Southwest Effect Commercial?
#16
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
+1 to all of that. I think we generally take our own knowledge/expertise with an airline's FFP into account as well. I'm comfortable calling an AA mile 2 cents because I know where I use them for that valuation. I'm not comfortable calling a DL mile 2 cents because I have no idea where I'd use it and I'd have no elite benefits when I did.
I did just commit the wholly un-FT act of buying a Spirit ticket. MCI-DTW, $210 R/T for nonstop and confirmed BFS seating vs. $280-320 connecting on WN, UA, and DL. Very short trip, one where I can live with their underseat backpack rule...the appeal of the nonstop trumped all else.
I did just commit the wholly un-FT act of buying a Spirit ticket. MCI-DTW, $210 R/T for nonstop and confirmed BFS seating vs. $280-320 connecting on WN, UA, and DL. Very short trip, one where I can live with their underseat backpack rule...the appeal of the nonstop trumped all else.
#17
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Diego, Ca
Programs: AA 2MM LT PLT; AS MVP Gold75k; HHonors Diamond; IHG PLT
Posts: 3,503
Doesn't WN management EVER learn? http://www.krmg.com/news/news/local/...tive-ads/nf9hD
WN makes it difficult for consumers to comparison shop http://www.computerworld.com/article...er-orbitz.html subject commercial is an attempt to maintain the former low fare reputation, now more myth than fact, discourage kettles from looking elsewhere.
Why is WN spending marketing $$ to compete with F9 and NK - shouldn't they be focused on the coveted, high margin business traveler?
WN makes it difficult for consumers to comparison shop http://www.computerworld.com/article...er-orbitz.html subject commercial is an attempt to maintain the former low fare reputation, now more myth than fact, discourage kettles from looking elsewhere.
Why is WN spending marketing $$ to compete with F9 and NK - shouldn't they be focused on the coveted, high margin business traveler?
#18
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 52,575
While they should be fined for the false advertising (a major pet peeve of mine with *all* airlines ), I actually kind of understand their business strategy for not distributing their fares to (most) third parties.
I don't necessarily *like* it, but I get how they've managed to reach a powerful enough market position where they don't need to use other firms to market their fares to fill planes. That has value, and they're exploiting it. I don't see that as unfair or anticompetitive in and of itself. (I also think Tesla should be allowed to sell cars without middlemen, but I guess that's for OMNI... )
I don't necessarily *like* it, but I get how they've managed to reach a powerful enough market position where they don't need to use other firms to market their fares to fill planes. That has value, and they're exploiting it. I don't see that as unfair or anticompetitive in and of itself. (I also think Tesla should be allowed to sell cars without middlemen, but I guess that's for OMNI... )
#19
Join Date: Oct 2001
Programs: LTP, PP
Posts: 8,700
In other words, fanboys (like myself in the past), captive markets (myself) and employers that force employees to fly them.
Just my stupid opinion!
#20
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Diego, Ca
Programs: AA 2MM LT PLT; AS MVP Gold75k; HHonors Diamond; IHG PLT
Posts: 3,503
The last time I checked, there is still SOME competition in the US airline industry. In a dynamic, competitive industry like air travel, resting on your laurels, attempting to milk an antiquated perception are not growth strategies.
#21
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ORD, MDW or MKE
Programs: American and Southwest. Hilton and Marriott hotels primarily.
Posts: 6,462
I think that LUV investors would disagree with you
#22
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,813
The problem with your statement is that the market is not dynamic. The major players have reached consensus on how to make the most money. To be dynamic someone needs to disrupt the consensus.
#23
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: National Capitol Region
Programs: Delta Dirt Medallion,AA,USairways, WN Rapid Rewards, National Emerald Club
Posts: 3,912
While they should be fined for the false advertising (a major pet peeve of mine with *all* airlines ), I actually kind of understand their business strategy for not distributing their fares to (most) third parties.
I don't necessarily *like* it, but I get how they've managed to reach a powerful enough market position where they don't need to use other firms to market their fares to fill planes. That has value, and they're exploiting it. I don't see that as unfair or anticompetitive in and of itself. (I also think Tesla should be allowed to sell cars without middlemen, but I guess that's for OMNI... )
I don't necessarily *like* it, but I get how they've managed to reach a powerful enough market position where they don't need to use other firms to market their fares to fill planes. That has value, and they're exploiting it. I don't see that as unfair or anticompetitive in and of itself. (I also think Tesla should be allowed to sell cars without middlemen, but I guess that's for OMNI... )
Common fleet saves money on maintenance and training
Full fleet utilization -maximizes efficiency
AND marketing their own flights saves expenditures on marketing and fees.
#24
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: National Capitol Region
Programs: Delta Dirt Medallion,AA,USairways, WN Rapid Rewards, National Emerald Club
Posts: 3,912
Not really, the U.S. market is islands of competition in a sea of non-competitiveness.
#25
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Diego, Ca
Programs: AA 2MM LT PLT; AS MVP Gold75k; HHonors Diamond; IHG PLT
Posts: 3,503
WN is reacting primarily to the disruptive actions of F9 and NK, at the lower end of the market. Both are enjoying continued profitability and growth - despite recording industry leading customer dissatisfaction.
At the other end of the market, it has been widely reported that select fares for the slower fall travel period are dropping, as carriers are FINALLY passing along some of the savings in fuel costs to compete. Carriers looking to use price to increase market share, fill empty planes do not need slick campaigns - simply put out the fares on travel booking sites, where WN has chosen not to participate.
#26
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 195
This is all convoluted by the fact that WN is the only carrier left where you can refare an infinite number of times at no cost.
If WN is 20% more expensive than somebody else today, but becomes 20% less expensive next week during a fare sale, I refare and collect the difference. Even if I had booked on the other carrier and they price match WN during their sale, I'm stuck with whatever I paid.
If WN is 20% more expensive than somebody else today, but becomes 20% less expensive next week during a fare sale, I refare and collect the difference. Even if I had booked on the other carrier and they price match WN during their sale, I'm stuck with whatever I paid.