Question 6: Moderators vs. TalkBoard Influence
#16
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,927
Originally Posted by techgirl
I often think of the "structure" on FT as being much like that of the US Government. We have an Executive Branch (Randy and the House of Miles), a Legislative Branch (TalkBoard), and a Judicial Branch (TalkTeam).
The moderators (TalkTeam) aren't there to create the structure but to make sure that it is enforced according to the Constitution (Terms of Service) and in line with what the TalkBoard intended. Whereas the moderators should act in accordance with previously decided policies and procedures - the TalkBoard and House of Miles both decide when those policies and procedures should change.
The moderators (TalkTeam) aren't there to create the structure but to make sure that it is enforced according to the Constitution (Terms of Service) and in line with what the TalkBoard intended. Whereas the moderators should act in accordance with previously decided policies and procedures - the TalkBoard and House of Miles both decide when those policies and procedures should change.
The TOS prohibits peronal attacks upon moderators (and I agree with that).
It also prohibits "On-board discussion of moderator decisions - including post deletions and member discipline". I don't agree with that -- as long as no attacks are made -- but I agree it is in the TOS.
The TOS, nowhere, prohibits discussion of moderation policies.
In fact, when a moderation policy question was raised on ORP, a moderator locked the thread. Randy re-opened it, saying "Actually i find this a fair question. My concern over the typical posts about moderation, is that it's not about moderation, it's about an individual who happens to be a moderator and as we have TOS rules in place to discourage talking about other members in person, that same rule would reasonably apply to a moderator as well if that moderator is named as the sole reason for the rant.
This question seems more about a process of moderation."
Obviously, with no TOS prohibition on discussing moderation policies, and Randy having made it clear that he does not object to it, there is no reason not to allow it.
Moreover, the TalkBoard has never voted not to allow moderation policy discussions on TalkBoard Topics.
Yet they are, indeed, prohibited there. In fact, not only are discussions of moderation policy not allowed, but a mere mention of moderation can get a post removed and a warning letter sent to the poster.
(I would be happy to provide a specific example of this except it could run foul of the TOS provision I cited above. If the TalkBoard Forum moderators give me permission to do so, I will give exact details.)
Therefore, what you basically have is moderators having decided, on their own and without a TOS prohibition or TalkBoard approval, that there can be no discussion of moderation policies on TalkBoard Topics.
This is not a case where, as you said, moderators "act in accordance with previously decided policies and procedures."
#17
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: back to my roots in Scotland!
Programs: Tamsin - what else is there to say?
Posts: 47,843
Since moderation is outside of Talkboard remit, there would be no reason to have discussion of moderation on Talkboard Topics - it would be as off topic as discussing SQ's new business class seats. It would also raise a false expectation that it is something Talkboard is concerned with - when it's pretty clear that it is not.
#18
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,927
Jenbel, here is a link to the TOS, please show me where it says that moderation is off limits to the TalkBoard.
On the other hand, the official TalkBoard description says that "TalkBoard (TB) is a User Advisory Council consisting of members of the community whose purpose is to provide input regarding FlyerTalk feature requests, action requests that fall outside the scope of already-established policies and procedures, and general user issues as may be directed to them by the FlyerTalk member population and the Flyer Talk host."
Certainly moderation policies (as opposed to day-to-day overseeing of moderator's actions) are of concern to the general user.
TalkBoard, in fact, has taken certain decisions which impact on moderation policy:
** It voted that "Recognizing the need for consistent standards and that moderators aren't always best positioned to parse the value of any particular pitch, effective immediately all charitable solicitation must be submitted to and approved by Randy Petersen or his designee before being posted on Flyertalk. Any other charitable solicitation is a violation of Flyertalk Rules & Guidelines."
**It voted that "On 5 May 2005, the TalkBoard recommend that Randy bring back the signature lines...without specific topic prohibitions, but rather a strongly worded message to the membership that controversial or offensive signature lines will be removed at his discretion."
(This put the question of what signatures are permissible in Randy's hands, not those of the moderators.)
**Quite recently it voted that "That no candidate will have disciplinary action taken against them by any other candidate who is an active moderator."
TalkBoard does not oversee moderation. Randy does that. TalkBoard is responsible for approving the TOS and for policy questions -- and moderation policies are no exception.
Therefore, FlyerTalkers should be allowed to make suggestions concerning moderation policies in the TalkBoard Topics Forum.
Let's never lose track of one very important fact: It is the general membership which gives FlyerTalk its value.
If TalkBoard were to disappear, FlyerTalk would continue.
If moderation were to be ended, FlyerTalk would continue.
If Randy were to close this site completely, there is a very good possibility that someone else would start one and a reborn FlyerTalk would arise.
But without the membership, there is no FlyerTalk. Its concerns can not be dismissed out of hand or be forbidden to be discussed.
