Closing threads because "risk of database corruption"
#3
Ambassador, New England
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Maineiac, USA
Programs: Amtrak, WN RR, Choice
Posts: 2,655
Here's one example: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/briti...es-ba-com.html
Edit to add: There are a few in the BA forum that have been closed for this reason, but there might ones in other fora that have also. My search for "database corruption" (with quotes) mainly turned up the ones in the BA forum.
Edit to add: There are a few in the BA forum that have been closed for this reason, but there might ones in other fora that have also. My search for "database corruption" (with quotes) mainly turned up the ones in the BA forum.
#4
Moderator: American AAdvantage




Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT EXP; HH LT Diamond, Matre-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
Thank you.
The issue is mega threads slow vB down and can indeed lead to database corruption, as I understand the issue. E.g. I notice when working on these threads I get errors and unexpected slowness affecting different operations. The lengthier the thread, the worse it seems (I speak anecdotally because I haven't documented and measured formally.)
Moderators have been instructed to pare these mega threads near the beginning of the year, and in different fora this might be handled somewhat differently.
Whether this is done by closing a thread and starting a new one, archiving off older posts, etc. the end result is more manageable threads. These days, wikis make the transition easier, so we often transfer (and may update) wiki contents to new threads on the same topic.
Perhaps one of our Admin reps can expand.
The issue is mega threads slow vB down and can indeed lead to database corruption, as I understand the issue. E.g. I notice when working on these threads I get errors and unexpected slowness affecting different operations. The lengthier the thread, the worse it seems (I speak anecdotally because I haven't documented and measured formally.)
Moderators have been instructed to pare these mega threads near the beginning of the year, and in different fora this might be handled somewhat differently.
Whether this is done by closing a thread and starting a new one, archiving off older posts, etc. the end result is more manageable threads. These days, wikis make the transition easier, so we often transfer (and may update) wiki contents to new threads on the same topic.
Perhaps one of our Admin reps can expand.

