Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Community > TalkBoard Topics
Reload this Page >

Proposal: Do Not Consider Posts in OMNI For PostCount

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Proposal: Do Not Consider Posts in OMNI For PostCount

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2006 | 7:30 am
  #46  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 55,213
Originally Posted by Cholula
A couple years ago it was decided that posts in OMNI weren't going to be included in a member's post total. And all previous posts to OMNI were then retroactively removed from everybody's post total. I remember some posters losing several thousand posts overnight.
A few months later a decision was made to reverse this and to include OMNI posts in a member's post total. That decision still stands today.
Just a FYI.
I'm a FT member now for over 5 years and frankly I still don't understand why anyone would care about post counts. I wouldn't mind if the counter were eliminated from public view. It isn't like you get greater perks if you have the insane # of posts that I have, for example. 1/2 of them are there probably because of baseball.

Have any of you ever watched "Who's Line is it Anyway"? Whether the English version with Clive Anderson or the California version with Drew Carey, the message remains the same: the points given out just don't matter. Same thing with post count in FT; it means nothing.
Analise is offline  
Old May 10, 2006 | 8:04 am
  #47  
Moderator, El Al and Marriott Bonvoy, FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SIN
Programs: SQ PPS, Mar LTT, Hyatt LTG, AA LTG, LY, HH, IC, BA, DL, UA SLV
Posts: 12,157
Back to the topic, the proposal is to not count non-travel related forum posts in the count. I don't see the reason for this to be an issue.

The only situation where there is a real benefit from a higher count is getting access to OMNI and Coupon Connection.

It is OMNI posts that are the ones that wouldn't be counted.

You can't post in OMNI before you have access.

All of the posts that got you the higher post count that gave you access to OMNI must have been in travel-related forums.

There is no benefit to removing the non-travel-related forum posts from the post count.

Q.E.D.
yosithezet is offline  
Old May 10, 2006 | 9:40 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In Exile
Programs: QFF WP :-0, AC, FlyBuys, Porter's Liquor Store, Mother's Helper
Posts: 2,496
Originally Posted by MovieMan
Additionally, blatant post padding is not allowed in the lounge threads or Community Buzz. No such rule in OMNI.
You obviously haven't seen the Lounge Forum on Air Canada where this exact problem occured without recourse to the member other than he/she taking a personal timeout after becoming drunk with FT exposure.

If post counts do count in OMNI, then the policy as written in the sticky in that forum needs to be updated to reflect the same.
GoldFlyer is offline  
Old May 10, 2006 | 12:43 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,645
Originally Posted by MovieMan
Yet in reality they are not--two examples: a) posters with large enough post counts are labeled "Evangelists," with obvious connotations as to their "knowledge;"
What "obvious" connotations? Don't you think people are smart enough to understand that these types of labels are simply hokey features of the BB software?

and b) in general, many FTers naturally also tend to give more credibility to posters with more post counts than those with less, whether deserved or not. This happens both everyday and during special occasions such as the TB elections.
Do you have some evidence of this? Again, people here are savvy enough to not give credence to a post based on simply the number of posts.

I think this is an important enough issue to be addressed by the TalkBoard.
I don't. I think it silly that people get their panties in knot over post counts. Good grief.
outtolunch is offline  
Old May 10, 2006 | 6:32 pm
  #50  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Thanks for the Memories !!!
Posts: 10,737
Originally Posted by MovieMan
Additionally, blatant post padding is not allowed in the lounge threads or Community Buzz. No such rule in OMNI.
Another problem in those lounge threads is that sometimes they are used by certain cliques to berate other FT'ers.......
Also how does one quantify what "blatant" post padding is? On some of those large lounge threads some of the participants have over a 1000 posts........would that be called post padding?
Q Shoe Guy is offline  
Old May 10, 2006 | 7:42 pm
  #51  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Heading to Costco for more popcorn...
Programs: UA 1K 2MM Flier, SPG Plt, Hilton Dia
Posts: 8,461
Originally Posted by sadiqhassan
...If an FTer had 7,000+ posts, it is very unlikely that they would waste so many hours of their life typing "I agree" or just a smiley....
Actually there are at least a few of them who have done just that. Take away the posts that consist only of "wrong" or or the like, and you'd see a significant postcount drop in those cases.
cawhite is offline  
Old May 10, 2006 | 8:01 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: CVG
Programs: SQ PPS, DL Gold Medallion
Posts: 2,508
Originally Posted by outtolunch
What "obvious" connotations? Don't you think people are smart enough to understand that these types of labels are simply hokey features of the BB software?
You really don't get the connotations of a label like "Evangelist"? No, I certainly don't think everyone understands that this is just a "hokey feature." What makes you think they do? And if it's a hokey feature, why have it?