On the other hand, the official TalkBoard description says that "TalkBoard (TB) is a User Advisory Council consisting of members of the community whose purpose is to provide input regarding FlyerTalk feature requests, action requests that fall outside the scope of already-established policies and procedures, and general user issues as may be directed to them by the FlyerTalk member population and the Flyer Talk host."
Certainly moderation policies (as opposed to day-to-day overseeing of moderator's actions) are of concern to the general user.
TalkBoard, in fact, has taken certain decisions which impact on moderation policy:
** It voted that "Recognizing the need for consistent standards and that moderators aren't always best positioned to parse the value of any particular pitch, effective immediately all charitable solicitation must be submitted to and approved by Randy Petersen or his designee before being posted on Flyertalk. Any other charitable solicitation is a violation of Flyertalk Rules & Guidelines."
**It voted that "On 5 May 2005, the TalkBoard recommend that Randy bring back the signature lines...without specific topic prohibitions, but rather a strongly worded message to the membership that controversial or offensive signature lines will be removed at his discretion."
(This put the question of what signatures are permissible in Randy's hands, not those of the moderators.)
**Quite recently it voted that "That no candidate will have disciplinary action taken against them by any other candidate who is an active moderator."
TalkBoard does not oversee moderation. Randy does that. TalkBoard is responsible for approving the TOS and for policy questions -- and moderation policies are no exception.
Therefore, FlyerTalkers should be allowed to make suggestions concerning moderation policies in the TalkBoard Topics Forum.
Let's never lose track of one very important fact: It is the general membership which gives FlyerTalk its value.
If TalkBoard were to disappear, FlyerTalk would continue.
If moderation were to be ended, FlyerTalk would continue.
If Randy were to close this site completely, there is a very good possibility that someone else would start one and a reborn FlyerTalk would arise.
But without the membership, there is no FlyerTalk. Its concerns can not be dismissed out of hand or be forbidden to be discussed.
#19
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: back to my roots in Scotland!
Programs: Tamsin - what else is there to say?
Posts: 47,843
Originally Posted by Dovster
Jenbel, here is a link to the TOS, please show me where it says that moderation is off limits to the TalkBoard.
It's deeply disappointing, that, come TB election season, the favourite sport seems to be suggesting that moderators are running out of control and that somehow more control needs to be exercised over them - particularly since the mods have no right of reply or ablity to respond to such allegations.
Fortunately, that picture is not one I recognise from my experience of using FT. Maybe I'm lucky, or law-abiding, but I've never seen a moderator acting capriciously, or for anything other than what they think is in the best interests of FT. And as a member of FT, I have to go and pack for the London do, where we have nearly 200 members of FT meeting together. I'm very well aware of the importance of the members - if I thought they were unimportant, I don't think I'd have put quite as much time, effort and resources into this mammoth organisational challenge as I have - and I've got the new grey hair to prove it!
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Worth TX
Programs: Earned status with AA, DL, SPG, HH, Hyatt, Marriott, Seabourn, NCL, National, Hertz...I miss my bed!
Posts: 10,927
Originally Posted by Dovster
The TOS prohibits peronal attacks upon moderators (and I agree with that).
Therefore, what you basically have is moderators having decided, on their own and without a TOS prohibition or TalkBoard approval, that there can be no discussion of moderation policies on TalkBoard Topics.
Believe me, there have been many times that I *do* wish that we could openly discuss a moderation decision, especially when what we have done has cleaned up a huge posting mess so that general members can no longer see what the member iin question did to earn the privilege of being moderated in the first place. Since we cannot discuss, when said member then goes and complains that they were unfairly censored (or censured), we cannot present the evidence to the contrary.
On the surface, I *do* agree with Randy's decision to not let the forums dissolve into heavy discussion about why certain moderation decisions took place - it detracts from the discussion of travel and miles (i.e. why we are here and why this board exists) and it also violates the TOS in potentially allowing personal attacks on a member (since I will say that a good number of moderation decisions that *I've* been involved in have involved this part of the TOS and by showing reason, we'd be posting that all over again rather than preventing it).
I know Randy reads these threads - as Jenbel suggests, this often becomes an election issue when it very well may (and I say "may" because while the moderators have been told that moderation is off-limits to TalkBoard, its suggested by former TalkBoard member Dovster that this is NOT the case) NOT be a relevent point - and so I hope that Randy might weigh in authoritatively on this issue so that members are not mislead in their voting to believe that electing individuals to TalkBoard can change practices/policies that Randy has put in place and upheld over time.
And if our collective assumption as moderators is incorrect and TalkBoard indeed has some ability to take up moderation as an issue, I think many of us would be interested as well as it certainly changes the job description of TalkBoard as I know at least a few candidates understood it.
