Crackdown on Ebay Rapid Rewards Voucher Sales????
#16
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
Originally Posted by gregorygrady
Smart Ebayers will just list the award tix differently to get around whatever rules Ebay/SWA institutes.
ebay will only want to shut down RR auctions if SWA has a solid lawsuit, whether threatened or actual. Only one thing counts for ebay: money.
#18
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 6,359
Originally Posted by nsx
If ebay really wants to prohibit RR auctions, they certainly can. After all, if you can search and find them, so can ebay.
Originally Posted by nsx
ebay will only want to shut down RR auctions if SWA has a solid lawsuit, whether threatened or actual. Only one thing counts for ebay: money.
#19
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
Originally Posted by WN LUVS U
I can't got into specifics, but a search would reveal my words of caution several weeks ago. There is a BIG effort to put a stop to the resale of award tickets.
Because of its lack of capacity controls, SWA has a much bigger reason to curtail sale of awards than other airlines. I'll say it again: ebay sales are the enemy of a generous RR program.
#21
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
Originally Posted by ByrdluvsAWACO
What's the purpose of WN lifetime credit totals?
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 15,721
I'm surprised this didn't happen a few years ago.
Most of the legacy carriers, particularly DL, have been quite vigilant about shutting down auctions. And ebay seems more than happy to comply even though the auctions do not violate any listing rules. (Ebay claims that the listings violate its ubiquitous "intellectual property and trademark violation" policy, but come on, there is a big difference between selling a pirated copy of windows and a voucher that was earned by foregoing a cash rebate on your visa or buy spending $$ to fly). Anyway, the upshot is that Ebay does not find it profitable to argue about such things, much less risk litigation, so it will just shut them down.
Will this stop people from selling awards? Hardly. It simply means that they will go back to the old system of using coupon brokers, which means that the sellers will receive less $$ and the middlemen will get more profit. Or perhaps they will simply list them for sale in other online locations. Ebay is way too efficient!
This is simply my view of ebay - I leave the ethics of FF award sales to others.
Most of the legacy carriers, particularly DL, have been quite vigilant about shutting down auctions. And ebay seems more than happy to comply even though the auctions do not violate any listing rules. (Ebay claims that the listings violate its ubiquitous "intellectual property and trademark violation" policy, but come on, there is a big difference between selling a pirated copy of windows and a voucher that was earned by foregoing a cash rebate on your visa or buy spending $$ to fly). Anyway, the upshot is that Ebay does not find it profitable to argue about such things, much less risk litigation, so it will just shut them down.
Will this stop people from selling awards? Hardly. It simply means that they will go back to the old system of using coupon brokers, which means that the sellers will receive less $$ and the middlemen will get more profit. Or perhaps they will simply list them for sale in other online locations. Ebay is way too efficient!
This is simply my view of ebay - I leave the ethics of FF award sales to others.
#23
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 6,359
Originally Posted by nsx
Nothing more than bragging rights, AFAIK. Maybe it carries some weight when you ask a favor, but SWA doesn't make much of a habit of favoritism toward ultra-frequent customers.
#24
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hoffman Estates IL
Posts: 661
What an interesting and thought-provoking thread this is. Here are my two cents:
The airline has already been compensated for the credits that generate awards. Hertz, Marriott, Nextel, Visa, and all the other partners pay for the credits they give out; and quite obviously, there is direct revenue corresponding to credits given for regular travel.
After passing along an award to a passenger, that gift should not have a bunch of strings associated with it. I think it's rude to give someone a lamp and then tell them what room they have to put it in; likewise, I think it's inappropriate for an airline to micromanage how we use our awards.
(Southwest has been following this polite principle since the inception of The Company Club / Rapid Rewards by allowing us to transfer awards to friends and family without any hassle. In fact, they brag about it on the Rapid Rewards page.)
Thanks to the sensible policy allowing us to transfer awards to our family and friends, the airline can't possibly stop us from selling them to said family and friends. I can't count how many times a brother, cousin, or good friend has called me saying, "I want to go to Las Vegas (or wherever) next weekend; Southwest wants $350 roundtrip -- will you part with a freebie for, say, $200?" Would any executive at Southwest really frown on me for having occasionally answered yes?
If executives would permit us to sell awards to our friends and family (and I think most would), then why not just let us sell them on eBay for whatever the market will bear. They've gotten their money for the awards already. And 14% of them go unused anyway.
Southwest should focus on keeping costs in line, continuing to improve efficiency of aircraft and employees, and getting good fuel hedges beyond 2009. This airline knows how to make money, and they've done it now for 30-something years straight. If a few frequent fliers also make a little money by selling awards that they have worked to earn, then so be it.
Concentrate on what matters, Southwest.
The airline has already been compensated for the credits that generate awards. Hertz, Marriott, Nextel, Visa, and all the other partners pay for the credits they give out; and quite obviously, there is direct revenue corresponding to credits given for regular travel.
After passing along an award to a passenger, that gift should not have a bunch of strings associated with it. I think it's rude to give someone a lamp and then tell them what room they have to put it in; likewise, I think it's inappropriate for an airline to micromanage how we use our awards.
(Southwest has been following this polite principle since the inception of The Company Club / Rapid Rewards by allowing us to transfer awards to friends and family without any hassle. In fact, they brag about it on the Rapid Rewards page.)
Thanks to the sensible policy allowing us to transfer awards to our family and friends, the airline can't possibly stop us from selling them to said family and friends. I can't count how many times a brother, cousin, or good friend has called me saying, "I want to go to Las Vegas (or wherever) next weekend; Southwest wants $350 roundtrip -- will you part with a freebie for, say, $200?" Would any executive at Southwest really frown on me for having occasionally answered yes?
