FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Technical Support and Feedback (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/technical-support-feedback-386/)
-   -   Mods: Can we get rid of the :rolleyes: emoticon? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/technical-support-feedback/1065178-mods-can-we-get-rid-rolleyes-emoticon.html)

Olton Hall Mar 20, 2010 3:18 pm


Originally Posted by cheepneezy (Post 13614459)
+:rolleyes:

+:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Mackieman Mar 20, 2010 3:32 pm

Without :rolleyes:, we would not have the :rolleyes:tree:



:rolleyes:
:rolleyes::rolleyes:
:rolleyes::rolleyes:
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
:rolleyes:
:rolleyes:

Steph3n Mar 20, 2010 3:42 pm

ONe face answers this:
:rolleyes:

we need a new one now however, :trolleyes: can someone make one?

colpuck Mar 20, 2010 4:19 pm

http://rolleye.com/sickgreen.jpg

PTravel Mar 20, 2010 4:59 pm


Originally Posted by judolphin (Post 13612334)
Points

  • People on Flyertalk are good enough at condescension to begin with
  • The emoticon usually does nothing but make the person using it look like a jerk
  • It does not promote discussion in any way
  • It helps threads that are emotional to begin with, degenerate more quickly

Counterpoint

  • This emoticon is a nearly foolproof way to weed out the douches and lame-o's who think they're clever

Thoughts?

Agreed. The only emoticon that is really necessary for written communication is the ;), to show that what was written was in jest.

LeSabre74 Mar 20, 2010 5:04 pm

It should only be replaced when we get the "you're f&*@ing idiot" emoticon.

Renard Mar 20, 2010 5:45 pm

Please stop all the hatin' against the :rolleyes:. It is just too useful, especially on FT:eek:

FriendlySkies Mar 20, 2010 8:20 pm


Originally Posted by goalie (Post 13613516)
if we get rid of it, how else will my posts about the tsa over in the ts&s forum make any sense ;)

+11111111111 (Power of 10)

rolov Mar 20, 2010 8:48 pm

IMO The only way to get rid of the :rolleyes:, is to replace it with a waaahhhhh emoticon :td:

jrzyshawn Mar 20, 2010 11:20 pm


Originally Posted by sbm12 (Post 13613322)
I thought it was Talkb:rolleyes:ard.

:p

:rolleyes:


Originally Posted by belynch (Post 13614436)
:eek:


:mad:


:o


:rolleyes:

:rolleyes::rolleyes:


Originally Posted by cheepneezy (Post 13614459)
+:rolleyes:

++:rolleyes:


Originally Posted by sfogate (Post 13614528)
I love this emoticon. It sums up what I'd really like to say but can't. :D

:rolleyes:, honestly.

The lady with the bag's man candy :rolleyes:.


Originally Posted by Olton Hall (Post 13614559)
+:rolleyes::rolleyes:

+:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Xyzzy Mar 21, 2010 8:47 am

What a :rolleyes: idea. :td:

Vive le :rolleyes:!

Sohan Mar 21, 2010 10:30 am

When I first seen the :rolleyes: on FT, I thought it was suppose to be a sad face haha.

SFOTerry Mar 22, 2010 6:33 am


Originally Posted by xyzzy (Post 13617703)
What a :rolleyes: idea. :td:

Vive le :rolleyes:!

are you sure :rolleyes: is masculin?

jbcarioca Mar 22, 2010 6:51 am

We need the emoticons. How boring it is if we're left with only text.

judolphin Mar 22, 2010 2:11 pm

You guys are awes:rolleyes:me.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:56 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.