![]() |
Originally Posted by Illiterate Idiot
(Post 9435143)
Jeez. Your really DUMB. Plane's dont go INSIDE terminal building's. Everyone know's that.
Originally Posted by oklAAhoma
(Post 9436260)
If AA really cared about it's customer base
OT, but I wonder why the thread title reminds me of a close friend of yours ... :D |
Originally Posted by diaspora04
(Post 9434480)
I
Is your last sentence intended to chill discussion, albeit nonflattering, of AA facilities or airports that AA serves? While this post does not merit a sticky, it might be helpful for an FTer considering whether to fly into JAX or use another airport and drive. |
Originally Posted by vasantn
(Post 9436388)
Must be something in the water.
Originally Posted by vasantn
(Post 9436388)
OT, but I wonder why the thread title reminds me of a close friend of yours ... :D
|
Originally Posted by oklAAhoma
(Post 9436581)
At first glance I thought the thread was her trip report from JAX... and that she'd gone there without telling me. :)
|
Are you sure we're not talking about JAX beer and the ceiling in your head after having drunk them (years ago). I'm not a novice traveler and I can't figure out what's wrong with the JAX airport. Security wasn't bad and gate area was better than many. Am I missing the point, or did the Jax 40 years ago cause brain damage?
|
Originally Posted by ricktoronto
(Post 9436557)
I really suspect ceiling height and erroneous claims of distance won't defer people from flying into JAX if in fact they have to go to JAX. Vs. say, ATL or MSY and then driving that distance you had to walk.
|
Originally Posted by ricktoronto
(Post 9436557)
If it was it didn't seem to work. I am off to the airport tomorrow with my laser measuring device to see about those ceilings. I really suspect ceiling height and erroneous claims of distance won't de[t]er people from flying into JAX if in fact they have to go to JAX. Vs. say, ATL or MSY and then driving that distance you had to walk.
Originally Posted by oklAAhoma
(Post 9436591)
What he said.
|
Originally Posted by vasantn
(Post 9436587)
Wouldn't that have been SUX-JAX? :confused:
|
I must stick to my poor opinion of JAX as an AA consumer. I am, furthermore, confused by the multiple defenses of a 35 year old cramped, dank and filthly little terminal C. One, I repeat, that has an unduly low ceiling and a brew pub run by Miller.
Unfortunate souls sentenced to use this facility should be aware of these facts and what I firmly believe are reasonable and objective opinions. |
Originally Posted by TexasFlyer
(Post 9436590)
Am I missing the point, or did the Jax 40 years ago cause brain damage?
|
Originally Posted by diaspora04
(Post 9436610)
Please click one of the Quick Reply icons in the posts above to activate Quick Reply.
|
Originally Posted by diaspora04
(Post 9436610)
Please click one of the Quick Reply icons in the posts above to activate Quick Reply.
Truth be told, I've never figured out in 7 years what the Quick Reply thingie is or does. Seriously. |
Originally Posted by vasantn
(Post 9436606)
You mean what he meant.
|
Originally Posted by vasantn
(Post 9436619)
Um, thanks.
Truth be told, I've never figured out in 7 years what the Quick Reply thingie is or does. Seriously. |
Originally Posted by vasantn
(Post 9436619)
Truth be told, I've never figured out in 7 years what the Quick Reply thingie is or does. Seriously.
(You're welcome. :) ) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:48 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.