If executives would permit us to sell awards to our friends and family (and I think most would), then why not just let us sell them on eBay for whatever the market will bear. They've gotten their money for the awards already. And 14% of them go unused anyway.
Southwest should focus on keeping costs in line, continuing to improve efficiency of aircraft and employees, and getting good fuel hedges beyond 2009. This airline knows how to make money, and they've done it now for 30-something years straight. If a few frequent fliers also make a little money by selling awards that they have worked to earn, then so be it.
Concentrate on what matters, Southwest.
#25
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: GSP (Greenville, SC)
Programs: DL Gold Medallion; UA Premier Executive; WN sub-CP; AA sub-Gold
Posts: 13,393
Originally Posted by Dan Burgess
What an interesting and thought-provoking thread this is. Here are my two cents:
The airline has already been compensated for the credits that generate awards. Hertz, Marriott, Nextel, Visa, and all the other partners pay for the credits they give out; and quite obviously, there is direct revenue corresponding to credits given for regular travel.
After passing along an award to a passenger, that gift should not have a bunch of strings associated with it. I think it's rude to give someone a lamp and then tell them what room they have to put it in; likewise, I think it's inappropriate for an airline to micromanage how we use our awards.
(Southwest has been following this polite principle since the inception of The Company Club / Rapid Rewards by allowing us to transfer awards to friends and family without any hassle. In fact, they brag about it on the Rapid Rewards page.)
Thanks to the sensible policy allowing us to transfer awards to our family and friends, the airline can't possibly stop us from selling them to said family and friends. I can't count how many times a brother, cousin, or good friend has called me saying, "I want to go to Las Vegas (or wherever) next weekend; Southwest wants $350 roundtrip -- will you part with a freebie for, say, $200?" Would any executive at Southwest really frown on me for having occasionally answered yes?
If executives would permit us to sell awards to our friends and family (and I think most would), then why not just let us sell them on eBay for whatever the market will bear. They've gotten their money for the awards already. And 14% of them go unused anyway.
Southwest should focus on keeping costs in line, continuing to improve efficiency of aircraft and employees, and getting good fuel hedges beyond 2009. This airline knows how to make money, and they've done it now for 30-something years straight. If a few frequent fliers also make a little money by selling awards that they have worked to earn, then so be it.
Concentrate on what matters, Southwest.
The airline has already been compensated for the credits that generate awards. Hertz, Marriott, Nextel, Visa, and all the other partners pay for the credits they give out; and quite obviously, there is direct revenue corresponding to credits given for regular travel.
After passing along an award to a passenger, that gift should not have a bunch of strings associated with it. I think it's rude to give someone a lamp and then tell them what room they have to put it in; likewise, I think it's inappropriate for an airline to micromanage how we use our awards.
(Southwest has been following this polite principle since the inception of The Company Club / Rapid Rewards by allowing us to transfer awards to friends and family without any hassle. In fact, they brag about it on the Rapid Rewards page.)
Thanks to the sensible policy allowing us to transfer awards to our family and friends, the airline can't possibly stop us from selling them to said family and friends. I can't count how many times a brother, cousin, or good friend has called me saying, "I want to go to Las Vegas (or wherever) next weekend; Southwest wants $350 roundtrip -- will you part with a freebie for, say, $200?" Would any executive at Southwest really frown on me for having occasionally answered yes?
If executives would permit us to sell awards to our friends and family (and I think most would), then why not just let us sell them on eBay for whatever the market will bear. They've gotten their money for the awards already. And 14% of them go unused anyway.
Southwest should focus on keeping costs in line, continuing to improve efficiency of aircraft and employees, and getting good fuel hedges beyond 2009. This airline knows how to make money, and they've done it now for 30-something years straight. If a few frequent fliers also make a little money by selling awards that they have worked to earn, then so be it.
Concentrate on what matters, Southwest.
But seriously, the RR tickets are not to be sold. That is part of the product regardless of whether you try to rationalize breaking those rules.
#26
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Home
Posts: 1,910
What people need to understand, the RR Ticket/Award is worth more than $300/RT. With the recent price hike from WN, even a RT x-country or even a SEA - PHX is $168 One Way! Even SEA - LAS is $265 RT today and that is not for weekends, which the lowest price I could find was $296.
My guess is, the real value of the RR ticket is $400 right now for summer travel.
Christian
My guess is, the real value of the RR ticket is $400 right now for summer travel.
Christian
#28
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,624
Originally Posted by cxn
My guess is, the real value of the RR ticket is $400 right now for summer travel.
#29
Join Date: May 2005
Programs: SWA Rapid Rewards
Posts: 14
In your Voucher Notification letter it states that the vouchers are void if sold. None of us argue this point. As stated above SWA points out that you can use these for FRIENDS and family. Would you call me your friend if I gave you $350? Would you feel friendly enough to part with one of your vouchers? I don't see how SWA can smack down us FTers. They don't know that I don't have friends all over the country? SWA needs to be as careful with this as the Ebayers do. If they went and just whacked enough RR accounts someone would get pissed and call a lawyer and have a calss action suit for false advertising. People fly airlines for more reasons than just price.
Just my $.02
Just my $.02
#30
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hoffman Estates IL
Posts: 661
charlieootj makes a great point.
eBay calls itself a "Community", and often participants feel like they are part of a unique group of people. It's not that far of a stretch to consider the buyer of one's item to be a friend within the community.
eBay calls itself a "Community", and often participants feel like they are part of a unique group of people. It's not that far of a stretch to consider the buyer of one's item to be a friend within the community.