"HIGH" Terror risk
#61
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .57 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,101
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">You'll notice that, all things considered, the ACLU hasn't made a whole lot of noise about these restrictions the last few weeks.</font>
#63
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: أمريكا
Posts: 26,764
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by GUWonder:
Obviously no one quoted any American muslims, especially the ones that live or work in downtown Manhattan.</font>
Obviously no one quoted any American muslims, especially the ones that live or work in downtown Manhattan.</font>
Great society.
d
#65
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Currently a man without a country; American Airlines-3MM, Executive Platinum; US Airways-Doesn't Matter AAnymore; Hilton-Diamond; Starwood-Platinum; Hyatt-Diamond
Posts: 702
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by homer37:
On a lighter note, some of us who grew up in the civilized portion of Missouri wouldn't be offended at all if Branson disappeared... </font>
On a lighter note, some of us who grew up in the civilized portion of Missouri wouldn't be offended at all if Branson disappeared... </font>
#66
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Here, there, and everywhere. Hip, hip, so hip to be square.
Posts: 1,122
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by homer37:
On a lighter note, some of us who grew up in the civilized portion of Missouri wouldn't be offended at all if Branson disappeared... </font>
On a lighter note, some of us who grew up in the civilized portion of Missouri wouldn't be offended at all if Branson disappeared... </font>
Mook
#67
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Here, there, and everywhere. Hip, hip, so hip to be square.
Posts: 1,122
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by SPN Lifer:
What, if any, restrictions have been imposed as a result of being at Threat Level Orange, or, indeed, for any reason during the last few weeks?</font>
What, if any, restrictions have been imposed as a result of being at Threat Level Orange, or, indeed, for any reason during the last few weeks?</font>
This merely provides details of what will be done at Threat Level Marmalade. How it is done is another matter, and the source of most of the concern around here.
Quite frankly, if someone tells me as I'm dropping a co-worker at the airport to get out and wait for my vehicle to be searched, I'm telling them to get f%&@ed.
Mook
------------------
The future of US domestic air travel:
"Please watch your head as you exit the aircraft."
#69
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22,778
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by jmartin:
I suppose a key question on terror alerts is this:
Is the intelligence driving the policy?
Or is the political policy driving the intelligence?
</font>
I suppose a key question on terror alerts is this:
Is the intelligence driving the policy?
Or is the political policy driving the intelligence?
</font>
I am not sure who is driving whom. But I do get a feeling that resourses are not being used to their best ability.
#70
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22,778
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Mook:
People are more likely to willingly yield their rights when they are convinced their safety is at stake.
To give an example: You'll notice that, all things considered, the ACLU hasn't made a whole lot of noise about these restrictions the last few weeks.
Why?
I'm guessing it's not because they feel that many of the moves don't blatantly violate our civil rights.
But because the "risk" is perceived as so high by the average American (I'll refrain from comment on the intelligence thereof), that they fear being marginalized if they speak up now.
A fear that certainly wouldn't be present if there was no orange "high terror risk" in the air.
Perception is reality.
Sorry to be so cynical. I'll sit back now and calmly await arrival of the agents.
Mook
</font>
People are more likely to willingly yield their rights when they are convinced their safety is at stake.
To give an example: You'll notice that, all things considered, the ACLU hasn't made a whole lot of noise about these restrictions the last few weeks.
Why?
I'm guessing it's not because they feel that many of the moves don't blatantly violate our civil rights.
But because the "risk" is perceived as so high by the average American (I'll refrain from comment on the intelligence thereof), that they fear being marginalized if they speak up now.
A fear that certainly wouldn't be present if there was no orange "high terror risk" in the air.
Perception is reality.
Sorry to be so cynical. I'll sit back now and calmly await arrival of the agents.
Mook
</font>
Sorry about the rant. But you are right on the mark Mook. I am glad to see more and more people seeing through the farce of this security circus is.
[This message has been edited by Yaatri (edited 02-13-2003).]
#71
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22,778
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by richard:
As I am sure others who live in the Washington DC area can attest, there is an hysteria that is sweeping this area.
It reminds me so much of when I was a little kid and we practiced "drop drills" at school. The whole bomb shelter thing.
