![]() |
Originally Posted by jfe
(Post 8832671)
And you don't find this annoying?
|
Originally Posted by Punki
(Post 8831183)
Actually, essxjay, I was referring to the original identification photo gallery. You remember the one with the stick man figure of ... arturo.
Originally Posted by essxjay
(Post 8830994)
Also, the old Members Gallery was rolled into [the current FT Photo Gallery].
http://gallery.flyertalk.com/gallery/Members-Gallery As you can see, large chunks of it are already alphabetized. It's a small matter of reorganization, should someone take the time and care to own it. |
Establishing a much updated, and very readily available, identifying photo gallery would certainly be a excellent community-building option.
|
Originally Posted by Punki
(Post 8830931)
I am just throwing out suggestions to stimulate discussion so I will have a better feel for the feelings of the general membership, which I guess is my new volunteer job.
|
Originally Posted by Abby
(Post 8832581)
But do we only get to pick one at a time? If so, I'm going to fly this one, just as a convenience. ;););)
|
Originally Posted by Canarsie
(Post 8833499)
Why not have a poll posted at the beginning of this thread?
|
A poll would be an excellent idea, Canarsie, but this thread has become way too complicated, and is currently addressing too many issues for a single poll. Once the newTalkBoard is activated, it would probably be a good idea to make specific motions on these ideas, one thread at a time, and then, perhaps, activate polls.
You will notice that this thread was started by my honorable colleague, Cholula, in June of 2006, relating specifically to "smilie choices". I have done a quick search of the TalkBoard forum and can find no threads discussing this idea so I am wondering what happened. It is possible that the proposal never come up as a motion? Perhaps Cholula or some other current TalkBoard member can enlighten us. Obviously enough interest has been generated by the discussions today, that several motions are in order. I, like techgirl, find it really exciting to see a healthy, active, civil (for the greater part) exchange of ideas and opinions. IMHO, this is a very good thing, and hope that many more such disscusions, where people activiely present their own opinions, and refrain from getting snarky about other people's opinions, will ensue. |
Originally Posted by jfe
(Post 8832512)
I say we don't use smilies or anything fancy, flyertalk should only be accessed via a telnet client
|
Originally Posted by Punki
(Post 8833537)
You will notice that this thread was started by my honorable colleague, Cholula, in June of 2006, relating specifically to "smilie choices". I have done a quick search of the TalkBoard forum and can find no threads discussing this idea so I am wondering what happened. It is possible that the proposal never come up as a motion?
|
Originally Posted by Kiwi Flyer
(Post 8833679)
- . .-.. -. . - ..--.. .. .... .- ...- . - --- -- .- -.- . -.. --- .-- .. - .... -- --- .-. ... . -.-. --- -.. .
|
Originally Posted by Punki
(Post 8833537)
I have done a quick search of the TalkBoard forum and can find no threads discussing this idea so I am wondering what happened. It is possible that the proposal never come up as a motion? Perhaps Cholula or some other current TalkBoard member can enlighten us.
But that's how it sometimes works. We discuss an idea/concept in this forum and if the posters make a compelling enough case, usually one or more TB members will make a motion. Evidently no TB member felt that this was a compelling issue at the time. Or maybe we were doing something far more important at the time like voting not to establish a Singles Forum. ;)
Originally Posted by ozstamps
(Post 8829691)
As a prime example we had a totally bizarre motion to vote to NOT establish a Singles Forum. A complete and utter waste of time and near abuse of process IMHO, but we voted on it all the same. And the vote was published, and Talkboard looked like dills - IMHO.
|
Originally Posted by lucky9876coins
(Post 8831719)
What isn't?:confused:
|
Originally Posted by RichMSN
(Post 8835312)
What we talk about here.
|
My votes:
No to avatars (to difficult to police the content) Yes to more smilies btw, what happened to the ignore user feature???? |
Actually photo avatars could be very simple to police and not involve the moderators in any way.
All we would have to do is set up a Photo Approval Committee. Photos would be submitted and then approved by the Committee prior to going live. This way, no general member or modertor member would ever be required to look at any of the pictures unless they really wanted to. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:16 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.