Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > Star Alliance
Reload this Page >

Updates on lower baggage weights by partners.

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Updates on lower baggage weights by partners.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 9:21 am
  #16  
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CGN
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold, BA, LH, UA, HH Diamond, Bonvoy Gold, Amex Business Platinum
Posts: 459
Originally Posted by RichardMEL
(just looking at the last e-ticket I have it has 32K on it)?
Interesting. I have never seen a ticket with 32K. Usually it's 20K, 30K, or 40K for weight concept flights and PC for piece concept flights. That's what makes us TAs mad: our computer systems can't distinguish between PC = 2 x 32K and PC = 2 x 23K. I never know what to tell my clients when they ask me that question. How could I possibly fit all the info into my head which airline changes their concept on which date? Good to have this thread at hand, then.
jreichel is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 9:07 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP, UA, AC, Velocity
Posts: 52
Originally Posted by RichardMEL
Seems to me NZ should have waived the fee for a journey already started if the rule change was so quick. It seems fairly unreasonable that if the OP was on x segments just days/weeks before and a new rule comes in that they should pay since there was no reasonable way they could have known of the change (if, on the other hand, the journey was just starting, that's another issue as the pax could possibly have been alerted by their t/a or booking airline regarding the change). Anyway if the ticket has a baggage limit listed on it, shouldn't that apply since that's what they bought with their hard earned (just looking at the last e-ticket I have it has 32K on it)?

just a thought
Good point re what is stated on the ticket! I just checked and the ticket did say 20kg - so I guess the statement by NZ that I had been "lucky" on the previous segments was accurate.
alto25 is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 1:49 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Programs: QF Platinum One (LTG), UA Plat IHG Plat
Posts: 5,836
I should note my tix was a D class fare....
RichardMEL is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 9:39 am
  #19  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: LH SEN, SPG Gold(SCI Gold), Hyatt Diamond, Hilton Gold
Posts: 5,482
I can confirm, that NZ is VERY strict nowadays. We had 57kg as two *G and she recalculated it three times to be sure we are fine.
peter42 is offline  
Old May 30, 2009 | 3:55 am
  #20  
500k
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: (SJC)
Posts: 2,364
Can we update this thread?
AMRivlin is offline  
Old May 30, 2009 | 3:48 pm
  #21  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 2,337
Originally Posted by AMRivlin
Can we update this thread?
Well, for RTW fares it's now in the rules - 2PC applies with most Star carriers allowing 23KG max per piece - for Y cabin travel.
Al B is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.