What would you choose: a discounted TUMI or a full price Briggs & Riley?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Asia
Posts: 66
What would you choose: a discounted TUMI or a full price Briggs & Riley?
Letīs say they offer you 2 carry-on suitcases:
a TUMI ALPHA
a Briggs & Riley (similar line, same size)
You would pay exactly the same for each. Which one would you choose to own and why?
Thanks.
a TUMI ALPHA
a Briggs & Riley (similar line, same size)
You would pay exactly the same for each. Which one would you choose to own and why?
Thanks.
#3
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 49,038
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8G4 Safari/6533.18.5)
Yea. Not even close. I would pay a lot more for B&R.
Originally Posted by edj3
B&R because of the warranty.
#4
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: CLT
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott Titanium Elite, HH Diamond
Posts: 253
Two factors if it was my decision:
1.) The size. You identified it as a carry-on. Is is an 18 or 20"" or something larger up to 22"?
2.) Somewhat less important, Personal preference.
Aesthetically, I prefer Tumi. It's a personal preference and nothing else. I own both brands, a 20" Tumi which I have owned for 2 years and have had to gate check two or three times and it looks brand new as well as a 22" B&R I've had for 1.5 years which has been checked multiple times and while somewhat ratty looking, I don't worry if it gets trashed or broken because of the warranty.
Assess your travel. If it's a 22", If you fly a lot of RJ's or board towards the end of the process when the bins are full and may be forced to check, I'd think about the B&R. If we're talking about a 18"-20", you fly almost exclusively mainline jets, or have priority boarding then I think you pick whichever one you like best.
1.) The size. You identified it as a carry-on. Is is an 18 or 20"" or something larger up to 22"?
2.) Somewhat less important, Personal preference.
Aesthetically, I prefer Tumi. It's a personal preference and nothing else. I own both brands, a 20" Tumi which I have owned for 2 years and have had to gate check two or three times and it looks brand new as well as a 22" B&R I've had for 1.5 years which has been checked multiple times and while somewhat ratty looking, I don't worry if it gets trashed or broken because of the warranty.
Assess your travel. If it's a 22", If you fly a lot of RJ's or board towards the end of the process when the bins are full and may be forced to check, I'd think about the B&R. If we're talking about a 18"-20", you fly almost exclusively mainline jets, or have priority boarding then I think you pick whichever one you like best.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: LAX
Posts: 10,909
Tumi - for better IMO styling but obviously that's a matter of personal preference.
Warranty issue seems overblown for most - several years down the road I'll probably buy a new piece and both brands are solid enough to last several years of reasonable travel.
Warranty issue seems overblown for most - several years down the road I'll probably buy a new piece and both brands are solid enough to last several years of reasonable travel.
#7
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BOS
Posts: 183
Bolding mine. The BR warranty is for life, no exception. I won't need to replace my bag several years down the road . . . or at least not at my own expense.
#9
In Memoriam
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
If the plan is to replace it after several years of use, than way waste the money on a high end brand? Any of the mass market luggage will cost a fraction of these bags and be just as good.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: LAX
Posts: 10,909
If we were to buy based on warranty then Costco's Kirkland should be the top choice - 1/3 of B&R prices with lifetime warranty.
I like Tumi in general but I would never buy it at retail prices - all my pieces are from Costco, outlet, Nordstrom Rack etc (on average 50% off) making it more competitive with generic brands.
Whether it's worth buying Tumi or B&R vs more generic Samsonites, Delseys etc IMO is more in the realm of buying Chevy vs Benz or buying clothes from Walmart vs Neiman Marcus or getting $100 vs $1000 suit or booking coach vs business. You get an incremental improvement in features and style but at a much higher price - just decide what's important to you in a particular area. For checked bags if needed I use Travelpro and Delsey as I see no need for premium brand's styling and features there.
#11
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 138
B&R!
The TUMI Alpha is great stuff - but even so, B&R for me by a long shot and I like gadgetfreak would pay more for B&R.
I am comparing the TUMI Alpha with, say the B&R KR306X.
Finish on B&R is better, features, organization and flexibility are unsurpassed and great durability. And apart from the warranty issue, which I agree is maybe overplayed, B&R has the option for shoulder carry since it comes with D-rings (and a shoulder strap). TUMI cannot be shoulder-carried since they don't have D-rings. Shoulder carry is not a big issue for this style of bag, but I have found I REALLY want it in those few situations where I need it!
And while you are are making comparisons in this highly selective 'business computer bag' category, I would put the Victorinox Rolling Trevi in the same league as the TUMI (or slightly above), but both below the B&R.
Oh, and by the way, TUMI also apparently thinks that B&R is too good because there was a thread here a while back saying that TUMI would not allow Harrods to also carry B&R (but I do not know this personally).
I am comparing the TUMI Alpha with, say the B&R KR306X.
Finish on B&R is better, features, organization and flexibility are unsurpassed and great durability. And apart from the warranty issue, which I agree is maybe overplayed, B&R has the option for shoulder carry since it comes with D-rings (and a shoulder strap). TUMI cannot be shoulder-carried since they don't have D-rings. Shoulder carry is not a big issue for this style of bag, but I have found I REALLY want it in those few situations where I need it!
And while you are are making comparisons in this highly selective 'business computer bag' category, I would put the Victorinox Rolling Trevi in the same league as the TUMI (or slightly above), but both below the B&R.
Oh, and by the way, TUMI also apparently thinks that B&R is too good because there was a thread here a while back saying that TUMI would not allow Harrods to also carry B&R (but I do not know this personally).
#13
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ORD & MKE
Programs: Airlines: UA-CO, NH, AA, and DL Hotels: SPG, Accor, PC, and Marriott
Posts: 1,827