TAP - Security Breach Cockpit Visit
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto (YYZ)
Posts: 6,279
TAP - Security Breach Cockpit Visit
July 21 TP259 flight from Lisbon to Toronto.
Flying in Business Class, just prior to taking off one of the cabin crew (an older gentleman with a tablet who was wearing glasses and was not a flight attendant - I believe he was the person in-charge) came and spoke with the passenger seated in 3E and he took him into the cockpit. A few moments later the passenger (3E) came and spoke with the passenger in 1B (they appeared to be related father and son) and they both entered the cockpit and didn't emerge from the cockpit until the aircraft had taken-off and the seatbelt sign was turned off.
I believe this action to be illegal and can’t understand why TAP would allow this serious security breach to happen.
Can anyone confirm if this is against aviation security regulations?
I have filed a complaint with TAP along with Portuguese and Canadian aviation authorities.
Flying in Business Class, just prior to taking off one of the cabin crew (an older gentleman with a tablet who was wearing glasses and was not a flight attendant - I believe he was the person in-charge) came and spoke with the passenger seated in 3E and he took him into the cockpit. A few moments later the passenger (3E) came and spoke with the passenger in 1B (they appeared to be related father and son) and they both entered the cockpit and didn't emerge from the cockpit until the aircraft had taken-off and the seatbelt sign was turned off.
I believe this action to be illegal and can’t understand why TAP would allow this serious security breach to happen.
Can anyone confirm if this is against aviation security regulations?
I have filed a complaint with TAP along with Portuguese and Canadian aviation authorities.
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto (YYZ)
Posts: 6,279
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
The time to voice your concern as publicly spirited individual was when the the incident happened, or when the flight landed.
Raising the issue now, through an internet chatroom, while seeking to out the flight attendant through his description is .. well, not very nice.
Raising the issue now, through an internet chatroom, while seeking to out the flight attendant through his description is .. well, not very nice.
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto (YYZ)
Posts: 6,279
Outing the FA would be posting their name or better yet a photo.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: where lions are led by donkeys...
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 20,343
Is there a grown-up around that you can get to explain the point to you then?
Let's make it simple: you should have opened your mouth at the time instead of hiding behind the internet like a little kid peeping out from behind their mother's skirt.
Let's make it simple: you should have opened your mouth at the time instead of hiding behind the internet like a little kid peeping out from behind their mother's skirt.
#9
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: TLV
Programs: UA Platinum, Avis Chairman, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, GA Pilot
Posts: 3,225
There's a similar thread on the El Al forum right now. Not sure about Portuguese aviation law but in most countries that sort of thing is at the Captain's discretion. I have been invited into the cockpit on El Al by the captain who was a friend of a friend. I sat in the jump seat for landing at JFK. I have a friend who's a captain on AA and I'm sure if I ever ended up on one of his flights that I'd be invited up there too.
That said, I'm glad you're not my neighbor as you seem like the type who would call the city to complain if my grass got too long.
That said, I'm glad you're not my neighbor as you seem like the type who would call the city to complain if my grass got too long.
#10
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,770
Whether or not there are any grounds for complaint I don't know.
#12
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PEK
Programs: A3*G, UA Gold EY Silver
Posts: 8,958
I believe this action to be illegal and can’t understand why TAP would allow this serious security breach to happen.
Can anyone confirm if this is against aviation security regulations?
I have filed a complaint with TAP along with Portuguese and Canadian aviation authorities.
Can anyone confirm if this is against aviation security regulations?
I have filed a complaint with TAP along with Portuguese and Canadian aviation authorities.
I believe this is not illegal and is purely at the captain's digression - usually reserved for friends and family of TP pilots/mechanics.
There was no security breach, as only authorized people may be in the cockpit, and the captain has the authority to make this authorization. Other (mostly legacy) airlines in Europe also allow this sort of thing.
In the US, this is expressly prohibited, and pilots will lose their license if an unauthorized person enters the cockpit. A captain flying a US-based airline does not have the authority to make this sort of authorization.
Nothing to see here, moving right along.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver • DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold, AA EXP, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 21,602
You don't have a clue about Portugese aviation regulations nor TAP corporate policy.
You just ignorantly assume that they are the same as Canada and Air Canada.
#14
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: TLV
Programs: UA Platinum, Avis Chairman, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, GA Pilot
Posts: 3,225
Is that true? If so must be a relatively recent rule change. When I was doing pilot training the pilot pretty much had discretion to do whatever he/she wanted - hence the often crazy stories you hear about pilots removing pax from flights before takeoff because a crew member complains.
#15
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto (YYZ)
Posts: 6,279
In contacting TAP they have full disclosure of who I am and what my concern is.
Last edited by imverge; Jul 22, 2017 at 3:34 pm Reason: spelling