Originally Posted by outtolunch
Do you have some evidence of this? Again, people here are savvy enough to not give credence to a post based on simply the number of posts.
No, I don't have "evidence of this," just as you don't that this is not the case. But my points are logical ones, and more common-sense than yours.

Originally Posted by outtolunch
I think it silly that people get their panties in knot over post counts. Good grief.
Fine. Thanks for sharing your opinion.
MovieMan is offline  
Old May 10, 2006 | 8:05 pm
  #53  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
In order to discuss whether or not posts in OMNI should count towards post stats, I think we need to understand why we have posts displayed at all.

If it is to connote some kind of knowledge, then OMNI posting should be a liability .

If it is to stroke egos, as is the goal of frequent flyer programs in general (in my opinion), then we should keep them and allow OMNI to count.

If it is to merely keep track of how big of a loser one is for posting all day on an internet forum, then they should be kept.

So the question is, what do the post counts do for us? Once we answer this, we will have a better idea of whether or not OMNI should count towards them.
magiciansampras is offline  
Old May 10, 2006 | 8:15 pm
  #54  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Programs: AA Platinum Pro, AC *S, Marriott Gold Elite, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 9,793
Originally Posted by magiciansampras

So the question is, what do the post counts do for us? Once we answer this, we will have a better idea of whether or not OMNI should count towards them.
It varies person by person. For me, I just like having the number there. Not for others to see, but just for me to realize how much I have posted at FT.

Cheers
sadiqhassan is offline  
Old May 10, 2006 | 8:30 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Commuting around the mid-atlantic and rust-belt on any number of RJs
Programs: TSA Random Selectee Platinum, * Gold, SPG/HH/MR mid-tier, and a tiny bag of pretzels.
Posts: 9,255
Plan on taking out the CC posts too, while the TB is at it.
ClueByFour is offline  
Old May 10, 2006 | 11:56 pm
  #56  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by Q Shoe Guy
Another problem in those lounge threads is that sometimes they are used by certain cliques to berate other FT'ers.......
Also how does one quantify what "blatant" post padding is? On some of those large lounge threads some of the participants have over a 1000 posts........would that be called post padding?
True. Sometimes with a willing victim, sometimes without.
GUWonder is offline  
Old May 11, 2006 | 3:20 am
  #57  
Moderator: LGBTQ+ Travel, India-based Airlines and India; FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Asia
Programs: Yes!
Posts: 15,582
Originally Posted by cawhite
Actually there are at least a few of them who have done just that. Take away the posts that consist only of "wrong" or or the like, and you'd see a significant postcount drop in those cases.
Agree entirely! So how about something like:

- Every post in a travel, miles & points related forums adds one to the post count.
- Every post in OMNI subracts one from the above post count.


I can just picture certain posters going around with negative post counts now.
AJLondon is offline  
Old May 11, 2006 | 3:24 am
  #58  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Nights
3M
100 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,351
Originally Posted by AJLondon

Agree entirely! So how about something like:

- Every post in a travel, miles & points related forums adds one to the post count.

- Every post in OMNI subracts one from the above post count.

Great suggestion. I might suggest Talkboard votes on that one.
ozstamps is offline  
Old May 11, 2006 | 4:36 am
  #59  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited3M100 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
I propose that posts about post counts do not count towards ones post count.
ScottC is offline  
Old May 11, 2006 | 5:34 am
  #60  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: BWI
Programs: AA PLT and that's that!
Posts: 8,350
Originally Posted by ScottC
I propose that posts about post counts do not count towards ones post count.
tazi is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.