#21
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,927
To be clear, Randy has said many times that he considers himself to be the protector of the moderators. He does not want TalkBoard supervising the moderators nor having them fall under TalkBoard's authority.
I am not 100% happy with that (although to a great degree I am) but that does not impact on TalkBoard's authority to set policies by which moderators must work.
TechGirl, you said it yourself: "The moderators (TalkTeam) aren't there to create the structure but to make sure that it is enforced according to the Constitution (Terms of Service) and in line with what the TalkBoard intended. Whereas the moderators should act in accordance with previously decided policies and procedures - the TalkBoard and House of Miles both decide when those policies and procedures should change."
I am saying nothing more than you are. TalkBoard should set the policies, moderators should enforce them.
Obviously, if TalkBoard is going to set these policies than ordinary FlyerTalk members should be free to make suggestions to TalkBoard -- and that should be allowed on TalkBoard Topics.
I am not 100% happy with that (although to a great degree I am) but that does not impact on TalkBoard's authority to set policies by which moderators must work.
TechGirl, you said it yourself: "The moderators (TalkTeam) aren't there to create the structure but to make sure that it is enforced according to the Constitution (Terms of Service) and in line with what the TalkBoard intended. Whereas the moderators should act in accordance with previously decided policies and procedures - the TalkBoard and House of Miles both decide when those policies and procedures should change."
I am saying nothing more than you are. TalkBoard should set the policies, moderators should enforce them.
Obviously, if TalkBoard is going to set these policies than ordinary FlyerTalk members should be free to make suggestions to TalkBoard -- and that should be allowed on TalkBoard Topics.
#22
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,927
Originally Posted by Jenbel
Your examples are pretty tenuous really and nibble at the edges of moderator policy, where it interfaces with other aspects of the board running which are within TB remit. For example - the sigs - my understanding was that mods didn't want to police those, as they were considered far too subjective to be able to get any consistency on. Or at least that's what some of the mods themselves said in discussion about it!
I hereby authorize either WHarvey or Spiff to read what I find in the debate on the private forum and to repost it here to confirm whether or not I am telling the truth.
I was the first to say that only Randy should be able to rule on signatures. I said that moderators should refer questionable ones to him.
I pointed out that signatures remain the same no matter what forum you are posting in and it would be a ridiculous situation if someone were to post in ten forums, find no objection from their moderators, and then get suspended because the identical signature appeared in an 11th forum where the moderator did not like it.
Did most moderators feel the same way? I don't know. I would hope so, but it was not a particular concern to me. The majority of TalkBoard did agree with that and thus it was passed.
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Worth TX
Programs: Earned status with AA, DL, SPG, HH, Hyatt, Marriott, Seabourn, NCL, National, Hertz...I miss my bed!
Posts: 10,927
Originally Posted by Dovster
I was the first to say that only Randy should be able to rule on signatures. I said that moderators should refer questionable ones to him.
I pointed out that signatures remain the same no matter what forum you are posting in and it would be a ridiculous situation if someone were to post in ten forums, find no objection from their moderators, and then get suspended because the identical signature appeared in an 11th forum where the moderator did not like it.
Did most moderators feel the same way? I don't know. I would hope so, but it was not a particular concern to me. The majority of TalkBoard did agree with that and thus it was passed.
I pointed out that signatures remain the same no matter what forum you are posting in and it would be a ridiculous situation if someone were to post in ten forums, find no objection from their moderators, and then get suspended because the identical signature appeared in an 11th forum where the moderator did not like it.
Did most moderators feel the same way? I don't know. I would hope so, but it was not a particular concern to me. The majority of TalkBoard did agree with that and thus it was passed.
#24
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: back to my roots in Scotland!
Programs: Tamsin - what else is there to say?
Posts: 47,843
Originally Posted by Dovster
Jenbel, I don't know what access you do or don't have to moderator discussions (which are supposed to be kept secret but, as we all know, often are not). I do not know what they discussed about signatures. I do know what was discussed in TalkBoard.
Of course, I could even have my timeline wrong, and this could have even come from an earlier discussion on signatures. It certainly was from a while back.
#25
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: UA & IHG Plat, SWAlist, Frontier 100k, Marriott Titan, IHG-Hilton-Hyatt-Wynd Gold, Nat EE, Hertz PC
Posts: 445
Moderators are helping to maintain FlyerTalks communications on a daily level, that TalkBoard members are there to give a guiding hand on a global level that is looking towards the longterm. I do not think the two should be a odds, they are working towards the same goals through different avenues.
I feel that Moderators are more significant on the individuals level, and that TalkBoard members are mode significant on the grand scale of FlyerTalk as a whole.
I feel that Moderators are more significant on the individuals level, and that TalkBoard members are mode significant on the grand scale of FlyerTalk as a whole.