Greenville/Spartanburg Potential for SWA?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: SWA RR, CO One Pass, TAM Fidelidade, HA Miles, DL Skymiles, KLM Flying Blue
Posts: 1,165
Greenville/Spartanburg Potential for SWA?
Could Greenville/Spartanburg be one of Southwest next destinations?
http://www.greenvilleonline.com/arti...NTPAGECAROUSEL
http://www.greenvilleonline.com/arti...NTPAGECAROUSEL
#2
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: PVD
Programs: Rapid Rewards, WorldPerks
Posts: 465
I think there could be some potentail. The airport might seem a bit small for WN these days, but I wonder how much of their annual pax count is depressed thanks to the relative closeness of CLT.
If this was WN a few years ago, I would say it might happen. But lately WN doesn't seem to be afraid of going right into big markets.
But who knows, I can't imagine the other carriers would put a huge fight if WN came.
If this was WN a few years ago, I would say it might happen. But lately WN doesn't seem to be afraid of going right into big markets.
But who knows, I can't imagine the other carriers would put a huge fight if WN came.
#3
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 736
I've always thought this would be a good way for WN to grow in the Southeast, but as has been stated - the "we're an alternate to the ATL market" for folks in metro atlanta is not how WN is going these days (they aren't skybus) - that being said, Atlanta keeps growing on the far North suburbs where 1.5 hrs to greenville may make more sense than 1 hr plus threat of Traffic to ATL. However, loyalties to DL and AT would be a problem. Also, SC keeps growing as well too and has major employers, like BMW.
#4
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma
Programs: DL Gold, UA Ag Muti-year WN Companion Pass, A+, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat Ntl EmExElite
Posts: 941
I could be wrong, but other than Alligant, isn't GSP only regional jets now?
If so, Southwest would be adding significant capacity at a time when demand is low.
However they could probably do a flight to Orlando and Tampa to take care of Alligant. Add Chicago, Baltimore and Dallas or Houston to take care of the business traveller. With American cutting 10% on August 1, they probably are looking for any signs of increased demand for seats so they can pounce.
The last time I was in GSP there were not a lot of options for me to fly home in the evening. US Air doesn't fly to my home city so this posed a problem. Several of the people I was working with drove to Atlanta rather than deal with the limited schedule, so the lower volume out of GSP could be a schedule and fare issue more than anything else.
If so, Southwest would be adding significant capacity at a time when demand is low.
However they could probably do a flight to Orlando and Tampa to take care of Alligant. Add Chicago, Baltimore and Dallas or Houston to take care of the business traveller. With American cutting 10% on August 1, they probably are looking for any signs of increased demand for seats so they can pounce.
The last time I was in GSP there were not a lot of options for me to fly home in the evening. US Air doesn't fly to my home city so this posed a problem. Several of the people I was working with drove to Atlanta rather than deal with the limited schedule, so the lower volume out of GSP could be a schedule and fare issue more than anything else.
#5
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 108
I could be wrong, but other than Alligant, isn't GSP only regional jets now?
If so, Southwest would be adding significant capacity at a time when demand is low.
However they could probably do a flight to Orlando and Tampa to take care of Alligant. Add Chicago, Baltimore and Dallas or Houston to take care of the business traveller. With American cutting 10% on August 1, they probably are looking for any signs of increased demand for seats so they can pounce.
The last time I was in GSP there were not a lot of options for me to fly home in the evening. US Air doesn't fly to my home city so this posed a problem. Several of the people I was working with drove to Atlanta rather than deal with the limited schedule, so the lower volume out of GSP could be a schedule and fare issue more than anything else.
If so, Southwest would be adding significant capacity at a time when demand is low.
However they could probably do a flight to Orlando and Tampa to take care of Alligant. Add Chicago, Baltimore and Dallas or Houston to take care of the business traveller. With American cutting 10% on August 1, they probably are looking for any signs of increased demand for seats so they can pounce.
The last time I was in GSP there were not a lot of options for me to fly home in the evening. US Air doesn't fly to my home city so this posed a problem. Several of the people I was working with drove to Atlanta rather than deal with the limited schedule, so the lower volume out of GSP could be a schedule and fare issue more than anything else.
#6
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: OH & NV
Programs: AA Lifetime Plat, WN CP, Latin Pass Bonus
Posts: 3,707
I would guess WN needs a certain number of flights so as to properly utilize their ground staff. I don't think they "outsource" ground service anywhere.
What is the station with the fewest number of flights?