I am not saying we will never be hit by terrorism. I am questioning the level of hysteria -- there might as well be a biological attack, people here already feel under attack. It's not healthy for children and other living things!
</font>
As I am sure others who live in the Washington DC area can attest, there is an hysteria that is sweeping this area.
It reminds me so much of when I was a little kid and we practiced "drop drills" at school. The whole bomb shelter thing.
I am not saying we will never be hit by terrorism. I am questioning the level of hysteria -- there might as well be a biological attack, people here already feel under attack. It's not healthy for children and other living things!
</font>
Two changes of clothes for all of us. Toothpaste, tooth brush, deodorant, cologne, q-tips, dual voltage traveliing iron, dual voltage travelling hairdryer, two canon cameras, a video camera, all packed in two carry-ons, a stroller for our younger son, and two day packs. No sharp opejcts since I sport a beard and my wife does not shave on a daily basis. Finally the most lethal weapon of all four NW tickets to Frankfurt. Surprisingly light load for a family of four. But it's only for the weekend.
#72
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Programs: reformed ex basic Member
Posts: 3,148
I find this thread both amusing and depressing. It is good to see that some of the US citizens are questioning their leaders. That is what a democracy is for. Good luck with your extra 'safety'.
It was upsetting to read that some people think all muslims are terrorists. I live in a City bombed by the IRA. Does that mean I can say that all Catholics are terrorists ? Of course not.
One last point. Mrs Thatcher went to war against Argentina in the 1980's, she easily won re-election the following year on a wave of patriotism. Now what is so big about 2004 in the US ?
Call me a cynic, call me what you want. I don't care, I just want to win Miss World.
It was upsetting to read that some people think all muslims are terrorists. I live in a City bombed by the IRA. Does that mean I can say that all Catholics are terrorists ? Of course not.
One last point. Mrs Thatcher went to war against Argentina in the 1980's, she easily won re-election the following year on a wave of patriotism. Now what is so big about 2004 in the US ?
Call me a cynic, call me what you want. I don't care, I just want to win Miss World.
#73
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: AA EXP/mm, Travelholics Anonymous
Posts: 2,962
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by GK:
[B]It was upsetting to read that some people think all muslims are terrorists.
</font>
[B]It was upsetting to read that some people think all muslims are terrorists.
</font>
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/030212/5/rsd8.html
Please be clear, just because someone may admire and advocates mass murder of innocent civilians, does not mean that they are actually a terrorist. These muslims that Reuters interviewed, might admire Bin Laden and his repeated mass murders of innocent Americans for their entire life, and yet never lift a finger to hurt anyone. This was a cross section of Muslims from all over the world who had congregated in Saudi Arabia for the special Hadj pilgrimage. This made suspect the earlier claim that the Hadj was a time for peaceful reflection. I guess the Saudi King "custodian of the holy sites" making guests of honor out of 1000 family members of mass murdering suicide terrorists made the idea even more suspect.
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"> I live in a City bombed by the IRA. Does that mean I can say that all Catholics are terrorists ? Of course not.
</font>
</font>
Well not quite, the pope would also have to exalt 1,000 family members of the murderous IRA terrorists as "guests of honor" for the holy event, paying for them to show up.
Finally, the ArchBishop of Ireland would have to say equivalent something to what this muslim religious leader said:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=18773
[This message has been edited by benoit (edited 02-14-2003).]
#74
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Programs: reformed ex basic Member
Posts: 3,148
Thank you for your comment. I was asking a rhetorical question, which I quite clearly stated was not valid logically.
I was simply trying to put the perspective across that what may seem a newsworthy statistic is infact prejudiced in presentation.
If it wasn't so 'provocative' it wouldn't have been 'news'. Go ask a crowd at a mid-west evangelical church on their opinions, they won't be balanced either.
Enjoy your code red. What is higher than that ? Bright red ? Infra red ?
[This message has been edited by GK (edited 02-14-2003).]
I was simply trying to put the perspective across that what may seem a newsworthy statistic is infact prejudiced in presentation.
If it wasn't so 'provocative' it wouldn't have been 'news'. Go ask a crowd at a mid-west evangelical church on their opinions, they won't be balanced either.
Enjoy your code red. What is higher than that ? Bright red ? Infra red ?
[This message has been edited by GK (edited 02-14-2003).]