Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Support&Services > Suggestions
Reload this Page >

Speeding up this slug

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Speeding up this slug

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 22, 2001 | 4:13 am
  #1  
Original Poster
40 Countries Visited
2M
60 Nights
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Programs: IHG Diamond, HH Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 4,343
Speeding up this slug

Some of the big pages on this board take ages to load. Most of the reason for this is the enormous number of explicit font changes that occur all over the place.

It would be great if we could strip out, or at least shorten, all these font changes. They take up about half of some pages, and it would therefore make navigation about twice as fast without them.
Kremmen is offline  
Old Feb 22, 2001 | 1:50 pm
  #2  
Original Member
40 Nights
50 Countries Visited
3M
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: The shape-shifting urban sprawl that is El Lay. FT member #71.
Programs: UA Gold & MM; DL & AA credit card dirt status; Hilton Diamond; Marriott Fool's Gold
Posts: 4,837
Curious what kind of connection speed you are running. At work (about 150k) large and small pages load verrrrry fast.
Craig6z is offline  
Old Feb 22, 2001 | 2:15 pm
  #3  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: CH-3823 Wengen Switzerland
Programs: miles&more, MileagePlus
Posts: 27,043
for months now, FlyerTalk-board-loading-speed is no longer a problem for me, and I use a ISDN connection at work, a TV cable - ethernet connection at home and 'only' a 56 tf connection in Wengen.
Rudi is offline  
Old Feb 22, 2001 | 3:00 pm
  #4  
EPS
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1P; HHonors Silver
Posts: 2,686
"Font changes" aren't the problem. Nor is connection speed (unless you're paying a couple of dollars a minute to use one of those inflight telephones for your data connection).


EPS is offline  
Old Feb 22, 2001 | 5:06 pm
  #5  
Founder of FlyerTalk
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 6,540
lately we've been hitting "duress" on this server again, meaning that at times there's a whole lot of activity going on. Our CTO has been monitoring this and has come to the conclusion that if we can hold out for another few weeks, up to a month, then we'll have moved to our new chat technology which is far more robust than this and speed should be OK then. The problem is actually in the way that the 'search' engine performs on this one. in the future, the new search engine will be much faster and not a drain on the entire system....thanks for holding on for us, this thing is really, really growing and remember, the number of posts is actually a very small part of total activity - there is a world of lurkers wating to make their first comments.
Randy Petersen is offline  
Old Feb 23, 2001 | 1:50 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Nights
3M
100 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,351

I am techno illiterate, but I noticed a reaaaaaalllll long current thread on the UA boards that is now 16 pages of over 500 posts long went pretty weird at about the 500 post mark. REAL slow to load and post to.

Lots of experienced folks with multi posts on last page or two. Even Rudi despite comment above has 4 (unedited!) identical posts over 14 minutes on page 15, which was at about the 500 mark, so it is catching out many users.

Is "500" posts a point that UBB goes into melt-down for any single thread? There must have been so few (if any?) over the years it proably has not mattered before?

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/Forum50/HTML/004763.html

------------------
~ Glen ~
ozstamps is offline  
Old Feb 23, 2001 | 6:46 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 15,788
I haven't noticed any problems except when the &^$*&^*&^%* ad-server takes a long time to respond.
birdstrike is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2001 | 5:17 am
  #8  
Original Poster
40 Countries Visited
2M
60 Nights
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Programs: IHG Diamond, HH Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 4,343
Originally posted by Craig6z:
Curious what kind of connection speed you are running. At work (about 150k) large and small pages load verrrrry fast.
56kbps modem. But there are still a lot of people who only have 28.8k or 33.6k modems.

The font changing code alone takes up almost 1/2 the size of the big index pages. Cutting a 100kB page to under 60kB will reduce its loading time from roughly (depending of the effect of compression) 20 secs to around 12 sec on a 33.6 connection, as well as taking lots of comms load off the server.
Kremmen is offline  
Old Feb 27, 2001 | 7:25 am
  #9  
EPS
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1P; HHonors Silver
Posts: 2,686
V.42bis compression is extremely effective on repetitious text (and smart enough to back off when it's not advantageous). You're really barking up the wrong tree on this one.
EPS is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.