-free wearing it ~12 hours to/from HKG and I think I slept better in-flight as result, although my ears did get hot after a while and I didn't like the space it took up on my carry-on. I did have to return it because one earpiece would stop transmitting sound from time to time.

Then I bought the in-ear Q20. I love that it doesn't take up space, my ears didn't get hot of course, and it was initially comfortable. But after a few hours, they felt uncomfortable in my ears. The discomfort wasn't intolerable, as I managed to keep them on the entire flight to/from TYO. But it was uncomfortable enough that it affected my ability to fall asleep. Plus I felt the noise-cancelling wasn't as good as QC25, although this is a minor point. I tried both the small and medium tips.

I was really hoping Q20 would work out for me, since I hate the space that QC25 takes up and I'm now nervous about going back to an over-ear NC headphone after the sound issue I experienced with the QC25 (I got a bum product that malfunctioned right from the get-go, but I've read other people developing similar issues after 1-year mark.). But I'm thinking about returning QC20. Comfort, reliability and portability/size are the most important factors for me.

Questions:
- I know that discomfort with in-ear depends on the person, but are there many folks out there who've switched from IE to over-ear for that reason?
- Am I wrong to expecting to be able to keep an IE on for 8-13hrs straight without discomfort? (I fly to Asia avg 4x a year) Are earbuds only meant to be worn for a few hours at a time?
- Are there any NC earbuds universally considered more comfortable than QC20?
- The issue with sound cutting out in one earpiece ... is this inevitable after a while in any over-ear NC headphone?
evergrn is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2019, 6:49 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 574
Evergrn, personal preference plays a part. Yes, I switched from IE and have been using Bose around-ear headphones for years. My husband prefers earbuds and dislikes the look of over-ear. Buds hurt my ears. Others find them very comfortable. You are not alone re finding IE buds uncomfortable.
AnaTravel is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2019, 7:24 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,381
Originally Posted by evergrn
- Am I wrong to expecting to be able to keep an IE on for 8-13hrs straight without discomfort? (I fly to Asia avg 4x a year) Are earbuds only meant to be worn for a few hours at a time?
can you pinpoint the discomfort?

afaik, the only difference between s/m/l is the size of the hook (the actual flanged earpiece is the same size)

is the hook digging into your ear? try it without the hook fully secure?



everyone that I've talked to loves the stayhear+ tip design (hook makes it secure, the flanged part doesn't require a full suction/seal which makes it less irritating)

I use it almost the entire time for 10+ hour flights, no issues (other than needing to charge it)

Last edited by paperwastage; Jan 6, 2019 at 7:30 am
paperwastage is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2019, 7:39 am
  #71  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hilton, Hyatt House, Del Taco
Posts: 5,378
Originally Posted by AnaTravel
Evergrn, personal preference plays a part. Yes, I switched from IE and have been using Bose around-ear headphones for years. My husband prefers earbuds and dislikes the look of over-ear. Buds hurt my ears. Others find them very comfortable. You are not alone re finding IE buds uncomfortable.
Okay, so you are like me. And my wife finds over-ear uncomfortable but IE to be no problem.

Originally Posted by paperwastage
can you pinpoint the discomfort?

afaik, the only difference between s/m/l is the size of the hook (the actual flanged earpiece is the same size)

is the hook digging into your ear? try it without the hook fully secure?

everyone that I've talked to loves the stayhear+ tip design (hook makes it secure, the flanged part doesn't require a full suction/seal which makes it less irritating)

I use it almost the entire time for 10+ hour flights, no issues (other than needing to charge it)
It's not the hook that's the problem. I can't even feel that part. It's the part that goes into the ear. And when I take it out, I can actually feel the skin dent/crease it's made on my outer ear canal.
AnaTravel likes this.
evergrn is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2019, 10:10 am
  #72  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Detroit; Formerly Dubai
Posts: 3,652
I've been reading a lot of rumors that Apple may be introducing noise cancellation with Airpods 2.0. I hate the size of over-the-ear headphones, but have an Australian flight coming up and am definitely packing them.
AnaTravel likes this.
Dubai Stu is offline  
Old Jan 6, 2019, 8:57 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Programs: UA Gold (.85 MM), HH Diamond, SPG Platinum (LT Gold), Hertz PC, National EE
Posts: 5,656
My concern with Airpods and airplanes are probably obvious, but if my cell phone happens to fall into the black hole of j class seats and is difficult to recover, how the heck am I going to find the airpods?

I'm still traveling with my QC15's, and I can only guess, but they are probably nearing 2,000 hrs on them, if not more. I'm partial to Bose in many, but not all products.
COSPILOT is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 6:43 pm
  #74  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,273
I finally converted. I used bluetooth (non-ANC) earbuds for years, insistent that the extra cost and bulk of ANC over-the-ear headphones wasn’t worth it. I still love my Forone Q9s if I really need to save space and weight, but I have to admit the Bose QC 35 IIs are phenomenal. I turned on the noise cancellation and was standing in my garage, and couldn’t hear the garage door open or close at all. It kills off probably 90-95% of the plane noise, and the remaining noise is unnoticeable with even soft music playing.

I don’t love everything Bose does with the EQ, but these are not intended to be audiophile headphones. They do their job incredibly well.
javabytes is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 7:22 pm
  #75  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hilton, Hyatt House, Del Taco
Posts: 5,378
Originally Posted by javabytes
I finally converted. I used bluetooth (non-ANC) earbuds for years, insistent that the extra cost and bulk of ANC over-the-ear headphones wasn’t worth it. I still love my Forone Q9s if I really need to save space and weight, but I have to admit the Bose QC 35 IIs are phenomenal. I turned on the noise cancellation and was standing in my garage, and couldn’t hear the garage door open or close at all. It kills off probably 90-95% of the plane noise, and the remaining noise is unnoticeable with even soft music playing.
So that I'm clear about QC35, can you verify that all of this is true for QC35? I'm trying to decide between QC35 vs QC25.
- It can be used with ANC, wired or wireless.
- If used wired (eg, airplane IFE) and your battery goes, you lose the ANC but you still get sound/music.
- It is no bulkier than QC25.
evergrn is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.