Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > Star Alliance
Reload this Page >

LX A330 or AC 787 in J for sleeping?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

LX A330 or AC 787 in J for sleeping?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2017, 10:50 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PIT
Programs: OZ Diamond, UA Gold
Posts: 9,970
LX A330 or AC 787 in J for sleeping?

Flying NYC-MXP, the cheapest options for me are AC 787 or LX A330. Not really concerned about food since I know both are shortened services. I have to be well rested so I'm primarily interested in the best sleep and privacy. Both flight times are scheduled as the same, otherwise I'd choose the longer one to get more sleep. Flew LX before, and I enjoyed the flight and the throne seat was comfortable, but I know it's hard to get the throne. Meanwhile I've heard good things about the reverse herringbone pod on AC.

Thoughts?
dinoscool3 is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2017, 10:57 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: YWG
Programs: Free Agent
Posts: 1,483
AC to ensure all aisle access- I don't want to be disturbed when sleeping.
canolakid is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2017, 12:52 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Zurich
Programs: BA GGL, TK*G EL, KL P ELPL, ex AB P, ex LH/LX Sen, HHonors D4L, Bonvoy P
Posts: 1,648
Definitely AC. Apart from direct aisle access also much more space for the feet. On LX foot space is just about enough for size 39 ...
swiss_global is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2017, 10:38 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NRT / HND
Programs: AA EXP, NH Plat, Former UA 1K
Posts: 5,760
I'll echo the same. Most definitely AC for this one. Aside from being a superior seat, also the 787 is very quiet. A330's are quite noisy in the air.
dvs7310 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2017, 12:44 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,339
Although I love LX ... this one goes to AC. Another vote for flying via YYZ
cfischer is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2017, 2:12 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: DXB / KUO
Programs: AY, SQ, EK
Posts: 859
Have only connected int'l - int'l at YYZ once - and it was a real pain. This was UA to BR late in the evening BTW.

Had to go through immigration (i.e. enter Canada), landside and again through security. Is this the standard approach in Canada?

I think both options are fine. LX J is perfectly fine if you get one of those individual J seats. Or at least I've picked those seats on the A340-300 in the past.

Of course AC J is ok too.
nanyang is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2017, 8:08 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NRT / HND
Programs: AA EXP, NH Plat, Former UA 1K
Posts: 5,760
Originally Posted by nanyang
Have only connected int'l - int'l at YYZ once - and it was a real pain. This was UA to BR late in the evening BTW.

Had to go through immigration (i.e. enter Canada), landside and again through security. Is this the standard approach in Canada?

I think both options are fine. LX J is perfectly fine if you get one of those individual J seats. Or at least I've picked those seats on the A340-300 in the past.

Of course AC J is ok too.
Canada has INT-INT transfer, how long ago was that when you were there?
dvs7310 is offline  
Old Jun 11, 2017, 11:36 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: DXB / KUO
Programs: AY, SQ, EK
Posts: 859
Originally Posted by dvs7310
Canada has INT-INT transfer, how long ago was that when you were there?
2-3 years ago. EWR-YYZ-TPE.
nanyang is offline  
Old Jun 12, 2017, 5:54 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,233
I've flown four times now on AC 788 or 789 in J and have never managed to get any sleep. I found the seats uncomfortable and very constricting, both for the shoulders and the feet. Also, it seemed rather hard. So my vote would go for LX.
lhrsfo is offline  
Old Jun 12, 2017, 11:43 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: AC MM E50 , Former SPG, now Marriott LT Plat
Posts: 6,282
Originally Posted by nanyang
2-3 years ago. EWR-YYZ-TPE.
This was probably when BR was in T3. They are now in TI, making
UA/AC transfers to BR much easier.
IluvSQ is offline  
Old Jun 12, 2017, 2:05 pm
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,681
Originally Posted by dinoscool3
Both flight times are scheduled as the same, otherwise I'd choose the longer one to get more sleep.
I was surprised to read this, but indeed YYZ-MXP and JFK-ZRH are both blocked at 7:50.

That said, I'd generally rather do my connection at the front end (i.e., YYZ, rather than ZRH), particularly with that last segment being in "Euro-Business."
Kacee is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.