I know AA "Express" flys a wierd schedule to Champaign, IL. About 3 flights arrive in the evening and then depart the next morning withing 3 hours. Probably due to overnight parking and closeness to Chicago hub.
What is the station with the fewest number of flights?
I know AA "Express" flys a wierd schedule to Champaign, IL. About 3 flights arrive in the evening and then depart the next morning withing 3 hours. Probably due to overnight parking and closeness to Chicago hub.
#7
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 108
I would guess WN needs a certain number of flights so as to properly utilize their ground staff. I don't think they "outsource" ground service anywhere.
What is the station with the fewest number of flights?
I know AA "Express" flys a wierd schedule to Champaign, IL. About 3 flights arrive in the evening and then depart the next morning withing 3 hours. Probably due to overnight parking and closeness to Chicago hub.
What is the station with the fewest number of flights?
I know AA "Express" flys a wierd schedule to Champaign, IL. About 3 flights arrive in the evening and then depart the next morning withing 3 hours. Probably due to overnight parking and closeness to Chicago hub.
#8
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Programs: HH Gold; AA AAdvantage Mbr; DL Skymiles Silver Medallion; World of Hyatt Mbr; NK Free Spirit Mbr
Posts: 2,531
Add to that, the fact that there is lots of business travel to/from GSP, and that this area hasn't been hit as hard in the recession as most others, and I think GSP would be a slam-dunk for WN.
Last edited by gsupstate; Jun 15, 2009 at 6:10 am
#10
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Programs: HH Gold; AA AAdvantage Mbr; DL Skymiles Silver Medallion; World of Hyatt Mbr; NK Free Spirit Mbr
Posts: 2,531
Lower cost of operation, greater market share, less competition, etc, etc, etc... Plus they can still pull from those larger markets easily from GSP.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
Those are the same arguments used for service in Manchester and Providence. Within eighteen months BOS will have 2X the WN service MHT or PVD ever had. Operationally (due to size) and strategically (look at the cities added in the last four years) WN has outgrown small markets like GSP - smaller in passenger numbers than Wichita, and Wichita isn't described as the great gateway to MCI.
#12
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Programs: HH Gold; AA AAdvantage Mbr; DL Skymiles Silver Medallion; World of Hyatt Mbr; NK Free Spirit Mbr
Posts: 2,531
Those are the same arguments used for service in Manchester and Providence. Within eighteen months BOS will have 2X the WN service MHT or PVD ever had. Operationally (due to size) and strategically (look at the cities added in the last four years) WN has outgrown small markets like GSP - smaller in passenger numbers than Wichita, and Wichita isn't described as the great gateway to MCI.
Last edited by gsupstate; Jun 17, 2009 at 6:16 am
#14
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Programs: HH Gold; AA AAdvantage Mbr; DL Skymiles Silver Medallion; World of Hyatt Mbr; NK Free Spirit Mbr
Posts: 2,531
The question is, "is there $$ to be made?" The answer is yes - WN can be the catalyst that brings back the 55% of would-be GSP travelers that drive to other airports because of fares. They'd very likely also attract others to fly who wouldn't have considered flying at all, another market segment.
Last edited by gsupstate; Jun 17, 2009 at 6:14 am
#15
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 108
What change in GSP in last 4 years. After ATS codeshare southwest just going to former ATA airports. Exept IAD and MKE. But what i read they went to IAD after FlyI stop flying. And MKE becase of Midwest droping to many flighs or maybe Delta/Northwest merger and Mke was Northwest hub or focus City. I must be mad but i think EWR be next. Southwest can get non-stops to 8-12 citys whith 20-30 flights. SRQ and PIE can get 7-10 flights each?
SRQ-BWI SRQ-MDW SRQ-MCO 8-10 flights. PIE-BWI PIE-MDW PIE-FLL 7+
Flights. And DCA and DFW be last to copletle replace ATA codeshare.
Since they comeback to SFO They might comeack to IAH. Than DFW IAH will get flight to 6 airports each LAS MDW BWI MCO LAX(or PHX) and DFW-HOU IAH-DAL.
SRQ-BWI SRQ-MDW SRQ-MCO 8-10 flights. PIE-BWI PIE-MDW PIE-FLL 7+
Flights. And DCA and DFW be last to copletle replace ATA codeshare.
Since they comeback to SFO They might comeack to IAH. Than DFW IAH will get flight to 6 airports each LAS MDW BWI MCO LAX(or PHX) and DFW-HOU IAH-DAL.