Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > Star Alliance
Reload this Page >

Baggage Policy on Swiss/UA Code Share

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Baggage Policy on Swiss/UA Code Share

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 20, 2014 | 8:25 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Unhappy Baggage Policy on Swiss/UA Code Share

Hi All,

I have spent a good part of the day on the United/Swiss/Star Alliance sites and the rest of it on the phone with agents trying to figure out what baggage policy would apply to my itinerary.

I am flying ORD-ZRH-DEL in November and I am a 1K/*G member. All ticket numbers (4PAX) start in 016 and the flights are all Operated by Swiss. Here are the flight numbers on the reservation

ORD-ZRH -> UA7681
ZRH-DEL -> LX146
DEL-ZRH -> LX147
ZRH-ORD -> UA7681

My question is simple, what baggage allowance would apply? When I check with Swiss in March, they said that United's policy would apply but now that I am 1K and I checked with United Premier Line they are saying the *G additional baggage benefit would apply.

Any insight here would be helpful. I am hoping for United 1K baggage policy applying since that is the most generous from my research.
hewsux is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2014 | 10:58 pm
  #2  
20 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NRT / HND
Programs: AA EXP, A3 Gold, Former UA 1K
Posts: 6,366
In general it's the marketing carrier for the first segment, so UA in your case... but they don't have to include anything that would be included as extra for status if you were flying on that marketing carrier's metal (the *A extra bag). Ultimately it's going to be up to the check in agent. I've had it go both ways, though the time they tried to deny it it didn't matter. The way they were talking, a supervisor could have overridden the computer, but since I had a companion with me who was only using 1 bag from her allowance we just shifted my extra to hers.
dvs7310 is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2014 | 11:09 pm
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AA EXP; UA 1MM & PP; Marriott AMB; Hyatt Globalist; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 62,368
Originally Posted by dvs7310
Ultimately it's going to be up to the check in agent.
This is the best answer. The rules are extremely unclear and ultimately, contradictory.

What does your ticket say?
Kacee is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 12:46 am
  #4  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Auckland
Programs: NZ Elite, MH Platinum, IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 937
Provided all flights are on the one ticket, UA rules apply for the whole itinerary.

US DOT requires that the baggage allowance for ex-US itineraries is whatever the allowance is of the first "marketing carrier."

If OP was booked as ORD-(LX)-ZRH then LX allowance applies. If it was EWR-(UA)-ORD-(LX)-ZRH then UA international allowance applies.
LyingFlat is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 6:20 am
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Originally Posted by Kacee
This is the best answer. The rules are extremely unclear and ultimately, contradictory.

What does your ticket say?
When the ticket was booked I did not have status high enough so ticket says 1 Bag per passenger.
hewsux is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 6:21 am
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Originally Posted by LyingFlat
Provided all flights are on the one ticket, UA rules apply for the whole itinerary.

US DOT requires that the baggage allowance for ex-US itineraries is whatever the allowance is of the first "marketing carrier."

If OP was booked as ORD-(LX)-ZRH then LX allowance applies. If it was EWR-(UA)-ORD-(LX)-ZRH then UA international allowance applies.
So given the flight codes I posted, who is the marketing carrier? My understanding is that since the ticket is beginning in 016 and the first leg is on a UA flight code, the marketing carrier is United but I am unclear.
hewsux is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 7:10 am
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,253
The marketing carrier is UA. It's UA ticket stock on a UA flight number. That is true even if another carrier operates the aircraft. Thus, the UA allowance will apply to all segments of the ticket, both outbound to DEL and on the way back to ORD.

OP's separate problem is the the baggage allowance on his e-ticket is established as of the date the ticket was issued. If his status has "increased" since that date, he should reprint his e-ticket receipt and see if the allowance has caught up with the change. If it has not, he should get that fixed now, not at the airport.

