Community
Wiki Posts
Search

LH C - expectations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 7:33 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YYZ, ON
Programs: UA 1K (2MM)
Posts: 394
LH C - expectations

Hi All,

My wife and I are flying YYZ-HKG this December. She will be flying on an award C ticket YYZ-FRA-HKG and return January reverse route.

I've never flown LH (any class). I've read up on various threads on LH but get mixed feelings. Just wanted to tell my wife what to expect. Comparisons to UA C (transatlatic) would be most welcome as I have some experience with that.

Cheers!
SLC-YYZ is offline  
Old Sep 11, 2003 | 9:21 pm
  #2  
Moderator, Argentina and FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: MIA / EZE
Programs: Lord of Malbec & all Wines Argentine. AA EXP / Marriott Lifetime Gold / Hyatt Explorist / Hertz PC
Posts: 36,210
Keep your expectations in check. LH's Business Class product is its current Achilles Heel. Of course, if you benchmark it against UA's C, then LH will seem like heaven. Enjoy your flight.
Gaucho100K is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 1:58 am
  #3  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: CH-3823 Wengen Switzerland
Programs: miles&more, MileagePlus
Posts: 27,043
seats (space) in C is a little bit less comfortable (compared to UA). LH C will introduce 100% flat C seats in the next 12 months (probably not as early as this ded/jan on your flight segments).

Food (for my European taste) and consistency of good (very frequent) personal service is better.
Rudi is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 2:51 am
  #4  
GK
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Programs: reformed ex basic Member
Posts: 3,148
I have LH C coming up this month going to BOM, then back from SIN, so shall share details. It is far better than TG correct ?
GK is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 3:53 am
  #5  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: CH-3823 Wengen Switzerland
Programs: miles&more, MileagePlus
Posts: 27,043
far better then TG?

it depends on your personal preferences.

Flying into Thailand I prefer TG: nothing (for me) beats the Thai smiles and adds to my joy of going there once more. Also, if you prefer Asian (Thai) food, you will be better served in TG.

Flying out of Thailand (red eye): I prefer LH C.
Rudi is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 4:36 am
  #6  
Original Member
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: CH-3823 Wengen Switzerland
Programs: miles&more, MileagePlus
Posts: 27,043
then back from SIN

I would prefer SQ business (to LH or TG).
Rudi is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 4:39 am
  #7  
GK
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Programs: reformed ex basic Member
Posts: 3,148
I know, back from SIN via FRA is on LH.. would rather go SQ but the fare is so so much cheaper on LH and company won't pay anymore. Shame.
GK is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 11:14 am
  #8  
50 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CH, D, USA
Posts: 1,801
Just go for the code-share! I once got an incredibly low f-fare ex cairo on an SQ operated LH flight.
f4free is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 5:40 pm
  #9  
Moderator, Argentina and FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: MIA / EZE
Programs: Lord of Malbec & all Wines Argentine. AA EXP / Marriott Lifetime Gold / Hyatt Explorist / Hertz PC
Posts: 36,210
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Rudi:
Flying into Thailand I prefer TG: nothing (for me) beats the Thai smiles and adds to my joy of going there once more. Also, if you prefer Asian (Thai) food, you will be better served in TG.
</font>
Rudi makes a great point about the great attitude on TG premium classes, unfortunately the very dated 744s that they have make things much less comfortable than what other carriers have to offer - this is why when I have an option (especially long haul), TG is not my first choice.
Gaucho100K is offline  
Old Sep 12, 2003 | 8:58 pm
  #10  
Original Poster
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YYZ, ON
Programs: UA 1K (2MM)
Posts: 394
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Gaucho100K:
Rudi makes a great point about the great attitude on TG premium classes, unfortunately the very dated 744s that they have make things much less comfortable than what other carriers have to offer - this is why when I have an option (especially long haul), TG is not my first choice.</font>
Thanks for all the feedback on LH C.

My wife will give an interesting perspective as she only flys 2-3x a year and so far has been in coach only. She flew YYZ-NRT-SIN in coach AC and UA last fall. I am going the other direction so will not be able to experience LH C myself (UA over the Pacific).

SLC-YYZ is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.