For *A, the agent will see a baggage allowance as specified on the e-ticket receipt. That will same time fighting at ORD (where it may eventually get fixed) and with LX at DEL (where it will be futile to argue).
Often1 is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 7:50 am
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Originally Posted by Often1
If his status has "increased" since that date, he should reprint his e-ticket receipt and see if the allowance has caught up with the change. If it has not, he should get that fixed now, not at the airport.
The receipt on United.com still shows 1Bag/50lbs each. What is the best way to get this updated? Premier Line?
hewsux is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 9:11 am
  #9  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AA EXP; UA 1MM & PP; Marriott AMB; Hyatt Globalist; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 62,368
Originally Posted by Often1
The marketing carrier is UA. It's UA ticket stock on a UA flight number. That is true even if another carrier operates the aircraft. Thus, the UA allowance will apply to all segments of the ticket, both outbound to DEL and on the way back to ORD.
That is not completely correct. IATA Resolution 302 goes on to state that "In case of code share flights [Marketing Carrier] will be the Operating Carrier, unless that carrier publishes a rule stipulating that it will be the Marketing Carrier."

That's why I say the rule is ultimately contradictory, and basically allows the marketing carrier to do whatever it likes.

OP, I would count on two bags at 23kg each (economy allowance + *G allowance). Anything beyond that there's a good chance they will charge you for it.
Kacee is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 10:11 am
  #10  
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: DL PM; Hilton Dia; Marriott Titanium/LT Gold
Posts: 8,517
Baggage Policy on Swiss/UA Code Share

I think the answer the OP is looking for that no one is giving:
what it actually says on your reservation online is not what matters. that says the standard baggage allowance, it would never show the extra baggage you get with status. There is no need to call to get it changed, as there is nothing to change. If for some reason they try to charge you for the second bag (though the computer will likely recognize you dont have to at checkin), just speak up.
Adam1222 is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 1:13 pm
  #11  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Originally Posted by Kacee
OP, I would count on two bags at 23kg each (economy allowance + *G allowance). Anything beyond that there's a good chance they will charge you for it.
Thanks, I called United back and they specifically notated the account for 2 complementary bags per passenger. I am on the phone with the travel agency right now to try and have them address the issue where the receipt does not reflect the MP number.
hewsux is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 1:17 pm
  #12  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: OZ *G; HH Diamond;
Posts: 1,676
Originally Posted by hewsux
Originally Posted by Kacee
OP, I would count on two bags at 23kg each (economy allowance + *G allowance). Anything beyond that there's a good chance they will charge you for it.
Thanks, I called United back and they specifically notated the account for 2 complementary bags per passenger. I am on the phone with the travel agency right now to try and have them address the issue where the receipt does not reflect the MP number.
First of all, I do not understand on what basis, UA agent is notating the PNR with 2 free bags (per passenger no less).
UA's baggage rules for the route: (a) no-status is 1 bag at 23kg; (b) 1K is 3 bags at 32kg.

This itin is subject to DoT rules. DoT rules say the marketing carrier rules apply. We do not know whether they speak of (a) or (b). I would lean towards to (a), i.e., the basic rule.

Swiss rule is: (c) no-status is 1 bag at 23kg; (d) *G is 2 bags at 23kg.

So the question for OP is what exactly the end result OP wants to achieve. It may just be huge efforts for nothing.

Last edited by geclub1; Aug 21, 2014 at 1:35 pm
geclub1 is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 1:17 pm
  #13  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Originally Posted by Adam1222
I think the answer the OP is looking for that no one is giving:
what it actually says on your reservation online is not what matters. that says the standard baggage allowance, it would never show the extra baggage you get with status. There is no need to call to get it changed, as there is nothing to change. If for some reason they try to charge you for the second bag (though the computer will likely recognize you dont have to at checkin), just speak up.
The agent I spoke to said that in case I was still charged in error on checkin, I should save the receipts and have United refund me the excess baggage fee. I am hoping to not go down that route hence doing all the leg work a few months before the actual date of travel.

Also, I had another UA reservation (domestic) which did reflect the 1K baggage benefits minutes after I added the MP number on there. The big differences between the flights are:
1. Domestic UA only vs International code share
2. Online Receipt shows the MP number for domestic vs. no MP number on the international flight.
hewsux is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 1:19 pm
  #14  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
Originally Posted by geclub1
Mark it for follow-up.
I am sorry, but I am do not follow a 100%. Should I follow up with United at a later point of time or should I be asking the airline and/or the travel agent to mark it for follow-up?
hewsux is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 1:52 pm
  #15  
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: OZ *G; HH Diamond;
Posts: 1,676
Originally Posted by hewsux
I am sorry, but I am do not follow a 100%. Should I follow up with United at a later point of time or should I be asking the airline and/or the travel agent to mark it for follow-up?
That was a mark for myself to follow up. I have updated my OP to add more comments.
geclub1 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.